scholarly journals A Case of a Non-specific Small Intestinal Ulcer Treated with Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery after intestinal Endoscopic Marking

Author(s):  
Naohiko Nakamura ◽  
Hideto Fujita ◽  
Hisashi Nishiki ◽  
Yasuto Tomita ◽  
Takashi Miyata ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Sakai ◽  
Wataru Wada ◽  
Shintaro Kimura ◽  
Akiko Okada ◽  
Tomoko Hirakata ◽  
...  

Abstract Our report concerns a 64-year-old man with a small-intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which was successfully treated with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Small-bowel endoscopy detected a submucosal tumor located approximately 10 cm from the ligament of Treitz in the wall of the proximal jejunum. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a tumor (diameter, 4 cm) containing high- and low-density areas in the proximal jejunum. On 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET), the tumor demonstrated intense FDG uptake (maximum standard uptake value, 3.82), whereas it displayed high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. No metastatic lesions were observed. The patient was diagnosed with a jejunal GIST. Wedge resection of the jejunum was performed using the SILS procedure. The tumor was histopathologically diagnosed as a low-grade malignant GIST. SILS is a useful resection technique for small-intestinal GIST.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document