Femoral Neck Fracture After Healed Open Reduction Internal Fixation of an Intertrochanteric Fracture

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. E20-E22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Ziets ◽  
Steven F. Harwin
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Neck Fracture

Combination of CRP with NLR is a sensitive tool for screening fixation-related infection in patients undergoing conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation for femoral neck fracture

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hong Xu ◽  
Jin-Wei Xie ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Duan Wang ◽  
Ze-Yu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Sensitive Tool ◽  
Neck Fracture

Aims Monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) or neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are useful for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but their diagnostic values are unclear for screening fixation-related infection (FRI) in patients for whom conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is planned after failed internal fixation for femoral neck fracture. Methods We retrospectively included 340 patients who underwent conversion THA after internal fixation for femoral neck fracture from January 2008 to September 2020. Those patients constituted two groups: noninfected patients and patients diagnosed with FRI according to the 2013 International Consensus Meeting Criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of these two preoperative ratios. The diagnostic performance of the two ratios combined with preoperative CRP or ESR was also evaluated. Results The numbers of patients with and without FRI were 19 (5.6%) and 321 (94.4%), respectively. Areas under the ROC curve for diagnosing FRI were 0.763 for MLR, 0.686 for NLR, 0.905 for CRP, and 0.769 for ESR. Based on the Youden index, the optimal predictive cutoffs were 0.25 for MLR and 2.38 for NLR. Sensitivity and specificity were 78.9% and 71.0% for MLR, and 78.9% and 56.4% for NLR, respectively. The combination of CRP with MLR showed a sensitivity of 84.2% and specificity of 94.6%, while the corresponding values for the combination of CRP with NLR were 89.5% and 91.5%, respectively. Conclusion The presence of preoperative FRI among patients undergoing conversion THA after internal fixation for femoral neck fracture should be determined. The combination of preoperative CRP with NLR is sensitive tool for screening FRI in those patients.

scholarly journals Hip dislocation following the treatment of femoral neck fracture: Case report

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 248-251
Author(s):  
Zoran Vukasinovic ◽  
Igor Seslija ◽  
Borislav Dulic
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Limited Range Of Motion ◽  
Femoral Head Osteonecrosis ◽  
Neck Fracture

Introduction. Femoral neck fractures are very rare in young patients and are frequently complicated by femoral head osteonecrosis and femoral neck nonunion. Case Outline. A 19-year-old girl with hip dislocation following the treatment of the femoral neck fracture is presented. The femoral neck fracture was initially treated by open reduction and three-screw fixation. After detecting the nonunion of femoral neck, valgus osteotomy was done. Secondary, iatrogenic, hip dislocation appeared. The patient had pains, and in clinical findings a shorter leg and limited range of motion in the hip - altogether 40 degrees. She was then successfully treated by open reduction, together with Chiari pelvic osteotomy and joint transfixation. Transfixation pin was removed three weeks following the operation. After that, the patient was put into the abduction device and physical therapy was started. The mentioned regimen lasted four months after the surgery, then the abduction device was removed and walking started. Full weight bearing was allowed eight months after surgery. Conclusion. As we have not found the literature data concerning the above mentioned problem, we solved it in the way that we usually do for the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip in adolescence.

Femoral neck fracture following intertrochanteric fracture

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Heck ◽  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Robert J. Bielski ◽  
W.T. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Neck Fracture

Comparative Analysis of Preoperative and Postoperative Muscle Around Hip Joint by Computed Tomography Between Intertrochanteric Fracture and Femur Neck Fracture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Yoon Jung ◽  
Hyeon Jun Kim ◽  
Kyu Taek Oh
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fracture Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neck Fracture

Abstract Background:This study assessed the changes in hip muscles by comparing the preoperative and postoperative CT scan results between patients with intertrochanteric versus femoral neck fractures. Methods:48 patients who received surgical treatment for intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures from February 2013 to February 2019 and underwent pelvic computed tomography(CT) preoperative and postoperatively aged 65 and older with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. The subjects were divided into two groups: 26 patients with intertrochanteric fracture and 22 patients with femoral neck fracture. We measured the cross-sectional area(CSA) and attenuation of the gluteus medius(G.med), gluteus minimus(G.min), iliopsoas(IP), and rectus femoris(RF) on the contralateral side. Patient basic data were collected from medial records including sex, age, height, weight, BMI, BMD, Harris hip score (HHS), and length of follow-up until the final visit. Results: There was no significant difference in sex, age, height, weight, BMI, BMD, HHS, and length of follow-up until the final visit between two groups. The femoral neck fracture group had significantly larger CSA and cross-sectional area per weight(CSA/Wt) of the G.med and G.min(G.med CSA, CSA/wt preoperative 1995.29 vs 1713.64, 38.87 vs 32.74; postoperative 2144.98 vs 1815.56, 37.48 vs 32.78/G.min preoperative 745.22 vs 566.59, 14.32 vs 10.96; postoperative 764.39 vs 619.17, 14.78 vs 11.25). On the contrary, the intertrochanteric fracture group had significantly greater CSA and CSA/Wt of the IP and RF(IP preoperative 810.86 vs 661.88, 17.73 vs 9.42; postoperative 681.98 vs 571.32, 12.68 vs 9.88/RF preoperative 503.66 vs 386.72, 9.42 vs 7.23; postoperative 426.24 vs 349.31, 7.17 vs 5.23). HHS related with function had no significant correlation with postoperative CSA and CSA/Wt. There was no significant difference in attenuation between two groups. All subjects had a significant decrease of muscle attenuation postoperatively.Conclusions: The CSA of the hip abductor(G.med and G.min) was significantly larger in the femoral neck fracture group, while the CSA of the hip flexor(IP and RF) was significantly higher in the intertrochanteric fracture group. Based on these findings, choosing the rehabilitation program suitable for the fracture site is expected to be beneficial in hip fracture rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (21) ◽  
pp. 2630-2638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Yi Ye ◽  
An Liu ◽  
Ming-Yuan Xu ◽  
Nwofor Samuel Nonso ◽  
Rong-Xin He
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document