2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1581-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F. D'Souza ◽  

The mandatory detention of asylum seekers in Australia and the administrative, legal and ministtreal appeal processes have lead to protracted process of refugee determination.Further compounding of trauma/ torture, diminished sense of self future and purpose leading to high levels distress including anxiety depressive and somatoform disorders. High levels of distress appear to persisit after refgugees are settled.Study/methods•Harvard Trauma Questionnaire-R (HTQ-R) •Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) •Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist (PMLDC) •Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Interview - Demoralisation Scale (PERI-D)f •ResultsN = 124. 84% Male; 93% conversant in English •Age: 20–62 years (μ = 35 yrs, SD = 10.8) •Residency Status: PR n = 32 (25%) Asylum Seeker n = 92 (75%) •Visa status: BVE (30%) BVA (23%) Student Visa (10%) •Time since application: 0 – 178 months (14.8 yrs) (μ = 31.2, SD = 48.4) •Not economic refugees. > 99% arrived by plane. • 34% without Medicare & 23% no work rights.ConclusionMultiple fold higher than the general population. -Highly traumatised population -Marginal reduction when granted protection •Inter-correlation between clinical measures à indicates pan-distress. •Clinical measures with number of rejections & time since app •Comparable number of pre-migration traumas yet difference in ‘refugee’ trauma & PTSD for AS vs. PR may reflect that current state of trauma is due to RDP ∨ perpetuating psychosocial factors •It has characteristics of many disorders but its own identity lication à weak association. -Ceiling effect of distress? -current state of trauma is due to RDP &/or perpetuating psychosocial factors •It has characteristics of many disorders but its own identity.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Alcock
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilwar Hussain ◽  
Braj Bhushan
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Silver Highfield ◽  
Puja Lama ◽  
Michael A. Grodin ◽  
Ted J. Kaptchuk ◽  
Sondra S. Crosby

Author(s):  
Belinda J Liddell ◽  
Gin S Malhi ◽  
Kim L Felmingham ◽  
Miriam Den ◽  
Pritha Das ◽  
...  

Abstract Social attachment systems are disrupted for refugees through trauma and forced displacement. This study tested how the attachment system mitigates neural responses to threat in refugees with PTSD. Refugees with PTSD (N=28) and refugee trauma-exposed controls (N=22) viewed threat-related stimuli primed by attachment cues during fMRI. We examined group differences and the moderating effects of avoidant or anxious attachment style, and grief related to separation from family, on brain activity and connectivity patterns. Separation grief was associated with increased amygdala but decreased ventromedial prefrontal (VMPFC) cortical activity to the attachment prime, and decreased VMPFC and hippocampal activity to attachment primed threat in the PTSD (vs TEC) group. Avoidant attachment style was connected with increased dorsal frontoparietal attention regional activity to attachment prime cues in the PTSD group. Anxious attachment style was associated with reduced left amygdala connectivity with left medial prefrontal regions to attachment primed threat in the PTSD group. Separation grief appears to reduce attachment buffering of threat reactivity in refugees with PTSD, while avoidant and anxious attachment style modulated attentional and prefrontal regulatory mechanisms in PTSD respectively. Considering social attachments in refugees could be important to post-trauma recovery, based within changes in key emotion regulation brain systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document