Cotrel - Dubousset Pedicle Screw Fixation After Posterior Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Il Suk ◽  
Choon Ki Lee ◽  
Choon Seong Lee ◽  
Eung Ha Kim ◽  
Min Gang Huh
1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1696
Author(s):  
Chang Uk Choi ◽  
Yon Il Kim ◽  
Byung Joon Shin ◽  
Do Kweon Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Number 1) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Md. A Islam ◽  
Md. S Alam ◽  
Md. Q Parvez ◽  
S Batajoo ◽  
M Shrestha

Potts disease is a common cause of neurological complications and kyphotic deformity in our country. When deformity progressed that may leads to painful costo-pelvic impingement, respiratory distress, risk of paralysis of muscle of lower limb and consequent reduction in quality, longevity of life. The treatment strategy is to avoid neurological complication and achieve a near normal spine. In TB, spinal column may become unstable. Pathological fracture/dislocation of a diseased vertebral body may occur due to mechanical insult. Surgical decompression cause further instability. The insertion of a metallic implant is to provide stability. Pedicle screw fixation in kyphotic correction in old polls disease is a most suitable device. This prospective interventional study was done on BSMMU for the period of 60 months with minimum follow up period of 2 years. 20 cases (13 males and 7 females) of lumbar spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficit were operated with a transpedicular decompression and screw fixation along with anti-tubercular drug treatment. All of these patients had varying degrees of neurological deficit and single level involvement with vertebral body destruction and mild kyphosis of 5-15 degrees. Long segment pedicle screw fixation, posterior decompression, and correction of kyphosis were performed in single stage. The mean age of patients was 50.9 and kyphosis improved from 10.4+,2.9 degrees to 4.0±1.2 degrees Neurological recovery occurred in 18 patients (90%). Bony fusion was achieved in 67.5% cases. At 2-years follow-up mean VAS score improved from 5.5 to 0.75. So posterior decompression and transpedicular stabilization with continued chemotherapy is a good treatment option for the management of the lumbar TB in patients with vertebral body destruction.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Jae-Yeol Choi ◽  
Hun-Kyu Shin ◽  
Hwa-Jae Jung ◽  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Gwang-Sin Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 2254-2261
Author(s):  
Erland Hermansen ◽  
Ivar Magne Austevoll ◽  
Christian Hellum ◽  
Kjersti Storheim ◽  
Tor Åge Myklebust ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate changes in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Summary of background data Decompression of the nerve roots is the main surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. The aim of this study was to radiologically investigate three commonly used posterior decompression techniques. Methods The present study reports data from one of two multicenter randomized trials included in the NORDSTEN study. In the present trial, involving 437 patients undergoing surgery, we report radiological results after three different midline retaining posterior decompression techniques: unilateral laminotomy with crossover (UL) (n = 146), bilateral laminotomy (BL) (n = 142) and spinous process osteotomy (SPO) (n = 149). MRI was performed before and three months after surgery. The increase in dural sac area and Schizas grade at the most stenotic level was evaluated. Three different predefined surgical indicators of substantial decompression were used: (1) postoperative dural sac area of > 100 mm2, (2) increase in the dural sac area of at least 50% and (3) postoperative Schizas grade A or B. Results No differences between the three surgical groups were found in the mean increase in dural sac area. Mean values were 66.0 (SD 41.5) mm2 in the UL-group, 71.9 (SD 37.1) mm2 in the BL-group and 68.1 (SD 41.0) mm2 in the SPO-group (p = 0.49). No differences in the three predefined surgical outcomes between the three groups were found. Conclusion For patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, the three different surgical techniques provided the same increase in dural sac area. Clinical trial registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov reference on November 22th 2013 under the identifier NCT02007083.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document