scholarly journals The bioethics of end-of-life care in Internal Medicine: decision making and setting of care

2013 ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Traisci
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Physician Patient Relationship

Introduction In the field of Internal Medicine, the management of the terminal phase of an illness raises important issues involving clinical care, with particular reference to the physician-patient relationship. The present report describes the professional code of conduct relative to the assessments and decision making involved in end-of-life care. Materials and methods The article summarizes and discusses Italian common deontological low and the current positions of national and international experts in the field of end-of-life care. Results The ethical issues regarding euthanasia, withdrawal/withholding of health care, and medical treatment that uselessly prolongs the life of a terminal patient are defined and analyzed in conjunction with the outcomes suggested by the palliative medicine. Discussion Physicians caring for patients at the end of their lives must give consideration to bioethical approach.

Multi-dimensional approach to end-of-life care: The Welfare Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1955-1967
Author(s):  
Shin Wei Sim ◽  
Tze Ling Gwendoline Beatrice Soh ◽  
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
Team Evaluation ◽  
Welfare Model

Appropriate and balanced decision-making is sentinel to goal setting and the provision of appropriate clinical care that are attuned to preserving the best interests of the patient. Current family-led decision-making in family-centric societies such as those in Singapore and other countries in East Asia are believed to compromise these objectives in favor of protecting familial interests. Redressing these skewed clinical practices employing autonomy-based patient-centric approaches however have been found wanting in their failure to contend with wider sociocultural considerations that impact care determinations. Evaluation of a number of alternative decision-making frameworks set out to address the shortcomings of prevailing atomistic and family-centric decision-making models within the confines of end-of-life care prove these alternative frameworks to be little better at protecting the best interests of vulnerable patients. As a result, we propose the Welfare Model that we believe is attentive to the relevant socio-culturally significant considerations of a particular case and better meets the needs of end-of-life care goals of preserving the welfare of patients. Employing a multi-professional team evaluation guided by regnant psychosocial, legal, and clinical standards and the prevailing practical and clinical realities of the particular patient’s setting the Welfare Model provides a clinically relevant, culturally sensitive, transparent, and evidence-based approach to care determinations.

End-of-life care for patients with mental illness and personality disorders

2015 ◽  
pp. 618-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty D. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Life Care

This chapter examines what is known about palliative care and the mentally ill, including those with serious mental illness (SMI) and personality disorders (PDs). Special issues related to communication and treatment are presented as well as strategies for care for this population. Ethical issues including capacity and competency for decision-making as it relates to those with SMI and end-of-life care are also discussed. Collaboration and consultation between providers is essential in providing end-of-life care for those with SMI.

scholarly journals Conversations About Death and Dying, End-of-Life Care Plans and Preferences Between Aging Parents and Adult Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 417-417
Author(s):  
Hyo Jung Lee ◽  
Jacobbina Jin Wen Ng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Adult Children ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Death And Dying ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Joint Decision ◽  
Aging Parents ◽  
Care Plans

Abstract This study aims to investigate whether attitude and perception on late-life death and dying, end-of-life care plans and preferences could be better understood from current values shared between aging parents and their adult children in the multi-cultural city-bound country, Singapore. We are in the process of interviewing 20 aging parent-adult child dyads. Up to date, six semi-structured interviews were completed and transcribed. We performed Content analysis to analyze the transcripts. Preliminary findings showed that both aging parents and adult children rarely discussed this issue, although parents had their own plans or preferences. The major barriers against open conversations about death and dying of aging parents include: the perception of not-yet time to talk about this issue (without knowing when the right time is) and tendency to have conversations about death in tandem with finances, but not death itself. Although specific end-of-life care plans or arrangements were not thought out thoroughly, aging parents expressed a high level of trust and reliance on close family members’ decisions regarding their end-of-life care. They tended to agree on joint decision-making process within family, even though adult children had no or unmatched ideas about their aging parents’ end-of-life wishes. This did not necessarily align with previous findings in Western countries, underscoring individuals’ control over their own death and dying process. Open conversation within family, family-involved advance care planning, or joint decision-making processes may be warranted to promote quality of life and death in older Singaporeans and well-being of their family members of all ages.

How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees’ experiences providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106690
Author(s):  
Sarah Rosenwohl-Mack ◽  
Daniel Dohan ◽  
Thea Matthews ◽  
Jason Neil Batten ◽  
Elizabeth Dzeng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Ethical Frameworks

ObjectivesThe end of life is an ethically challenging time requiring complex decision-making. This study describes ethical frameworks among physician trainees, explores how these frameworks manifest and relates these frameworks to experiences delivering end-of-life care.DesignWe conducted semistructured in-depth exploratory qualitative interviews with physician trainees about experiences of end-of-life care and moral distress. We analysed the interviews using thematic analysis.SettingAcademic teaching hospitals in the United States and United Kingdom.ParticipantsWe interviewed 30 physician trainees. We purposefully sampled across three domains we expected to be associated with individual ethics (stage of training, gender and national healthcare context) in order to elicit a diversity of ethical and experiential perspectives.ResultsSome trainees subscribed to a best interest ethical framework, characterised by offering recommendations consistent with the patient’s goals and values, presenting only medically appropriate choices and supporting shared decision-making between the patient/family and medical team. Others endorsed an autonomy framework, characterised by presenting all technologically feasible choices, refraining from offering recommendations and prioritising the voice of patient/family as the decision-maker.ConclusionsThis study describes how physician trainees conceptualise their roles as being rooted in an autonomy or best interest framework. Physician trainees have limited clinical experience and decision-making autonomy and may have ethical frameworks that are dynamic and potentially highly influenced by experiences providing end-of-life care. A better understanding of how individual physicians’ ethical frameworks influences the care they give provides opportunities to improve patient communication and advance the role of shared decision-making to ensure goal-aligned end-of-life care.

scholarly journals An Individual Housing-Based Socioeconomic Status Measure Predicts Advance Care Planning and Nursing Home Utilization

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Barwise ◽  
Young J. Juhn ◽  
Chung-Il Wi ◽  
Paul Novotny ◽  
Carolina Jaramillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Composite Index ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Individual Housing ◽  
Lower Likelihood ◽  
Multiple Variables

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of disparities in health care and may play a role in end-of-life care and decision-making. The SES is difficult to retrospectively abstract from current electronic medical records and data sets. Objective: Using a validated SES measuring tool derived from home address, the HOUsing-based SocioEconomic Status index, termed HOUSES we wanted to determine whether SES is associated with differences in end-of-life care and decision-making. Design/Setting/Participants: This cross-sectional study utilized a cohort of Olmsted County adult residents admitted to 7 intensive care units (ICUs) at Mayo Rochester between June 1, 2011, and May 31, 2014. Measurements: Multiple variables that reflect decision-making and care at end of life and during critical illness were evaluated, including presence of advance directives and discharge disposition. The SES was measured by individual housing-based SES index (HOUSES index; a composite index derived from real property as a standardized z-score) at the date of admission to the ICU which was then divided into 4 quartiles. The greater HOUSES, the higher SES, outcomes were adjusted for age, 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance. Results: Among the eligible 4134 participants, the addresses of 3393 (82%) were successfully geocoded and formulated into HOUSES. The adjusted odds ratios comparing HOUSES 1 versus 2, 3, and 4 demonstrated lower likelihood of advance directives −0.77(95% CI: 0.63-0.93) and lower likelihood of discharge to home −0.60(95% CI: 1.0.5-0.72). Conclusion: Lower SES, derived from a composite index of housing attributes, was associated with lower rates of advance directives and lower likelihood of discharge to home.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document