Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of Canyons in Layered Sites

2013 ◽  
Vol 438-439 ◽  
pp. 1559-1562
Author(s):  
Jian Wen Liang ◽  
Ming Liang Liu

This paper presents nonlinear seismic response analysis of canyons in layered sites. The equivalent linear method is used in the dynamic analysis and Lysmer-Kuhlemeyer transmitting boundary is added at the left and right boundaries of the computation region. It is shown through numerical examples that, soil nonlinearity has significant effect on seismic ground motion around canyons. There are differences between seismic response amplitudes in nonlinear analysis and those in linear analysis, but the differences are smaller for observation points inside canyons. There are shifts between response spectra in nonlinear analysis and those in linear analysis, but the differences are much larger for observation points inside canyons.

2013 ◽  
Vol 639-640 ◽  
pp. 911-916
Author(s):  
Cui Xiang Liang

This paper is concerned with the dynamical behavior of a chaotic system which is a model for seismic response of structures. The local bifurcation of the non-hyperbolic equilibrium point of the chaotic system is investigated by using center manifold method. The transcritical bifurcation is analyzed in detail. Based on numerical simulations, spectrums of maximal Lyapunov exponent and the bifurcation diagrams are presented for the dynamic analysis. The method proposed can be used as a reference of nonlinear seismic response analysis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 122-125
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Li ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
Xiao Bo Yu

In order to test the applicable of the seismic response analysis procedures SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 for class ІІ site, 17 stations and 35 underground strong motion records of KiK-net are selected from Class ІІ site. 210 working conditions are used to verify the applicability of the two soil seismic response analysis programs at Class ІІ site. These two programs are used to calculate the selected working conditions, giving the peak acceleration of the ground, the shear strain and the ground acceleration response spectra. By analyzing the results of the two programs and the measured results to assess the degree of difference between the two methods and which program is closer to the real situation. Studies have shown that in class ІІ site, in most cases, the results of SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ little. While comparing with the actual records, SHAKE2000 is closer to the strong motion records.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document