scholarly journals Nicolas de Aqueville, Sermones moralissimi atque ad populum instruendum utilissimi supra evangelia dominicarum totius anni

2021 ◽  
pp. 86-87
Author(s):  
Marjorie Burghart
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
François Dolbeau
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Amiluhur Soeroso ◽  
Dewi Turgarini

Food becomes one of main income of tourism sector which supports Gross Domestic Product. Food and beverage is also suspected to be the tourists’ motivation for travelling. People, publicly, and government recognize it more as culinary. However, there is a view that argumentation which is constructed by public seems to be not accordance with the real situation. Gastronomy, which accommodates foodshed, cooking, until foodscape and human behaviour, is perceived to be more appropriate as a comparison argument. Related to that matter, in this paper, researcher is trying to study and to compare two-sided definition of terminology over culinary and gastronomy as a way to eliminate argumentum ad populum. Keywords: culinary, gastronomy, foodshed, foodscape, argumentum ad populum


1926 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Harrison Cadwallader Coffin ◽  
M. Inviolata Barry
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Binder ◽  
Gilbert Geis

For a variety of reasons, some valid, many irrelevant, it has become fashionable within sociological criminology to condemn juvenile diversion. Participants in the condemnatory rituals identify each other as insiders by catchy words and phrases (like “widening the net”), and frequently substitute rhetoric for logic in their argumentation aimed both at gaining cultic recognition and winning over the unwary. Perhaps the most damaging consequence is the forfeiture of influence in an important social process by a large array of social scientists. Contrary to the predictions of some in the cult, diversion remains a flourishing mode of serving young offenders, as indeed it must so long as the present juvenile justice system remains in operation.


1911 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 68-99
Author(s):  
J. S. Reid

The proposals which were made at Rome from time to time to grant to “Latini” the privileges of the provocatio, wholly or in part, raise questions which touch closely the history of the evolution of constitutional and criminal law at Rome during the republican age. So far as is known, the first attempt to sever the provocatio from the general rights of the Roman franchise, and to bestow it on Italian allies, was made by M. Fulvius Flaccus, consul in 125 B.C. the associate of C. Gracchus, who perished with him. According to Valerius Maximus, ix, 5, 1, he introduced “perniciosissimas rei publicae leges (rhetorical plural) de civitate Italiae danda et de provocatione ad populum eorum qui civitatem mutare noluissent.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document