Frameworks for Integration of Future-Oriented Computational Thinking in K-12 Schools

2022 ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
Scott R. Garrigan
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Child Centered ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Children’S Thinking

Computational thinking (CT) K-12 curricula and professional development should prepare students for their future, but historically, such curricula have limited success. This chapter offers historical analogies and ways that CT curricula may have a stronger and more lasting impact. Two frameworks are central to the chapter's arguments. The first recalls Seymour Papert's original description of CT as a pedagogy with computing playing a formative role in young children's thinking; the computer was a tool to think with (1980, 1996). This “thinking development” framework emphasized child-centered, creative problem solving to foster deep engagement and understanding. Current CT seems to include creativity only tangentially. The second framework encompasses emergent machine learning and data concepts that will become pervasive. This chapter, more prescriptive than empirical, suggests ways that CT and requisite professional development could be more future-focused and more successful. It could be titled “Seymour Papert meets Machine Learning.”

Frameworks for Integration of Future-Oriented Computational Thinking in K-12 Schools

2020 ◽  
pp. 30-44
Author(s):  
Scott R. Garrigan
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Child Centered ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Children’S Thinking

Computational thinking (CT) K-12 curricula and professional development should prepare students for their future, but historically, such curricula have limited success. This chapter offers historical analogies and ways that CT curricula may have a stronger and more lasting impact. Two frameworks are central to the chapter's arguments. The first recalls Seymour Papert's original description of CT as a pedagogy with computing playing a formative role in young children's thinking; the computer was a tool to think with (1980, 1996). This “thinking development” framework emphasized child-centered, creative problem solving to foster deep engagement and understanding. Current CT seems to include creativity only tangentially. The second framework encompasses emergent machine learning and data concepts that will become pervasive. This chapter, more prescriptive than empirical, suggests ways that CT and requisite professional development could be more future-focused and more successful. It could be titled “Seymour Papert meets Machine Learning.”

A Professional Development Framework for the Flipped Classroom Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 232-261
Author(s):  
Anne Katz ◽  
Tricia Muldoon Brown ◽  
Jackie Hee Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Elementary Grade ◽  
K 12

A major goal of K-12 education is to create a student-centered classroom where educators are teaching to increase critical thinking skills, promote problem-based learning, and differentiate instruction. However, the reality is that many educators are challenged by the difficult task of creating such a learning environment in their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors will introduce a Flipped Classroom Professional Development project, a Title II Part A Higher Education Improving Teacher Quality State Grant initiative. This project centered on two goals. First, the authors sought to teach the flipped classroom model through an integrated literacy and math approach while “mathematizing” read-aloud instruction for primary and elementary grade educators. Secondly, the chapter describes efforts to expand teachers' repertoire of effective instructional, blended technology tools for teaching math and literacy. The authors will conclude with the potential of the Flipped Classroom model in K-5 settings based upon this professional development framework.

A Professional Development Framework for the Flipped Classroom Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 211-238
Author(s):  
Anne Katz ◽  
Tricia Muldoon Brown ◽  
Jackie Hee Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Elementary Grade ◽  
K 12

A major goal of K-12 education is to create a student-centered classroom where educators are teaching to increase critical thinking skills, promote problem-based learning, and differentiate instruction. However, the reality is that many educators are challenged by the difficult task of creating such a learning environment in their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors will introduce a Flipped Classroom Professional Development project, a Title II Part A Higher Education Improving Teacher Quality State Grant initiative. This project centered on two goals. First, the authors sought to teach the flipped classroom model through an integrated literacy and math approach while “mathematizing” read-aloud instruction for primary and elementary grade educators. Secondly, the chapter describes efforts to expand teachers' repertoire of effective instructional, blended technology tools for teaching math and literacy. The authors will conclude with the potential of the Flipped Classroom model in K-5 settings based upon this professional development framework.

A Professional Development Framework for the Flipped Classroom Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 286-314
Author(s):  
Anne Katz ◽  
Tricia Muldoon Brown ◽  
Jackie HeeYoung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Elementary Grade ◽  
K 12

A major goal of K-12 education is to create a student-centered classroom where educators are teaching to increase critical thinking skills, promote problem-based learning, and differentiate instruction. However, the reality is that many educators are challenged by the difficult task of creating such a learning environment in their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors will introduce a Flipped Classroom Professional Development project, a Title II Part A Higher Education Improving Teacher Quality State Grant initiative. This project centered on two goals. First, the authors sought to teach the flipped classroom model through an integrated literacy and math approach while “mathematizing” read-aloud instruction for primary and elementary grade educators. Secondly, the chapter describes efforts to expand teachers' repertoire of effective instructional, blended technology tools for teaching math and literacy. The authors will conclude with the potential of the Flipped Classroom model in K-5 settings based upon this professional development framework.

A Professional Development Framework for the Flipped Classroom Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 122-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Katz ◽  
Tricia Muldoon Brown ◽  
Jackie Hee Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Elementary Grade ◽  
K 12

A major goal of K-12 education is to create a student-centered classroom where educators are teaching to increase critical thinking skills, promote problem-based learning, and differentiate instruction. However, the reality is that many educators are challenged by the difficult task of creating such a learning environment in their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors will introduce a Flipped Classroom Professional Development project, a Title II Part A Higher Education Improving Teacher Quality State Grant initiative. This project centered on two goals. First, the authors sought to teach the flipped classroom model through an integrated literacy and math approach while “mathematizing” read-aloud instruction for primary and elementary grade educators. Secondly, the chapter describes efforts to expand teachers' repertoire of effective instructional, blended technology tools for teaching math and literacy. The authors will conclude with the potential of the Flipped Classroom model in K-5 settings based upon this professional development framework.

Best Practices in K-12 Arts Integration

2017 ◽  
pp. 95-124
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Social Studies ◽  
Integrated Curriculum ◽  
Arts Integration ◽  
The Self ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
K 12

Arts integration is a necessary part of the STREAMSS (science, technology, reading, engineering, art, math, and social studies) curriculum model. Within an arts integrated curriculum, K-12 students can communicate thoughts and emotions through arts criticism, arts history, aesthetics, and arts production/performance. The goal of arts learning is to better understand the self and others through artistic expression about important topics and themes. The arts provide opportunities for students to think independently and critically, to solve real world problems, and to creatively work for a better future. Arts strategies for students encourage reflection, analysis, synthesis of new and existing knowledge, and creative problem solving. Teaching practices and effective strategies integrating the arts for K-12 students are provided for educators to create curriculum using the STREAMSS approach.

A Professional Development Framework for the Flipped Classroom Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 307-335
Author(s):  
Anne Katz ◽  
Tricia Muldoon Brown ◽  
Jackie Hee Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Development Framework ◽  
Elementary Grade ◽  
K 12

A major goal of K-12 education is to create a student-centered classroom where educators are teaching to increase critical thinking skills, promote problem-based learning, and differentiate instruction. However, the reality is that many educators are challenged by the difficult task of creating such a learning environment in their classrooms. In this chapter, the authors will introduce a Flipped Classroom Professional Development project, a Title II Part A Higher Education Improving Teacher Quality State Grant initiative. This project centered on two goals. First, the authors sought to teach the flipped classroom model through an integrated literacy and math approach while “mathematizing” read-aloud instruction for primary and elementary grade educators. Secondly, the chapter describes efforts to expand teachers' repertoire of effective instructional, blended technology tools for teaching math and literacy. The authors will conclude with the potential of the Flipped Classroom model in K-5 settings based upon this professional development framework.

scholarly journals Examining Student Regulation of Collaborative, Computational, Problem-Solving Processes in Open-Ended Learning Environments

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-74
Author(s):  
Mona Emara ◽  
Nicole Hutchins ◽  
Shuchi Grover ◽  
Caitlin Snyder ◽  
Gautam Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Computational Modelling ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Collaborative Problem Solving ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
K 12

The integration of computational modelling in science classrooms provides a unique opportunity to promote key 21st century skills including computational thinking (CT) and collaboration. The open-ended, problem-solving nature of the task requires groups to grapple with the combination of two domains (science and computing) as they collaboratively construct computational models. While this approach has produced significant learning gains for students in both science and CT in K–12 settings, the collaborative learning processes students use, including learner regulation, are not well understood. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis framework that combines natural language processing (NLP) of collaborative dialogue, log file analyses of students’ model-building actions, and final model scores. This analysis is used to better understand students’ regulation of collaborative problem solving (CPS) processes over a series of computational modelling tasks of varying complexity. The results suggest that the computational modelling challenges afford opportunities for students to a) explore resource-intensive processes, such as trial and error, to more systematic processes, such as debugging model errors by leveraging data tools, and b) learn from each other using socially shared regulation (SSR) and productive collaboration. The use of such SSR processes correlated positively with their model-building scores. Our paper aims to advance our understanding of collaborative, computational modelling in K–12 science to better inform classroom applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document