scholarly journals Short-term clinical outcomes of 220 dogs with thoraco-lumbar disc disease treated by mini-hemilaminectomy

Author(s):  
Ross C. Elliott ◽  
Chantel Moon ◽  
Gareth Zeiler ◽  
Remo Lobetti
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Dr. Padmanabh Vora ◽  
Dr. Parth Thaker ◽  
Dr. Jeet Gandhi ◽  
Dr. Yash Gupta ◽  
Dr. Himanshu Panchal ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5;17 (5;9) ◽  
pp. E599-E608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prof. Dong Ah Shin

Background: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive intervention designed to treat neck, back, and low back pain. The efficacy of lumbar PEN has been relatively well investigated, but clinical effectiveness according to catheter position has not yet been established. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between the ventral and dorsal positions of the catheter tip during lumbar PEN procedures using a retrospective review series. Methods: A total of 303 patients with back pain from single-level lumbar disc disease with and without radiculopathy were included in this study. In all patients, an attempt was made to place the catheter tip in the ventral position to maximize theoretical clinical improvement; however, several catheters failed to reach the desired position. Patients were assigned to 2 groups after lumbar PEN procedures were completed: those with catheters in the ventral position (Ventral group) and those with catheters in the dorsal position (Dorsal group). Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Results: The only demographic difference observed between the 2 groups (Ventral and Dorsal groups) was an elongated symptom duration in the Dorsal group compared to the Ventral group (16.1 vs. 9.4 months, P = 0.013). The VAS (back) scores during the follow-up period (1, 3, and 6 months) were similar between the 2 groups. In one area of the VAS scoring (leg), the Ventral group showed a similar effect at postoperative one month compared to the Dorsal group, but significantly improved at postoperative 3 and 6 months (1.3 and 0.9 in ventral group, and 1.9 and 1.4 in dorsal group, respectively; P = 0.002 and 0.010). Odom’s criteria were also significantly improved over 6 months in the Ventral group compared to the Dorsal group. Limitations: This study was a retrospective analysis with a relatively short follow-up duration was not a randomized, controlled study. Therefore, the clinical effects of the catheter position could be confounded by other variables. Conclusion: In this short-term follow-up study, the effects of lumbar PEN on VAS scores were different according to the position of the catheter tip in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation. Better outcomes in the Ventral group may have been achieved by more localized treatment with a selective block in the epidural space closer to the dorsal root ganglion and ventral aspect of the nerve root. Key words: Lumbar disc disease, pain management, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, catheter position, dorsal, ventral


2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199836
Author(s):  
Sathish Muthu ◽  
Madhan Jeyaraman ◽  
Girinivasan Chellamuthu ◽  
Naveen Jeyaraman ◽  
Rashmi Jain ◽  
...  

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether intradiscal Platelet Rich Plasma(PRP) injection has any beneficial role in the management of lumbar disc disease. Methods: We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library till September 2020 for studies investigating the role of intradiscal PRP in the management of lumbar disc disease. The analysis was performed in the R platform using OpenMeta[Analyst] software. Results: 13 studies including 2 RCTs, 5 prospective, and 6 retrospective studies involving 319 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A single-arm meta-analysis of the included studies showed a beneficial effect of the intervention in terms of pain relief outcomes like VAS score (p < 0.001), pain component of SF-36 (p = 0.003) while such improvement was not seen in functional outcome measures like ODI score (p = 0.071), the physical component of SF-36 (p = 0.130) with significant heterogeneity noted among the included studies. No structural improvement in magnetic resonance imaging was observed (p = 0.106). No additional procedure-related adverse events were noted in the included studies (p = 0.662). Conclusion: There is a paucity of high-quality studies to give conclusive evidence on the benefits of intradiscal PRP for lumbar disc disease. Although intradiscal PRP injection has shown some beneficial effect in controlling pain for lumbar disc disease, we could not find structural or functional improvement from the included studies. Hence, we recommend large double-blind double-arm randomized controlled studies to analyze the benefits of the intervention being analyzed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 76-B (5) ◽  
pp. 757-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Toyone ◽  
K Takahashi ◽  
H Kitahara ◽  
M Yamagata ◽  
M Murakami ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Qiang Song ◽  
Daniel WH Ho ◽  
Jaro Karppinen ◽  
Patrick YP Kao ◽  
Bao-Jian Fan ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEN WINSTON ◽  
CALVIN RUMBAUGH ◽  
VINCENT COLUCCI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document