scholarly journals A rare complication of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after removal of the long Gamma nail in a healed intertrochanteric fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Lin-Yu Chao ◽  
Chin-Kai Huang ◽  
Chih-Kai Hong ◽  
Wei-Ren Su ◽  
Yi-Hung Huang
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Heck ◽  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Robert J. Bielski ◽  
W.T. Jackson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Yoon Jung ◽  
Hyeon Jun Kim ◽  
Kyu Taek Oh

Abstract Background:This study assessed the changes in hip muscles by comparing the preoperative and postoperative CT scan results between patients with intertrochanteric versus femoral neck fractures. Methods:48 patients who received surgical treatment for intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures from February 2013 to February 2019 and underwent pelvic computed tomography(CT) preoperative and postoperatively aged 65 and older with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. The subjects were divided into two groups: 26 patients with intertrochanteric fracture and 22 patients with femoral neck fracture. We measured the cross-sectional area(CSA) and attenuation of the gluteus medius(G.med), gluteus minimus(G.min), iliopsoas(IP), and rectus femoris(RF) on the contralateral side. Patient basic data were collected from medial records including sex, age, height, weight, BMI, BMD, Harris hip score (HHS), and length of follow-up until the final visit. Results: There was no significant difference in sex, age, height, weight, BMI, BMD, HHS, and length of follow-up until the final visit between two groups. The femoral neck fracture group had significantly larger CSA and cross-sectional area per weight(CSA/Wt) of the G.med and G.min(G.med CSA, CSA/wt preoperative 1995.29 vs 1713.64, 38.87 vs 32.74; postoperative 2144.98 vs 1815.56, 37.48 vs 32.78/G.min preoperative 745.22 vs 566.59, 14.32 vs 10.96; postoperative 764.39 vs 619.17, 14.78 vs 11.25). On the contrary, the intertrochanteric fracture group had significantly greater CSA and CSA/Wt of the IP and RF(IP preoperative 810.86 vs 661.88, 17.73 vs 9.42; postoperative 681.98 vs 571.32, 12.68 vs 9.88/RF preoperative 503.66 vs 386.72, 9.42 vs 7.23; postoperative 426.24 vs 349.31, 7.17 vs 5.23). HHS related with function had no significant correlation with postoperative CSA and CSA/Wt. There was no significant difference in attenuation between two groups. All subjects had a significant decrease of muscle attenuation postoperatively.Conclusions: The CSA of the hip abductor(G.med and G.min) was significantly larger in the femoral neck fracture group, while the CSA of the hip flexor(IP and RF) was significantly higher in the intertrochanteric fracture group. Based on these findings, choosing the rehabilitation program suitable for the fracture site is expected to be beneficial in hip fracture rehabilitation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Saori Niitsu ◽  
Shohei Okahisa ◽  
Yuki Fujihara ◽  
Yu Takeda ◽  
Shigeo Fukunishi

A 64-year-old woman with a spontaneous fused hip sustained a left femoral neck fracture. It was revealed that her left hip joint had a long-standing spontaneous hip fusion due to end-stage osteoarthritis. Additionally, she sustained an ipsilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture and underwent osteosynthesis using a dynamic hip screw 8 years ago. The one-stage THA was successfully treated with no major complications and good functional recovery was obtained. The hip range of motion improved remarkably at one year after surgery. The Modified Harris Hip Score improved from an estimated 70 points before fracture to 95 points at final follow-up.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Kaneko ◽  
Keiji Matsuda ◽  
Sungon Kim ◽  
Kouichi Maeda ◽  
Takashi Ikegami ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelhalim El Ibrahimi ◽  
Mohamed Shimi ◽  
Abdelmajid Elmrini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document