scholarly journals His Bundle Pacing Or Biventricular Pacing For Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy In Heart Failure: Discovering New Methods For An Old Problem

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parikshit S Sharma ◽  
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Author(s):  
Masako Baba ◽  
Kentaro Yoshida ◽  
Yuichi Hanaki ◽  
Masayoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Yasutoshi Shinoda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background His-bundle pacing (HBP) alone may become an alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) utilizing right ventricular apical (RVA) and left ventricular (LV) pacing (BiVRVA+LV) in selected patients, but the effects of CRT utilizing HBP and LV pacing (BiVHB+LV) on cardiac resynchronization and heart failure (HF) are unclear. Case summary We presented two patients with inotrope-dependent end-stage HF in whom the upgrade from conventional BiVRVA+LV to BiVHB+LV pacing by the addition of a lead for HBP improved their HF status. Patient 1 was a 32-year-old man with lamin A/C cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and complete atrioventricular (AV) block. Patient 2 was a 70-year-old man with ischaemic cardiomyopathy complicated by AV block and worsening of HF resulting from ablation for ventricular tachycardia storm. The HF status of both patients improved dramatically following the upgrade from BiVRVA+LV to BiVHB+LV pacing. Discussion End-stage HF patients suffer from diffuse intraventricular conduction defect not only in the LV but also in the right ventricle (RV). The resulting dyssynchrony may not be sufficiently corrected by conventional BiVRVA+LV pacing or HBP alone. Right ventricular apical pacing itself may also impair RV synchrony. An upgrade to BiVHB+LV pacing could be beneficial in patients who become non-responsive to conventional BiV pacing as the His–Purkinje conduction defect progresses.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parikshit S. Sharma ◽  
Gopi Dandamudi ◽  
Bengt Herweg ◽  
David Wilson ◽  
Rajeev Singh ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1548-1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Lustgarten ◽  
Eric M. Crespo ◽  
Irina Arkhipova-Jenkins ◽  
Robert Lobel ◽  
Joseph Winget ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Masako Baba ◽  
Kentaro Yoshida ◽  
Osamu Igawa ◽  
Masayoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Akihiko Nogami ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A number of heart failure patients (HF) do not fully benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Although His bundle pacing (HBP) have been developed as an alternative strategy, its role for treating advanced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Case summary We previously reported a patient with lamin A/C cardiomyopathy (Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020; 4:1-9). He had turned non-response to conventional biventricular pacing (BVP), and an upgrade to CRT combining para-His bundle pacing (HBP) and left ventricular (LV) pacing had markedly improved his HF status. In the present report, we assessed the autopsy and histological findings of this patient. A histological examination of both the LV and right ventricular (RV) apex pacing regions exhibited extensive scarring. Although a distinct conduction system was not identified in the alternative para-HBP region, the RV endocardium had more viable myocytes in this region. Discussion In patients with advanced cardiomyopathy accompanied by extensive fibrosis, RV apex pacing, delivered from scar tissue, can render conventional BVP ineffective. Additionally, HBP alone can not provide adequate resynchronization under the presence of diffuse injury of the His-Purkinje system. In these circumstances, combined para-HB and LV pacing may facilitate electrical and mechanical resynchronization of the ventricles and may be attributed to favourable CRT response in advanced HF, even if para-HBP fails to directly capture the conduction system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document