On Functional Representations of a Ring without Nilpotent Elements

1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwangil Koh

In [3, p. 149], J. Lambek gives a proof of a theorem, essentially due to Grothendieck and Dieudonne, that if R is a commutative ring with 1 then R is isomorphic to the ring of global sections of a sheaf over the prime ideal space of R where a stalk of the sheaf is of the form R/0P, for each prime ideal P, and . In this note we will show, this type of representation of a noncommutative ring is possible if the ring contains no nonzero nilpotent elements.

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-259
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Hashemi ◽  
Fatemeh Shokuhifar ◽  
Abdollah Alhevaz

Abstract The intersection of all maximal right ideals of a near-ring N is called the quasi-radical of N. In this paper, first we show that the quasi-radical of the zero-symmetric near-ring of polynomials R0[x] equals to the set of all nilpotent elements of R0[x], when R is a commutative ring with Nil (R)2 = 0. Then we show that the quasi-radical of R0[x] is a subset of the intersection of all maximal left ideals of R0[x]. Also, we give an example to show that for some commutative ring R the quasi-radical of R0[x] coincides with the intersection of all maximal left ideals of R0[x]. Moreover, we prove that the quasi-radical of R0[x] is the greatest quasi-regular (right) ideal of it.


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-328
Author(s):  
Soheila Khojasteh ◽  
Mohammad Javad Nikmehr

AbstractLet R be a commutative ring with non-zero identity. In this paper, we introduce theweakly nilpotent graph of a commutative ring. The weakly nilpotent graph of R denoted by Γw(R) is a graph with the vertex set R* and two vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if x y ∊ N(R)*, where R* = R \ {0} and N(R)* is the set of all non-zero nilpotent elements of R. In this article, we determine the diameter of weakly nilpotent graph of an Artinian ring. We prove that if Γw(R) is a forest, then Γw(R) is a union of a star and some isolated vertices. We study the clique number, the chromatic number, and the independence number of Γw(R). Among other results, we show that for an Artinian ring R, Γw(R) is not a disjoint union of cycles or a unicyclic graph. For Artinan rings, we determine diam . Finally, we characterize all commutative rings R for which is a cycle, where is the complement of the weakly nilpotent graph of R.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 1550079 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Nikmehr ◽  
S. Khojasteh

Let R be a commutative ring with identity, I its proper ideal and M be a unitary R-module. In this paper, we introduce and study a kind of graph structure of an R-module M with respect to proper ideal I, denoted by ΓI(RM) or simply ΓI(M). It is the (undirected) graph with the vertex set M\{0} and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if [x : M][y : M] ⊆ I. Clearly, the zero-divisor graph of R is a subgraph of Γ0(R); this is an important result on the definition. We prove that if ann R(M) ⊆ I and H is the subgraph of ΓI(M) induced by the set of all non-isolated vertices, then diam (H) ≤ 3 and gr (ΓI(M)) ∈ {3, 4, ∞}. Also, we prove that if Spec (R) and ω(Γ Nil (R)(M)) are finite, then χ(Γ Nil (R)(M)) ≤ ∣ Spec (R)∣ + ω(Γ Nil (R)(M)). Moreover, for a secondary R-module M and prime ideal P, we determine the chromatic number and the clique number of ΓP(M), where ann R(M) ⊆ P. Among other results, it is proved that for a semisimple R-module M with ann R(M) ⊆ I, ΓI(M) is a forest if and only if ΓI(M) is a union of isolated vertices or a star.


1998 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary F. Birkenmeier ◽  
Jin Yong Kim ◽  
Jae Keol Park

AbstractLet P be a prime ideal of a ring R, O(P) = {a ∊ R | aRs = 0, for some s ∊ R/P} | and Ō(P) = {x ∊ R | xn ∊ O(P), for some positive integer n}. Several authors have obtained sheaf representations of rings whose stalks are of the form R/O(P). Also in a commutative ring a minimal prime ideal has been characterized as a prime ideal P such that P= Ō(P). In this paper we derive various conditions which ensure that a prime ideal P = Ō(P). The property that P = Ō(P) is then used to obtain conditions which determine when R/O(P) has a unique minimal prime ideal. Various generalizations of O(P) and Ō(P) are considered. Examples are provided to illustrate and delimit our results.


Author(s):  
George Szeto ◽  
Yuen-Fat Wong

AbstractThe quaternion algebra of degree 2 over a commutative ring as defined by S. Parimala and R. Sridharan is generalized to a separable cyclic extension B[j] of degree n over a noncommutative ring B. A characterization of such an extension is given, and a relation between Azumaya algebras and Galois extensions for B[j] is also obtained.


2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dobbs

AbstractIf n and m are positive integers, necessary and sufficient conditions are given for the existence of a finite commutative ring R with exactly n elements and exactly m prime ideals. Next, assuming the Axiom of Choice, it is proved that if R is a commutative ring and T is a commutative R-algebra which is generated by a set I, then each chain of prime ideals of T lying over the same prime ideal of R has at most 2|I| elements. A polynomial ring example shows that the preceding result is best-possible.


1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostas Hatzikiriakou

We assume that the reader is familiar with the program of “reverse mathematics” and the development of countable algebra in subsystems of second order arithmetic. The subsystems we are using in this paper are RCA0, WKL0 and ACA0. (The reader who wants to learn about them should study [1].) In [1] it was shown that the statement “Every countable commutative ring has a prime ideal” is equivalent to Weak Konig's Lemma over RCA0, while the statement “Every countable commutative ring has a maximal ideal” is equivalent to Arithmetic Comprehension over RCA0. Our main result in this paper is that the statement “Every countable commutative ring has a minimal prime ideal” is equivalent to Arithmetic Comprehension over RCA0. Minimal prime ideals play an important role in the study of countable commutative rings; see [2, pp. 1–7].


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Conway Adams

Let R be a commutative ring with non-zero identity and let K be the total quotient ring of R. We call R a G-ring if K is finitely generated as a ring over R. This generalizes Kaplansky′s definition of G-domain [5].Let Z(R) be the set of zero divisors in R. Following [7] elements of R—Z(R) and ideals of R containing at least one such element are called regular. Artin-Tate's characterization of Noetherian G-domains [1, Theorem 4] carries over with a slight adjustment to characterize a Noetherian G-ring as being semi-local in which every regular prime ideal has rank one.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 4767-4777
Author(s):  
Xin Zhou ◽  
◽  
Xiao Long Xin ◽  

<abstract><p>In this paper, we introduce the concept of (prime) ideals on neutrosophic extended triplet groups (NETGs) and investigate some related properties of them. Firstly, we give characterizations of ideals generated by some subsets, which lead to a construction of a NETG by endowing the set consisting of all ideals with a special multiplication. In addition, we show that the set consisting of all ideals is a distributive lattice. Finally, by introducing the topological structure on the set of all prime ideals on NETGs, we obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions for the prime ideal space to become a $ T_{1} $-space and a Hausdorff space. </p></abstract>


Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (16) ◽  
pp. 5125-5134
Author(s):  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Atul Gaur

Let R be a commutative ring with unity. The notion of ?-rings, ?-?-rings, and ?-?-rings is introduced which generalize the concept of ?-domains and ?-domains. A ring R is said to be a ?-ring if the set of all overrings of R is linearly ordered under inclusion. A ring R ? H is said to be a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, and a ?-?-ring if ?(R) is a ?-ring, where H is the set of all rings such that Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal of R and ? : T(R) ? RNil(R) is a ring homomorphism defined as ?(x) = x for all x ? T(R). The equivalence of ?-?-rings, ?-?-rings with the latest trending rings in the literature, namely, ?-chained rings and ?-Pr?fer rings is established under some conditions. Using the idealization theory of Nagata, examples are also given to strengthen the concept.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document