scholarly journals The incidence of odontoid fractures following trauma in a major trauma center, a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
AhadAbdullah Bugis ◽  
SamiIbrahim AlEissa ◽  
AliAbdullah Alhandi ◽  
RaghadKhalid Alsalamah ◽  
Abdulellah Alsheddi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752098311
Author(s):  
Gabriele Canzi ◽  
Elena De Ponti ◽  
Federica Corradi ◽  
Roberto Bini ◽  
Giorgio Novelli ◽  
...  

Study Design Retrospective study. Objective: Following SARS-CoV-2 pandemic break-out a lockdown period for the population and a reorganization of the Health System were needed. Hub-function Centers for time-dependent diseases were identified and Niguarda Hospital (Milan) was selected as main Regional Trauma Center. The purpose of our study is to report the experience of Niguarda Maxillofacial Trauma Team during this period, pointing out epidemiological changes in the presentation of trauma in comparison to the previous 3 years. Methods: Two hundred and sixteen patients were admitted to the Emergency Department from 8th March 2020 to 8th May 2020. One hundred and eighty-one had a diagnosis of Major Trauma and 36 had also facial fractures; 35 patients had isolated facial fractures. Data were compared to the activity during the same period in 2017-2019 and statistical analysis was carried out concerning demographic and clinical characteristics, trauma dynamics and positivity to COVID-19. Results: Cumulative curves of patients admitted because of Major Trauma describe a superimposable linear trend in years 2017-2019, while 2020 shows an increase from April 16th. Average age and number of more severe patients were higher than previous years. Epidemiological changes concerned road accidents, accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists, interpersonal violence, suicide attempts and domestic accidents. The incidence of facial fractures was confirmed through years and, according to its measured severity, 75% of patients required management. COVID-19 positivity without systemic symptoms didn’t influence the type of treatment. Conclusion: The COVID-19 lockdown offers a unique opportunity to study the reversal epidemiological effects on trauma.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110651
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
Jonathan Ko ◽  
William Xu ◽  
John Bruce ◽  
...  

Background This study reviews our cumulative experience with the management of patients presenting with a retained knife following a penetrating neck injury (PNI). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a major trauma center in South Africa over a 15-year period from July 2006 to December 2020. All patients who presented with a retained knife in the neck following a stab wound (SW) were included. Results Twenty-two cases were included: 20 males (91%), mean age: 29 years. 77% (17/22) were retained knives and 23% (5/22) were retained blades. Eighteen (82%) were in the anterior neck, and the remaining 4 cases were in the posterior neck. Plain radiography was performed in 95% (21/22) of cases, and computed tomography (CT) was performed in 91% (20/22). Ninety-five percent (21/22) had the knife or blade extracted in the operating room (OR). Formal neck exploration (FNE) was undertaken in 45% (10/22) of cases, and the remaining 55% (12/22) underwent simple extraction (SE) only. Formal neck exploration was more commonly performed for anterior neck retained knives than the posterior neck, although not statistically significant [56% (10/18) vs 0% (0/18), P = .096]. There were no significant differences in the need for intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, morbidities, or mortalities between anterior and posterior neck retained knives. Discussion Uncontrolled extraction of a retained knife in the neck outside of the operating room may be dangerous. Retained knives in the anterior neck commonly required formal neck exploration but not for posterior neck retained knives.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Trlica ◽  
Štěpánka Kučerová ◽  
Eva Kočová ◽  
Jaromír Kočí ◽  
Petr Habal ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 2446-2448
Author(s):  
Shahab Hajibandeh ◽  
Shahin Hajibandeh ◽  
Ethan Toner ◽  
Habibollah Saliani ◽  
Faisal Faruqi

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-270
Author(s):  
Sharfuddin Chowdhury ◽  
Sultan Bahatheq ◽  
Abdullah Alkaraawi ◽  
Muhnad Falatah ◽  
Rakan Almutairi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000779
Author(s):  
Daniel Braunold ◽  
Hannah Lewis ◽  
Breda O'Neill ◽  
Naomi Edmonds

Head injury is the largest cause of mortality in paediatric trauma. Infants (<1 year old) are a high-risk group and vulnerable to non-accidental injury. A single-centre retrospective study at a major trauma centre collected data on infants presenting with a head injury over a 48-month period. 1127 infants presented with a head injury. 135 CT heads were performed. 38% of scans showed intracranial pathology. The decision about which infants to send for CT scans remains complex. Liberal use risks over-exposure to ionising radiation while restrictive use may miss subtler injuries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document