Stabilizations of High Temperature Heat Release CA50 and Combustion Period against Engine Load with the Dosage of Toluene in Fuel

Author(s):  
Gen Shibata ◽  
Tomonori Urushihara
2022 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Mohit Raj Saxena ◽  
Sahil Rana ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Maurya

Abstract This study presents the influence of low-temperature heat release (LTHR) and high-temperature heat release (HTHR) on the combustion and particle number characteristics of the RCCI engine. The study investigates the relationship between the amount of LTHR, HTHR, and particle number emission characteristics. In this study, gasoline and methanol are used as low reactivity fuel (LRF), and diesel is used as a high reactivity fuel (HRF). The LRF is injected into the intake manifold using a port-fuel injection (PFI) strategy, and HRF is directly injected into the cylinder using a direct injection strategy. A particle sizer is used to measure particle emission in size ranging from 5 to 1000 nm. Firstly, the LTHR and HTHR are analyzed for different diesel injection timing (SOI) for RCCI operation. Later, the variation of particle emissions with LTHR and HTHR is characterized. Additionally, empirical correlations are developed to understand the relation between the LTHR and HTHR with particle emission. Two-staged auto-ignition of charge has been observed in RCCI combustion. Results depict that LTHR varies with diesel injection timing and the phasing of HTHR depends on the amount and location of LTHR. Results also showed that HTHR and LTHR significantly influence the formation of particle number concentration in RCCI combustion. The developed empirical correlation depicts a good correlation between diesel SOI and the ratio of HTHR to LTHR to estimate total particle number concentration.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Shibata ◽  
Hideyuki Ogawa ◽  
Yasumasa Amanuma ◽  
Yuki Okamoto

The reduction of diesel combustion noise by multiple fuel injections maintaining high indicated thermal efficiency is an object of the research reported in this article. There are two aspects of multiple fuel injection effects on combustion noise reduction. One is the reduction of the maximum rate of pressure rise in each combustion, and the other is the noise reduction effects by the noise canceling spike combustion. The engine employed in the simulations and experiments is a supercharged, single-cylinder direct-injection diesel engine, with a high pressure common rail fuel injection system. Simulations to calculate the combustion noise and indicated thermal efficiency from the approximated heat release by Wiebe functions were developed. In two-stage high temperature heat release combustion, the combustion noise can be reduced; however, the combustion noise in amplification frequencies must be reduced to achieve further combustion noise reduction, and an additional heat release was added ahead of the two-stage high temperature heat release combustion in Test 1. The simulations of the resulting three-stage high temperature heat release combustion were conducted by changing the heating value of the first heat release. In Test 2 where the optimum heat release shape for low combustion noise and high indicated thermal efficiency was investigated and the role of each of the heat releases in the three-stage high temperature heat release combustion was discussed. In Test 3, a genetic-based algorithm method was introduced to avoid the time-consuming loss and great care in preparing the calculations in Test 2, and the optimum heat release shape and frequency characteristics for combustion noise by the genetic-based algorithm method were speedily calculated. The heat release occurs after the top dead center, and the indicated thermal efficiency and overall combustion noise were 50.5% and 86.4 dBA, respectively. Furthermore, the optimum number of fuel injections and heat release shape of multiple fuel injections to achieve lower combustion noise while maintaining the higher indicated thermal efficiency were calculated in Test 4. The results suggest that the constant pressure combustion after the top dead center by multiple fuel injections is the better way to lower combustion noise; however, the excess fuel injected leads to a lower indicated thermal efficiency because the degree of constant volume becomes deteriorates.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Shibata ◽  
Tomonori Urushihara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document