scholarly journals Mechanical Circulatory Support: Individualizing the Complexity of Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-423
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Schroeder
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 173-173
Author(s):  
A GKOUZIOUTA ◽  
E LEONTIADIS ◽  
S ADAMOPOULOS ◽  
A MANGINAS ◽  
G KARAVOLIAS ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Welp ◽  
V Kösek ◽  
G Mönnig ◽  
A Hoffmeier ◽  
A Rukosujew ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Jurmann ◽  
Y Weng ◽  
T Drews ◽  
M Pasic ◽  
J Mueller ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Morshuis ◽  
L Arusoglu ◽  
A El-Banayosy ◽  
L Kizner ◽  
K Kind ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (S 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jurmann ◽  
Y Weng ◽  
T Drews ◽  
M Pasic ◽  
H Lehmkuhl ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A El-Banayosy ◽  
L Arusoglu ◽  
M Morshuis ◽  
L Kizner ◽  
P Sarnowski ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Drews ◽  
M Dandel ◽  
F Kaufmann ◽  
M Pasic ◽  
Y Weng ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Patrycja Ganslmeier ◽  
Christof Schmid ◽  
◽  

Mechanical circulatory support for end-stage heart failure has become routine and is now increasingly used as definitive treatment. Several small devices qualify for this purpose, but only a few have gained US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as yet. Several studies, including the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) study, the Investigation of Non-transplant-Eligible Patients Who Are Inotrope Dependent (INTrEPID) and the HeartMate (HM) II trial have confirmed a significantly improved quality of life and functional capacity after device placement. However, cerebrovascular events, infection and device malfunction still pose a considerable risk to patients and hinder widespread use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document