Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Cardiac Transplantation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Purpose: To explore the value of metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) diagnosis. Methods: mNGS was used to diagnose DSWI after cardiac transplantation; DSWI was treated with surgical debridement, wound care, and antibiotic therapy guided by mNGS. Results: Coinfection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) was detected in this patient. The infection was controlled and the wound healed successfully with the specific medicine based on mNGS results for 3 weeks. Conclusion: mNGS is effective to achieve precise, individualized, and rapid treatment for wound infection.

Effect of Statin Intensity on the Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Background: In the non-transplant population, hyperlipidaemia has shifted from targeting LDL goals to statin intensity-based treatment. It is unknown whether this strategy is also beneficial in cardiac transplantation. Methods: This single-centre retrospective study evaluated the effect of statin use and intensity on time to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after cardiac transplantation. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression survival methods were used to assess the association of statin intensity and median post-transplant LDL on CAV-free survival. Results: The study involved 143 adults (71% men, average follow-up of 25 ± 14 months) who underwent transplant between 2013 and 2017. Mean CAV-free survival was 47.5 months (95% CI [43.1–51.8]), with 29 patients having CAV grade 1 or greater. Median LDL was not associated with time to CAV (p=0.790). CAV-free survival did not differ between intensity groups (p=0.435). Conclusion: Given the non-statistically significant difference in time to CAV with higher intensity statins, the data suggest that advancing moderate- or high-intensity statin after cardiac transplantation may not provide additional long-term clinical benefit. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Trends and Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in the Lowest Urgency Candidates

Background Due to discrepancies between donor supply and recipient demand, the cardiac transplantation process aims to prioritize the most medically urgent patients. It remains unknown how recipients with the lowest medical urgency compare to others in the allocation process. We aimed to examine differences in clinical characteristics, organ allocation patterns, and outcomes between cardiac transplantation candidates with the lowest and highest medical urgency. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients listed for cardiac transplantation between January 2011 and May 2020 were stratified according to status at time of transplantation. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, waitlist survival, and post‐transplantation outcomes were compared in the years before and after the 2018 allocation system change. Lower urgency patients in the old system were older (58.5 vs. 56 years) and more likely female (54.4% vs. 23.8%) compared to the highest urgency patients, and these trends persisted in the new system (p<0.001, all). Donors for the lowest urgency patients were more likely older, female, or have a history of CMV, hepatitis C, or diabetes (p<0.01, all). The lowest urgency patients had longer waitlist times, and under the new allocation system received organs from shorter distances with decreased ischemic times (178 vs. 269 miles, 3.1 vs 3.5 hours, p<0,001, all). There was no difference in post‐transplantation survival (p<0.01, all). Conclusions Patients transplanted as lower urgency receive hearts from donors with additional comorbidities compared to higher urgency patients, but outcomes are similar at one year.