Comparative evaluation of retreatability of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in curved canals-An In-Vitro micro-CT analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
MV Mavishna ◽  
KondasVijay Venkatesh
Author(s):  
Gabriela Cardoso Ferreira ◽  
Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro ◽  
Júlia Silveira Nunes ◽  
Roberta Almeida Mendes ◽  
Cláudia Daniela Schuster ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 847-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Shetty ◽  
Pritesh Jagtap ◽  
Arpita Agarwalla ◽  
Parag Wani ◽  
Karan Bhargava ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Roopadevi Garlapati ◽  
KolluriMohana Chandra ◽  
PraveenKumar Gali ◽  
Bolla Nagesh ◽  
Sayesh Vemuri ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Reszka ◽  
Łukasz Kucharski ◽  
Adam Klimowicz ◽  
Mariusz Lipski

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the pH values of selected calcium-silicate root canal sealers in comparison with AH Plus resin-based root canal sealer.Materials and methods: Six root canal sealers were included in this study: BioRoot RCS (Septodont, France), GuttaFlow bioseal (Coltėne/Whaledent, Switzerland), MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Brazil), Total Fill BC Sealer (FKG, Switzerland), Well-Root ST (Vericom, Korea) and AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Germany). Materials samples (n = 6) were placed in dishes and immersed in 10 mL of distilled water (pH = 6.8). After 1, 3, 24, 48, 72, 168, 336 and 504 hrs, water pH was determined with a pH meter calibrated with a solution of known pH. Data were statistically analyzed using Student-t test (p < 0.05).Results: There were differences in the water pH between the materials tested. The highest water pHs were exhibited by Total Fill BC Sealer, Well-Root ST and BioRoot RCS (pH ~12), followed by GuttaFlow bioseal (pH ~10.5) and MTA Fillapex (pH ~9). The lowest pH was shown by AH Plus (pH ~8).Conclusions: All calcium-silicate root canal sealers studied are able to elevate the pH level, which could have biological and antimicrobial effects. The AH Plus root canal sealer has poor alkalizing properties.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Adhikesavan Jayasenthil ◽  
EmmanuelSolomon Sathish ◽  
PotluriVenkatalakshmi Aparna

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Ryeong Kim ◽  
Sang Won Kwak ◽  
Ju‐Kyung Lee ◽  
Hye‐Jin Goo ◽  
Jung‐Hong Ha ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupali Chadha ◽  
Sonali Taneja ◽  
Mohit Kumar ◽  
Sumit Gupta

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alexander Pompermayer Jardine ◽  
Ketsia Fernanda Váz Rosa ◽  
Felipe Barros Matoso ◽  
Ramiro Martins Quintana ◽  
Renata Grazziotin-Soares ◽  
...  

Abstract This study evaluated the 3D quality of root-end filling, assessing the presence (volume and percentage) of marginal gaps and internal voids formed after retro-filling with three calcium silicate-based materials: MTA Angelus (Angelus Soluçoes Odontologicas, Londrina, PR, Brazil), Biodentine (Septodont Ltd., Saint Maur-des-Faussés, France) and Neo MTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, Florida, US). Thirty human, extracted, single rooted teeth were used. Orthograde root canal treatment, root resection (3mm shorter than the apex) and retrograde cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips were performed. Teeth were divided into 3 groups (n =10 each) following a stratified randomization according to the initial volume of the root-end cavity. After retrofilling, samples were stored for 7 days. Then, two rounds of micro-CT scans were performed: soon after root-end preparation (with the cavity still empty) and 7 days after root-end filling. Marginal gaps, internal voids volume (mm3 and %), as well as, the overall defects (sum of gaps and voids) were evaluated. Statistics compared the three groups in relation to those defects. There was not statistical difference between groups regarding the marginal gaps (P≥ 0.05), the internal voids (P≥ 0.05), and the overall defects (P≥ 0.05). Median (mm3) and % of overall air-entrapment defects (gaps and/or voids) was: 0.004mm3 and 1.749% for MTA Angelus, 0.018mm3 and 6.660% for Biodentine, and 0.012mm3 and 4.079% for Neo MTA Plus. All materials had gaps and/or voids. No differences were found between MTA Angelus, Biodentine and Neo MTA Plus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document