scholarly journals A fast approximate method for predicting the behavior of auditory nerve fibers and the evoked compound action potential (ECAP) signal

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Azam Ghanaei ◽  
SMohammad Firoozabadi ◽  
Hamed Sadjedi
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Approximate Method ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Evoked Compound Action Potential ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Compound Action

Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 1025-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Bourien ◽  
Yong Tang ◽  
Charlène Batrel ◽  
Antoine Huet ◽  
Marc Lenoir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Computational Simulation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Round Window Niche ◽  
Compound Action

Sound-evoked compound action potential (CAP), which captures the synchronous activation of the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), is commonly used to probe deafness in experimental and clinical settings. All ANFs are believed to contribute to CAP threshold and amplitude: low sound pressure levels activate the high-spontaneous rate (SR) fibers, and increasing levels gradually recruit medium- and then low-SR fibers. In this study, we quantitatively analyze the contribution of the ANFs to CAP 6 days after 30-min infusion of ouabain into the round window niche. Anatomic examination showed a progressive ablation of ANFs following increasing concentration of ouabain. CAP amplitude and threshold plotted against loss of ANFs revealed three ANF pools: 1) a highly ouabain-sensitive pool, which does not participate in either CAP threshold or amplitude, 2) a less sensitive pool, which only encoded CAP amplitude, and 3) a ouabain-resistant pool, required for CAP threshold and amplitude. Remarkably, distribution of the three pools was similar to the SR-based ANF distribution (low-, medium-, and high-SR fibers), suggesting that the low-SR fiber loss leaves the CAP unaffected. Single-unit recordings from the auditory nerve confirmed this hypothesis and further showed that it is due to the delayed and broad first spike latency distribution of low-SR fibers. In addition to unraveling the neural mechanisms that encode CAP, our computational simulation of an assembly of guinea pig ANFs generalizes and extends our experimental findings to different species of mammals. Altogether, our data demonstrate that substantial ANF loss can coexist with normal hearing threshold and even unchanged CAP amplitude.

The antidromic compound action potential of the auditory nerve

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1826-1834 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Refractory Period ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Negative Peak ◽  
Positive Peak ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Compound Action

1. The antidromic compound action potential (ACAP) of the auditory nerve was evoked by shocks to the auditory nerve root and recorded at the round window of the cochlea in anesthetized guinea pigs. The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics of the ACAP and compare these characteristics with those of the orthodromic, sound-evoked compound action potential (CAP). 2. The ACAP consists of an initial complex of a positive peak (p1) followed by a negative peak (n1). In contrast, the CAP consists of a negative peak (N1) followed by a positive peak (P1). These differences in waveform are likely due to the differences in conduction direction, antidromic for the ACAP vs. orthodromic for the CAP. 3. After the initial complex, the ACAP has a second complex of peaks (p2, n2) at a latency of approximately 1 ms; this complex is much smaller in amplitude than the initial complex (p1, n1). It is likely that the initial ACAP complex reflects firing of auditory-nerve fibers whereas the second complex reflects firing of neurons further centrally, perhaps in the cochlear nucleus, that are activated by orthodromic firing of auditory-nerve fibers. 4. Experiments with shock pairs are consistent with the idea that for auditory nerve fibers, the absolute refractory period is < 0.5 ms, and the relative refractory period is between 0.5 and at least 5 ms. 5. Experiments with click-shock pairs indicate that a shock interferes with the response to a click when the click and shock are given at about the same time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

THE ELECTRICALLY EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL OF THE AUDITORY NERVE. LITERATURE REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 99-120
Author(s):  
D. S. Klyachko ◽  
◽  
A. V. Pashkov ◽  
S. V. Gadaleva ◽  
I. V. Naumova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Action Potential ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Evoked Compound Action Potential ◽  
Compound Action

scholarly journals Analysis of electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve in children with bilateral cochlear implants

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Ferreira Caldas ◽  
Carolina Costa Cardoso ◽  
Monique Antunes de Souza Chelminski Barreto ◽  
Marina Santos Teixeira ◽  
Anacléia Melo da Silva Hilgenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Action Potential ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Bilateral Cochlear Implants ◽  
Evoked Compound Action Potential ◽  
Compound Action

scholarly journals Acoustic–electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: Simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential

2007 ◽  
Vol 232 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill V. Nourski ◽  
Paul J. Abbas ◽  
Charles A. Miller ◽  
Barbara K. Robinson ◽  
Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Action Potential ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Compound Action Potential ◽  
Forward Masking ◽  
Evoked Compound Action Potential ◽  
Compound Action
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document