scholarly journals An e-Delphi Study to Identify Priority Areas for Education on Advance Care Planning in COPD Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-354
Author(s):  
Art Burgess Kelleher ◽  
Catherine Sweeney ◽  
Tony Foley ◽  
Ruth M Hally ◽  
Elaine Meehan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Vanderhaeghen ◽  
Inge Bossuyt ◽  
Johan Menten ◽  
Peter Rober

Background Advance Care Planning (ACP) communication is difficult to implement in hospital. Possibly this has to do with the fact that the concept is not well tuned to the needs of hospital professionals or that they experience implementation barriers in practice. Aims The aim of this study was to investigate what is valued in having ACP conversations by hospital professionals (physicians, nurses, psychologists and social workers) and what they experience as barriers and facilitating factors for having ACP conversations with patients. Methods A Delphi study consisting of two rounds with respectively 21 and 19 multidisciplinary experts from seven European countries was organised. Data were analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Results Participants agreed that ACP is valued mostly because it is seen to improve transmural continuation of care, emotional processing of the loss of a patient, and serenity at the end of life. Reported barriers are patient characteristics blocking patient-centred communication and a lack of knowledge to have these conversations. An important facilitator is multidisciplinary cooperation. Conclusions There is consensus by experts from different settings and countries suggesting that these results can theoretically be applied to hospital settings in Europe. This study reveals that hospital professionals value ACP in hospital practice, but that they encounter several barriers to its implementation.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002780
Author(s):  
Konrad Fassbender ◽  
Patricia Biondo ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Alexei Potapov ◽  
Tracy Lynn Wityk Martin ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn 2014, the province of Alberta, Canada implemented a province-wide policy and procedures for advance care planning (ACP) and goals of care designation (GCD) across its complex, integrated public healthcare system. This study was conducted to identify and operationalise performance indicators for ACP/GCD to monitor policy implementation success and sustainment of ACP/GCD practice change.MethodsA systematic review and environmental scan was conducted to identify potential indicators of ACP/GCD uptake (n=132). A purposive sample of ACP/GCD stakeholders was invited to participate in a modified Delphi study to evaluate, reduce and refine these indicators through a combination of face-to-face meetings and online surveys.ResultsAn evidence-informed Donabedian by Institute of Medicine (IOM) framework was adopted as an organising matrix for the indicators in an initial face-to-face meeting. Three online survey rounds reduced and refined the 132 indicators to 18. A final face-to-face meeting operationalised the indicators into a measurable format. Nine indicators, covering 11 of the 18 Donabedian×IOM domains, were operationalised.ConclusionsNine ACP/GCD evidence-informed indicators mapping to 11 of 18 Donabedian×IOM domains were endorsed, and have been operationalised into an online ACP/GCD dashboard. The indicators provide a characterisation of ACP/GCD uptake that could be generalised to other healthcare settings, measuring aspects related to ACP/GCD documentation, patient satisfaction and agreement between medical orders and care received. The final nine indicators reflect the stakeholders’ expressed intent to strike a balance between comprehensiveness and feasibility within a large provincial healthcare system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. e13-e14
Author(s):  
Konrad Fassbender ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Patricia Biondo ◽  
Malcena Stalker ◽  
Alex Potapov ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Sinclair ◽  
Jan R. Oyebode ◽  
R. Glynn Owens

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf J. Jox ◽  
Francesca Bosisio ◽  
Eve Rubli Truchard

Zusammenfassung. Die Palliative Care muss sich im Zuge des demographischen Wandels vieler Gesellschaften rund um den Globus tiefgreifend wandeln. Sie muss mehr und mehr mit der Geriatrie zusammenarbeiten und geriatrische Expertise integrieren. Eine der zentralen Herausforderungen Geriatrischer Palliative Care ist die ethisch angemessene Therapieentscheidung für Menschen, die nicht mehr urteilsfähig sind. Nachdem der bisherige Ansatz herkömmlicher Patientenverfügungen erwiesenermassen enttäuscht hat, wird aktuell, gerade auch in deutschsprachigen Ländern, das systemische Konzept des Advance Care Planning (ACP) verfolgt. In diesem Artikel wird zunächst ACP mit seinen Zielen, Elementen und Effekten vorgestellt. Sodann wird gezeigt, weshalb es für Menschen mit Demenz eines adaptierten ACP-Programms bedarf und was ein solches demenzspezifisches ACP beinhalten muss.


Praxis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (25) ◽  
pp. 1369-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Loupatatzis ◽  
Tanja Krones

Zusammenfassung. Advance Care Planning ist ein begleiteter, strukturierter Prozess, der es Patienten und ihren Angehörigen ermöglicht, sich mit ihren Einstellungen zu Leben und Sterben sowie möglichen Behandlungen für den Fall einer Urteilsunfähigkeit mit Hilfe eines ausgebildeten Beraters auseinander zu setzen. Das Konzept kombiniert die individuelle Beratung des Patienten mit einem regionalen, systemischen Ansatz, der sicherstellt, dass alle Beteiligten die verwendeten Dokumente kennen und auch in einer Notfallsituation korrekt anwenden können. Ziel ist es, die Behandlung von urteilsunfähigen Patienten besser im Sinne ihrer Wünsche und Bedürfnisse zu koordinieren und dadurch die Patientenautonomie zu stärken.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document