The Steiner Point of a Convex Polytope

1966 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 1294-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Shephard

Associated with each bounded convex set K in n-dimensional euclidean space En is a point s(K) known as its Steiner point. First considered by Steiner in 1840 (6, p. 99) in connection with an extremal problem for convex regions, this point has been found useful in some recent investigations (for example, 4) because of the linearity property1Addition on the left is vector addition of convex sets.

1976 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Elkington ◽  
J. Hammer

Let S be a closed bounded convex set in d-dimensional Euclidean space Ed. The width w(S) of S is the minimum distance between supporting hyperplanes of S, and L(S) is the number of integral lattice points in the interior of S.


1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. C. Baker

The purpose of this paper is to prove that if n+3, or more, strongly convex sets on an n dimensional sphere are such that each intersection of n+2 of them is empty, then the intersection of some n+1 of them is empty. (The n dimensional sphere is understood to be the set of points in n+1 dimensional Euclidean space satisfying x21+x22+ …+x2n+1 = 1.)


1963 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Mitchell

Let be a closed rectifiable curve, not going through the origin, which bounds a domain Ω in the complex ζ-plane. Let X = (x, y, z) be a point in three-dimensional euclidean space E3 and setThe Bergman-Whittaker operator defined by


Author(s):  
P. A. P. Moran

Consider bounded sets of points in a Euclidean space Rq of q dimensions. Let h(t) be a continuous increasing function, positive for t>0, and such that h(0) = 0. Then the Hausdroff measure h–mE of a set E in Rq, relative to the function h(t), is defined as follows. Let ε be a small positive number and suppose E is covered by a finite or enumerably infinite sequence of convex sets {Ui} (open or closed) of diameters di less than or equal to ε. Write h–mεE = greatest lower bound for any such sequence {Ui}. Then h–mεE is non-decreasing as ε tends to zero. We define


Author(s):  
H. G. Eggleston

SummaryA set X in Euclidean space is Valentine n–convex, or simply n–convex' if it has the following property. If X contains a subset Y consisting of n distinct points then X also contains the points of at least one segment with end points in Y. We show here that the vector sum of two plane compact 3-convex sets is 5-convex (which complements the result of I. D. Calvert(1) that the intersection of two plane compact 3-convex sets is 5-convex) and that the vector sum of a plane connected compact 3-convex set with itself is 4-convex. These results are not true in 4 dimensional space. It is an open question whether or not they are true in 3-dimensional space.


1976 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228
Author(s):  
H. G. Eggleston

A subset X of Euclidean space such that if a, b, c are points of X then at least one of the segments joining two of them lies in X, is said to be V-convex. Valentine (4) showed that in two dimensions a compact V-convex set is the union of at most three convex sets. We show here that if the set of star centres of X is of lower dimension than X and X is a compact V-convex set then it is the union of at most two convex sets.


1980 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.R. Scott

Let K be a bounded closed convex set in the plane containing no points of the integral lattice in its interior and having width w, area A, perimeter p and circumradius R. The following best possible inequalities are established:


Author(s):  
John Hawkes

Let Xt be a Lévy process in Rd, d-dimensional euclidean space. That is X is a Markov process whose transition function satisfies


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-98
Author(s):  
V. Soltan

Based on the notion of plane asymptote, we introduce the new concept of cone asymptote of a set in the n-dimensional Euclidean space. We discuss the existence and describe some families of cone asymptotes.


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Marilyn Breen

Let 5 be a subset of Euclidean space. The set 5 is said to be m-convex, m ≥ 2, if and only if for every m distinct points of S, at least one of the line segments determined by these points lies in 5. Clearly any union of m mdash — 1 convex sets will be m-convex, yet the converse is false. However, several decomposition theorems have been proved which allow us to write any closed planar m-convex set as a finite union of convex sets, and actual bounds for the decomposition in terms of m have been obtained ([6], [4], [3]). Moreover, with the restriction that (int cl S) ∼ S contain no isolated points, an arbitrary planar m-convex set S may be decomposed into a finite union of convex sets ([1].Here we strengthen the m-convexity condition to define an analogous combinatorial property for segments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document