scholarly journals Comments on a comparative study of access to inpatient psychiatric treatment in a public mental health service in Melbourne during COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 622
Author(s):  
Vinay Lakra ◽  
Annie Itrat ◽  
Karuppiah Jagadheesan ◽  
Vijay Danivas
Author(s):  
Amelia Gulliver ◽  
Michelle Banfield ◽  
Alyssa R Morse ◽  
Julia Reynolds ◽  
Sarah Miller ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND There is an increasing need for peer workers (people with lived experience of mental health problems who support others) to work alongside consumers to improve recovery and outcomes. In addition, new forms of technology (tablet or mobile apps) can deliver services in an engaging and innovative way. However, there is a need to evaluate interventions in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE This exploratory proof-of-concept study aimed to determine if a peer worker–led electronic mental health (e-mental health) recovery program is a feasible, acceptable, and effective adjunct to usual care for people with moderate-to-severe mental illness. METHODS Overall, 6 consumers and 5 health service staff participated in the evaluation of a peer-led recovery app delivered at a community-based public mental health service. The peer worker and other health professional staff invited attendees at the drop-in medication clinics to participate in the trial during June to August 2017. Following the intervention period, participants were also invited by the peer worker to complete the evaluation in a separate room with the researcher. Consumers were explicitly informed that participation in the research evaluation was entirely voluntary. Consumer evaluation measures at postintervention included recovery and views on the acceptability of the program and its delivery. Interviews with staff focused on the acceptability and feasibility of the app itself and integrating a peer worker into the health care service. RESULTS Consumer recruitment in the research component of the study (n=6) fell substantially short of the target number of participants (n=30). However, from those who participated, both staff and consumers were highly satisfied with the peer worker and somewhat satisfied with the app. Health care staff overall believed that the addition of the peer worker was highly beneficial to both the consumers and staff. CONCLUSIONS The preliminary findings from this proof-of-concept pilot study suggest that a peer-led program may be a feasible and acceptable method of working on recovery in this population. However, the e-mental health program did not appear feasible in this setting. In addition, recruitment was challenging in this particular group, and it is important to note that these study findings may not be generalizable. Despite this, ensuring familiarity of technology in the target population before implementing e-mental health interventions is likely to be of benefit.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Horowitz ◽  
Jennifer A. Perrott ◽  
Guy Cafri ◽  
Gregory A. Aarons

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1448-1453 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Fisher ◽  
Nancy Wolff ◽  
Albert J. Grudzinskas ◽  
Kristen Roy-Bujnowski ◽  
Steven M. Banks ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document