Germany: Continuous Intergovernmental Negotiations

Author(s):  
Ulrich Teichler
2021 ◽  
pp. 347-350
Author(s):  
Caroline E. Foster

Regulatory disputes place significant demands on international courts and tribunals. At present the production of regulatory standards in the work of international courts and tribunals can be viewed in terms of an ordering of plural domestic and international legal orders rather than a process of constitutionalisation. Yet the new body of regulatory rubrics appearing across the jurisprudence addressed in this book and beyond marks a significant development globally. Collectively, these standards will set the terms for States’ exercise of public power with effects for populations beyond their own. However, international courts’ and tribunals’ contribution to the elaboration of global regulatory standards needs to be understood as part of a wider process involving intergovernmental negotiations and the administrative implementation of relevant norms. Public information and international engagement is essential. Meantime, transparent articulation of reasons for international adjudicatory decisions is needed, together with ongoing reflective interaction between judges, practitioners and the broader scholarly community.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole J. Saam ◽  
David Sumpter

2019 ◽  
pp. 126-140
Author(s):  
Roger Richman ◽  
Orion F. White ◽  
Michaux H. Wilkinson

Author(s):  
Thomas Milton

The EU’s freedom of movement has increasingly been brought into question in the last few years as member states have restricted social benefits for EU migrants. Britain proposed in-work benefit restrictions for economically active EU migrants in intergovernmental negotiations leading up to the referendum on its membership to the EU. Access to social benefits is an important component of free movement. It provides EU citizens with social rights in host member states, which promotes internal migration. Restricting free movement threatens European integration because it is a fundamental EU treaty right. This article analyses Britain’s preferences towards the EU’s free movement and social security coordination policies leading up to the Brexit referendum. Britain’s identity, and conceptions of statehood and European.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document