scholarly journals A novel technique for prevention of gastroesophageal reflux in staged repair of long gap esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
VipulPrakash Bothara ◽  
GyanPrakash Singh ◽  
ShivNarain Kureel
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Angotti ◽  
Francesco Molinaro ◽  
Anna Lavinia Bulotta ◽  
Francesco Ferrara ◽  
Marina Sica ◽  
...  

More than 50% of infants with esophageal atresia have associated anomalies. We present a case report of a 46XX neonate with long-gap esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF), anorectal malformation, bowel duplication and vaginal agenesis. This is an unusual association of abnormalities which had not yet described in literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-166
Author(s):  
Elisa Pani ◽  
Enrico Ciardini ◽  
Elisa Severi ◽  
Noemi Cantone ◽  
Francesca Tocchioni ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1587-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.G Canty ◽  
E.M Boyle ◽  
B Linden ◽  
P.J Healey ◽  
D Tapper ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ashjaei Bahar ◽  
Ashjaei Bahar ◽  
Movahedi Jadid Merisa ◽  
Parvizi Azita ◽  
Talebi Ali

Esophageal replacement surgery is performed in children with either congenital long gap esophageal atresia or acquired esophageal damages such as caustic injury of the esophagus. although the left colon because of less variation in blood supply and suitable diameter in comparison with right colon is the better choice. A secured pedicled colon is mandatory for reducing the sever complications, such as leak and necrosis. Ileocolic conduit is an alternative method of colon interposition which has anti reflux effect and therefore with less complications related to gastroesophageal reflux. When we have a short segment esophageal stricture due to corrosive esophagitis or other causes of esophageal strictures which is refractory to repeated dilatations, it is advisable to perform colon patch esophagoplasty. Gastric transposition can produce a good way for gastrointestinal continuity with a perfect weight gain and oral feeding, therefor it can be a safe choice for esophageal replacement in children. Partial gastric pull-up is an alternative operation for esophageal replacement in children and infants with long gap esophageal atresia. Gastric conduit replacement is another alternative technique for esophageal replacement, in which a gastric tube is created in the abdomen and it is pulled to via thoracic cavity to the neck and is committed by cervical anastomosis. Antral patch esophagoplasty is used for benign and limited esophageal stricture due to gastroesophageal reflux. Usefulness of pedicled jejunum was under optimal results because of technical problems and high rate of necrosis and mortality for decades. Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous esophagoplasty is a scarce method which is reported by some surgeons for limited cervical esophageal stricture repair. Free microvascular transfer of the reverse ileo-colon flap with ileocaecal valve valvuloplasty is used for reconstruction of a pharyngoesophageal defect, and Patch esophagoplasty by using of degradable bioscaffolds of extracellular matrix have shown good results in preclinical and clinical outcomes to prevent stenosis after endoscopic mucosectomy. We will explain the advantages and disadvantages of these different surgical methods in this review article.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. e37-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Ellebaek ◽  
Niels Qvist ◽  
Lars Rasmussen

AbstractEsophageal atresia (EA) Gross type A (long-gap without tracheoesophageal fistula) is a rare and a surgical challenging form of EA that constitutes ∼6% of the children born with EA. We present the seventh reported case with successful esophagoesophagostomy obtained by magnetic compression of a long-gap EA type A without thoracotomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diez H. Oliver ◽  
Sidler Martin ◽  
Diez-Mendiondo I. Belkis ◽  
Wessel M. Lucas ◽  
Loff Steffan

The ideal approach to long gap esophageal atresia is still controversial. On one hand, preserving a patient's native esophagus may require several steps and can be fraught with complications. On the other hand, most replacement procedures are irreversible and disrupt gastrointestinal physiology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and medium-term outcome of electively delayed esophageal elongation procedures before esophageal reconstruction in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Since the neonatal esophagus grows over-proportionally and can increase its wall thickness in the first few months of life, we hypothesized that postponing the elongation steps until 3 months of age would lead to a lower complication rate. We thus retrospectively recorded complications such as mediastinitis, anastomotic leakage, stricture formation, or gastroesophageal reflux requiring surgery, and compared it to reported outcomes. In our treatment protocol, patients born with long-gap esophageal atresia underwent gastrostomy placement and were sham fed until 3 months of age. We then assessed the gap between the esophageal ends and started serial elongation procedures. We only proceeded to the reconstruction of the esophagus when its length allowed a tension-free anastomosis. From April 2013 to April 2019, we treated 13 Patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Nine patients without prior surgical procedures underwent Foker procedures. Four patients arrived with a pre-existing cervical esophagostomy and thus underwent Kimura's procedure, two of them with a concomitant Foker elongation of the lower pouch. Esophageal reconstruction was feasible in all patients, while none of them developed mediastinitis at any point in their treatment. We managed the only anastomotic leak conservatively. Almost half of the patients did not require any further intervention following reconstruction, while three patients required multiple (≥5) anastomotic dilatations. All but one patient achieved full oral nutrition. Only one child required a fundoplication to manage gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Electively delayed esophageal elongation procedures in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia allowed preservation of the native esophagus in all patients. The approach had low peri-procedural morbidity, and patients enjoy favorable functional outcomes. Therefore, we suggest considering this method in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.


1980 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Jolley ◽  
Dale G. Johnson ◽  
Charles C. Roberts ◽  
John J. Herbst ◽  
Michael E. Matlak ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Rasiewicz ◽  
K Świątek ◽  
S Gerus ◽  
D Patkowski

Abstract Since the very beginning in 1999, thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become a gold standard in many pediatric surgery centers worldwide. Despite the advances in surgical technique, treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia still remains a challenge. The aim of this study is to assess whether the localization of esophageal stumps can predict number of stages needed to perform anastomosis. We analyzed video records of 21 patients who underwent staged thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. We divided patients into two groups: first requiring single internal traction procedure, second who underwent multiple procedures. We assessed esophageal stump position in relation to thoracic vertebrae. The distance between stumps was measured in vertebral bodies. Mean distance between esophageal ends was 5.8 in single traction group. The distance between the stumps was significantly greater in multiple procedures group: 7.33 (P = 0.003). Patients who required multiple procedures had significantly lower localization of distal stump. Localization of proximal stump did not affect the possibility for anastomosis after single traction. Distance between both ends after internal traction was also significantly longer in multiple procedures group. Patients with lower localization of distal esophageal stump assessed during primary thoracoscopy are at higher risk for requiring multiple surgical procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document