scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy of twice-weekly prophylactic treatment with BeneFIX® (recombinant factor IX) followed by once weekly in children with severe hemophilia B: Six-year data from a local registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
RafalRaad Al-Janabi ◽  
AfrahA Salih ◽  
MohammedJ Alwan
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962094683
Author(s):  
Jerzy Windyga ◽  
Margarita Timofeeva ◽  
Oleksandra Stasyshyn ◽  
Vasily Mamonov ◽  
José Luis Lamas Castellanos ◽  
...  

Hemostatic management is essential for ensuring the safety of patients with hemophilia during surgery. This phase 3, prospective, uncontrolled trial, evaluated hemostatic efficacy, consumption, and safety of a recombinant factor IX concentrate, nonacog gamma (BAX 326, Rixubis® [Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA]), in intraoperative and postoperative settings in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B undergoing elective surgery (N = 38 surgeries; 21 major, 17 minor). Predefined preoperative hemostatic factor IX levels (80-100% of normal for major and 30-60% for minor surgeries) were maintained for each patient. Intraoperative efficacy was rated as “excellent” or “good” for all surgeries. Postoperative hemostatic efficacy on day of discharge was rated as “excellent,” “good,” and “fair,” respectively, for 29 (76.3%), 7 (18.4%), and 2 (5.3%) surgical procedures. All adverse events were considered unrelated to study drug; most frequently reported was mild procedural pain (9 patients). No thrombotic events, severe allergic reactions, or inhibitor formation were observed. Nonacog gamma was well tolerated and effective for intraoperative and postoperative hemostatic management of PTPs with hemophilia B. NCT01507896, EudraCT: 2011-000413-39


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1014-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Davis ◽  
Songkai Yan ◽  
Tadashi Matsushita ◽  
Lorenzo Alberio ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Aneta Neskoromna-Jędrzejczak ◽  
Katarzyna Bogusiak ◽  
Krzysztof Chojnowski ◽  
Marta Robak ◽  
Jacek Treliński

AbstractThe preparation of patients with hemophilia before surgical operations and dental procedures constitutes a significant clinical challenge. This article presents the implantoprosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with severe hemophilia B (factor IX activity <1%). The patient was prepared for the surgical procedure with recombinant factor IX concentrate (Rixubis) during the clinical surgery study. Tooth extraction and the implantation of four dental implants in the mandible were planned: one dental implant of 3.7 mm diameter and 10 mm length in the place of tooth 35, and another of 3.2 mm diameter and 10 mm length in the place of tooth 37. The next two implants were implemented 1 month later: one implant 3.7 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length in the place of tooth 46, and another implant 3.2 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length in the area of tooth 44. Appropriate substitution of the missing coagulation factor, together with the use of local hemostatic therapy, allowed dental implantation to be performed without excessive blood loss in this patient with severe hemophilia B.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Cuntz ◽  
Hedwig E. Deubzer ◽  
Johannes H. Schulte ◽  
Antje Nimtz-Talaska ◽  
Angelika Eggert ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962095083
Author(s):  
Jerzy Windyga ◽  
Oleksandra Stasyshyn ◽  
Toshko Lissitchkov ◽  
Vasily Mamonov ◽  
Margit Serban ◽  
...  

This phase 3, prospective, open-label, multicenter, continuation study (NCT01286779) investigated the use of a recombinant factor IX (FIX), nonacog gamma (BAX 326, RIXUBIS®) in patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B. The study population included 85 patients transitioning from a phase 1/3 pivotal study (NCT01174446), a pediatric study (NCT01488994), and 30 newly recruited patients, naïve to nonacog gamma. Patients received nonacog gamma as prophylaxis treatment (standard, modified or PK-tailored) or on-demand, as determined by the investigator. Treatment was assessed for safety, immunogenicity, hemostatic efficacy and consumption. In this study, after ≥100 exposure days, nonacog gamma resulted in no treatment-related serious adverse events, and no patients developed inhibitory antibodies to FIX. Nonacog gamma was efficacious at controlling bleeding episodes, with an 89.1% overall hemostatic efficacy rating of excellent or good, and 56% of bleeds resolved with one infusion. The annualized bleeding rate was considerably lower during prophylactic treatment (median ABR of 1.3 in 108 patients) than during on-demand treatment (median ABR of 16.5 in 13 patients). These results show that in previously treated patients and nonacog gamma-naïve patients, long-term use of nonacog gamma had acceptable safety and tolerability, and was efficacious as a prophylactic treatment for the management of bleeding episodes. NCT01286779, EudraCT: 2010-022726-33


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2294-2294
Author(s):  
Amy D Shapiro ◽  
David J Perry ◽  
Ross I Baker ◽  
Elisa Tsao ◽  
Baisong Mei

Abstract Background: The phase 3 B-LONG study demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in subjects with severe hemophilia B. For people with hemophilia, frequent bleeding events occur in target joints, which are a known precursor to hemophilic arthropathy (chronic joint disease). There is currently limited information available on the outcomes of prophylaxis in subjects with target joints who have severe hemophilia B. Aims: To assess the frequency of bleeding events and the dosing of rFIXFc in subjects who had ≥1 target joint at baseline in the B-LONG study. Methods: B-LONG was a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study that enrolled males aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia B (≤2 IU/dL endogenous FIX activity) who had received prior treatment with FIX. Subjects in B-LONG were enrolled into 1 of 4 arms: Arm 1, weekly prophylaxis; Arm 2, individualized interval prophylaxis; Arm 3, episodic treatment; or Arm 4, perioperative management. For the current post-hoc analysis, subjects with ≥1 target joint at baseline (per protocol, a target joint was defined as a major joint with ≥3 bleeding episodes in a 3-month period) and who received on-study rFIXFc prophylaxis (Arms 1 and 2 only) were included. On-study per subject target joint ABR (annualized number of bleeding episodes per year in all target joints combined), including overall, spontaneous, and traumatic target joint ABR, were assessed. In subjects with available prestudy and on-study ABR data, prestudy 12-month bleeding rates were compared with on-study overall ABR. Results: Forty-three subjects from the prophylaxis arms had target joints at entry into B-LONG and data collected during the efficacy period of the study (weekly prophylaxis, n = 35; individualized interval prophylaxis, n = 8). Of these, 40 subjects had both prestudy and on-study bleeding information available. Regardless of prestudy treatment regimen (prophylactic or episodic rFIX), on-study median ABRs were low among subjects with target joints at baseline compared with prestudy ABRs (Fig. 1). The on-study overall target joint, spontaneous target joint, and traumatic target joint median (interquartile range, [IQR]) ABRs were low for subjects in the weekly prophylaxis arm (1.03 [0.00, 3.07], 0.00 [0.00, 1.10], and 0.00 [0.00, 1.11], respectively) and for subjects in the individualized interval prophylaxis arm (2.20 [0.00, 3.75], 2.20 [0.00, 3.75], and 0.00 [0.00, 0.00], respectively; Fig. 2). A total of 17 (48.6%) subjects receiving weekly prophylaxis and 3 (37.5%) subjects receiving individualized interval prophylaxis had no target joint bleeding episodes on-study. The average weekly prophylactic rFIXFc dose for subjects with target joints at baseline was (median [IQR]) 46.26 (37.98, 54.55) IU/kg and 69.48 (57.28, 77.45) IU/kg for those receiving weekly prophylaxis and individualized interval prophylaxis, respectively. The median (IQR) average on-study dosing intervals for these groups were 6.98 (6.88, 7.00) days and 10.25 (9.45, 12.72) days, respectively. Among subjects with target joints at baseline who received prestudy rFIX and on-study rFIXFc prophylaxis (n = 6, weekly prophylaxis arm only; no subjects from the individualized interval prophylaxis arm who met these criteria had available data), the on-study median (IQR) average weekly prophylactic dose of 50.61 (39.61, 60.61) IU/kg with rFIXFc was lower than the prestudy median (IQR) average weekly prophylactic dose of 111.28 (95.56, 116.76) IU/kg with rFIX. Additionally, the on-study median (IQR) dosing interval (6.92 [6.79, 6.97]) with rFIXFc prophylaxis was longer than the pre-study median (IQR) dosing interval among these 6 subjects (3.50 [2.33, 3.50] days). Summary/Conclusion: For subjects in the current analysis with severe hemophilia B who entered B-LONG with target joints, rFIXFc prophylaxis was effective for reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes overall and in target joints. Furthermore, in subjects who received prestudy and on-study prophylaxis, rFIXFc was associated with reduced consumption and prolonged dosing intervals compared with conventional prestudy rFIX products. These results suggest that target joints can be effectively managed and controlled with rFIXFc dosed prophylactically every 1 to 2 weeks. Disclosures Shapiro: Baxalta, Novo Nordisk, Biogen, ProMetic Life Sciences, and Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy; Biogen: Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare, Baxalta, Biogen, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Kedrion Biopharma, Octapharma, OPKO, ProMetic Life Sciences, PTC Therapeutics, and Selexys: Research Funding; Baxalta, Novo Nordisk, Biogen,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Perry:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Baker:Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: conference travel support, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference travel support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference travel support; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference travel support; Bristol- Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: conference travel support. Tsao:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2013 ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Franchini ◽  
Frattini ◽  
Crestani ◽  
Sissa ◽  
Bonfanti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document