scholarly journals A dosimetric study of volumetric modulated arc therapy planning techniques for treatment of low-risk prostate cancer in patients with bilateral hip prostheses

2014 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 018-021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh B. Rana ◽  
Shyam Pokharel

Abstract Background and Purpose: Recently, megavoltage (MV) photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has gained widespread acceptance as the technique of choice for prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy. However, radiation treatment planning for patients with metallic hip prostheses composed of high-Z materials can be challenging due to (1) presence of streak artifacts from prosthetic hips in computed tomography dataset, and (2) inhomogeneous dose distribution within the target volume. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric quality of VMAT techniques in the form of Rapid Arc (RA) for treating low-risk prostate cancer patient with bilateral prostheses. Materials and Methods: Three treatment plans were created using RA techniques utilizing 2 arcs (2-RA), 3 arcs (3-RA), and 4 arcs (4-RA) for 6 MV photon beam in Eclipse treatment planning system. Each plan was optimized for total dose of 79.2 Gy prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) over 44 fractions. All three RA plans were calculated with anisotropic analytical algorithm. Results : The mean and maximum doses to the PTV as well as the homogeneity index among all three RA plans were comparable. The plan conformity index was highest in the 2-Arc plan (1.19) and lowest in the 4-Arc plan (1.10). In comparison to the 2-RA technique, the 4-RA technique reduced the doses to rectum by up to 18.8% and to bladder by up to 7.8%. In comparison to the 3-RA technique, the 4-RA technique reduced the doses to rectum by up to 14.6% and to bladder by up to 3.5%. Conclusion: Based on the RA techniques investigated for a low-risk prostate cancer patient with bilateral prostheses, the 4-RA plan produced lower rectal and bladder dose and better dose conformity across the PTV in comparison with the 2-RA and 3-RA plans.

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 533-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Hernández ◽  
C. Blázquez ◽  
E. de la Peña ◽  
E. Pérez-Fernández ◽  
F.J. Díaz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
HafizMubibbullah Zulkafal ◽  
MuhammadAfzal Khan ◽  
MuhammadWaqas Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Akram ◽  
SaeedAhmad Buzdar ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Marina ◽  
Daniel J. Krauss ◽  
Donald Brabbins ◽  
Michelle Wallace ◽  
Alvaro A Martinez ◽  
...  

145 Background: Both IGRT and HDR are used for definitive treatment of low-risk prostate. No comparative study of these contemporary modalities exists. Methods: Charts for patients with low-risk prostate cancer by NCCN criteria treated 1999-2012 were reviewed. For IGRT, the clinical target volume (CTV) included the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles. A CT-based, off-line adaptive treatment plan was made with a patient-specific confidence-limited planning target volume (cl-PTV) based on the planning plus four additional daily CT scans. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test), with Cox regression for uni- and multi-variate analysis. Cumulative incidence (Gray’s test), with competing risks analysis (Fine and Gray) were used for biochemical control (BC) and freedom from local recurrence (FFLR). Results: There were 598 IGRT and 399 HDR patients (see Table), with a median follow-up of 6.1 and 3.6 years, respectively (p<0.001). The median prescribed IGRT dose was 75.6 Gy (range 73.8-79.2). HDR doses were 24 Gy (n=126) or 27 Gy (n=151) in 2 fractions, or 36 Gy (n=3) or 38 Gy (n=335) in 4 fractions. Five- and 10-year BC was 99% and 94% for IGRT and 98% and 95% for HDR (p=0.77); FFLR was 100% and 99% for both (p=0.89); and OS was 95% and 75% for IGRT and 97% and 85% for HDR (p=0.04). On multivariate analysis, predictors (p<0.10) for OS were age (p<0.001) and PNI (p=0.04); for LR, PPC (p=0.01); and for BC, a trend for PSA (p=0.08). Treatment type was not a predictor of OS, BC or FFLR (p>0.5). Conclusions: Both dose- escalated IGRT and HDR monotherapy yield similarly excellent outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer. Our experience supports the continued use of brachytherapy as monotherapy in low-risk prostate cancer. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliahu Gez ◽  
Joshua Genesin ◽  
Daniel Shahar ◽  
Valeriya Semenisty ◽  
Tanya Mashiac ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground: In low-risk prostate cancer, the target volume for radiotherapy is the prostate gland only and prostate brachytherapy with an I-125 implant provides the most conformal radiotherapy.Methods: Patients underwent a pre-implant prostate volume study from which a treatment plan was developed 2 weeks prior to implant. A dosimetric study was performed 1 month following the implant. The prescription dose was 145 Gy with the 95% isodose line covering the entire target volume. The maximal dose to the urethra was less than 210 Gy. Follow-up included serum PSA and IPSS evaluation every 3 months during the first year and then every 6 months beginning in the second year.Results: During December 2000–March 2009, 181 patients with early prostate cancer underwent I-125 implant. The median post-implant PSA value of the entire cohort was 0.7 ng/ml. No patient developed clinical failure. In the follow-up, nine patients had biochemical failure according to the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix definition (Nadir + 2.0 ng/ml). Of these, one patient refused hormonal therapy desiring to preserve sexual potency, and eight patients received hormonal therapy with a decreased serum PSA to 0.0 ng/ml. The treatment side effects were primarily urinary disturbances.Conclusion: An I-125 implant is an effective and well-tolerated treatment and should be recommended for patients with low-risk prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document