scholarly journals Comorbidity of Personality Disorder among Substance Use Disorder Patients: A Narrative Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpit Parmar ◽  
Gaurishanker Kaloiya
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S593-S593
Author(s):  
G. Tzeferakos ◽  
M. Papaliaga ◽  
C. Papageorgiou ◽  
P. Bali ◽  
A. Douzenis

IntroductionTo our knowledge, few studies address the issue of criminal responsibility among psychiatric offenders. In Greece, articles 34 and 36 of the penal code regulate criminal insanity and diminished responsibility, respectively.ObjectivesThe objective of the present study was to provide psychiatric/legal data considering the appeal to articles 34/36 of the Greek penal code.MethodsLegal case files of 100 adult subjects, 90 male/10 female, 88 Greeks/12 foreigners were examined.ResultsAccording to the first degree court, one defendant was found criminally insane, 29 with partial responsibility, while the rest were regarded as fully capable. The decisions of the court of appeal/the supreme court of appeal were 2 criminally insane, 36 partially responsible and 62, fully criminally responsible. The decisions were unanimous in 78% of the cases.The most common diagnoses were schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (18%), antisocial/borderline/mixed personality disorder (15%) and substance use disorder (15%). Court decisions of criminal insanity/diminished responsibility were higher when the perpetrator had an Axis I diagnosis (47.5%), significantly lower in cases of personality disorder (22.2%) and even lower in cases of substance use disorder (16.7%). In patients with prior hospitalizations the percentage of criminal insanity/diminished responsibility was 55.6%, significantly higher than in cases without (24.4%).ConclusionsSchizophrenia is the most common mental disorder correlated with offenders criminally insane/partially responsible, while a history of psychiatric hospitalization is a very strong positive predictive factor for the successful appeal of the aforementioned articles.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Sher ◽  
Timothy J. Trull

Author(s):  
Ahmed Rady ◽  
Ahmed Abdelkarim ◽  
Andre Ivanoff ◽  
Tarek Molokhia

Background: The published evidence supports dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) efficacy to treat patients with borderline personality disorder and particular emphasis on emotion dysregulation as a psychopathological construct. Aim: To assess the efficacy of DBT for improving emotion dysregulation among patients with a dual diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder. Methods: We recruited 40 patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder and assigned them to two groups of 20 participants each. One group underwent DBT therapy, and the other group followed a treatment-as-usual (TAU) protocol over one year. We used the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS) scores at baseline, immediately after therapy, and four months after treatment to assess emotion dysregulation. Results: We found significant improvements (p<0.05) in the DBT group after therapy that was maintained at least for four months afterward based on the DERS scores (including subscale scores). More patients dropped out of the treatment in the TAU group than in the DBT group. Conclusion: DBT is a potentially effective psychological intervention to treat emotion dysregulation in patients with borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document