Effects of Isotopic Calibration Gases on IR Quantification Analyzer Techniques to Measure CO and CO2 in Engine Emissions Testing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuj Kumar ◽  
Bertold Arlitt ◽  
Tracey Jacksier
Keyword(s):  
Engine Emissions ◽  
Emissions Testing

A lab scale waste to energy conversion study for pyrolysis of plastic with and without catalyst: Engine emissions testing study

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 277 ◽  
pp. 118176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thokchom Subhaschandra Singh ◽  
Tikendra Nath Verma ◽  
Huirem Neeranjan Singh
Keyword(s):  
Energy Conversion ◽  
Waste To Energy ◽  
Engine Emissions ◽  
Conversion Study ◽  
Emissions Testing

EVALUATION OF ZERO-DIMENSIONAL CO AND NO ENGINE EMISSIONS MODELS AND THEIR SUITABILITY FOR E10

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oswaldo Franca ◽  
Rogério Gonçalves dos Santos ◽  
Clayton Zabeu ◽  
Mario Martins
Keyword(s):  
Engine Emissions

scholarly journals Analysis of Driving Dynamics Considering Driving Resistances in On-Road Driving

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3408
Author(s):  
Jingeun Song ◽  
Junepyo Cha
Keyword(s):  
Combustion Engine ◽  
Vehicle Speed ◽  
Driving Dynamic ◽  
Engine Emissions ◽  
Engine Load ◽  
Positive Acceleration ◽  
Emission Regulations ◽  
Transportation Emissions ◽  
Light Duty Vehicles ◽  
Dynamic Variables

Internal combustion engine emissions are a serious worldwide problem. To combat this, emission regulations have become stricter with the goal of reducing the proportion of transportation emissions in global air pollution. In addition, the European Commission passed the real driving emissions–light-duty vehicles (RDE-LDV) regulation that evaluates vehicle emissions by driving on real roads. The RDE test is significantly dependent on driving conditions such as traffic or drivers. Thus, the RDE regulation has the means to evaluate driving dynamics such as the vehicle speed per acceleration (v·apos) and the relative positive acceleration (RPA) to determine whether the driving during these tests is normal or abnormal. However, this is not an appropriate way to assess the driving dynamics because the v⋅apos and the RPA do not represent engine load, which is directly related to exhaust emissions. Therefore, in the present study, new driving dynamic variables are proposed. These variables use engine acceleration calculated from wheel force instead of the acceleration calculated from the vehicle speed, so they are proportional to the engine load. In addition, a variable of driving dynamics during braking is calculated using the negative wheel force. This variable can be used to improve the accuracy of the emission assessment by analyzing the braking pattern.

Prediction of aircraft engine emissions using ADS-B flight data

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
A. Filippone ◽  
B. Parkes ◽  
N. Bojdo ◽  
T. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Water Vapour ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Aircraft Engine ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Engine Emissions ◽  
Flight Data ◽  
Seasonal Basis ◽  
Emissions Inventories ◽  
Aviation Emissions

ABSTRACT Real-time flight data from the Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) has been integrated, through a data interface, with a flight performance computer program to predict aviation emissions at altitude. The ADS-B, along with data from Mode-S, are then used to ‘fly’ selected long-range aircraft models (Airbus A380-841, A330-343 and A350-900) and one turboprop (ATR72). Over 2,500 flight trajectories have been processed to demonstrate the integration between databases and software systems. Emissions are calculated for altitudes greater than 3,000 feet (609m) and exclude landing and take-off cycles. This proof of concept fills a gap in the aviation emissions inventories, since it uses real-time flights and produces estimates at a very granular level. It can be used to analyse emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide ( $\mathrm{CO}_2$ ), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides ( $\mathrm{NO}_x$ ) and water vapour on a specific route (city pair), for a specific aircraft, for an entire fleet, or on a seasonal basis. It is shown how $\mathrm{NO}_x$ and water vapour emissions concentrate around tropospheric altitudes only for long-range flights, and that the cruise range is the biggest discriminator in the absolute value of these and other exhaust emissions.

scholarly journals State of Art of Using Biofuels in Spark Ignition Engines

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 779
Author(s):  
Ashraf Elfasakhany
Keyword(s):  
Engine Performance ◽  
Spark Ignition ◽  
Pollutant Emissions ◽  
Spark Ignition Engines ◽  
Engine Emissions ◽  
Cold Starting ◽  
Starting Conditions ◽  
Unburned Hydrocarbons ◽  
Scientific Attention ◽  
State Of Art

Biofuels are receiving increased scientific attention, and recently different biofuels have been proposed for spark ignition engines. This paper presents the state of art of using biofuels in spark ignition engines (SIE). Different biofuels, mainly ethanol, methanol, i-butanol-n-butanol, and acetone, are blended together in single dual issues and evaluated as renewables for SIE. The biofuels were compared with each other as well as with the fossil fuel in SIE. Future biofuels for SIE are highlighted. A proposed method to reduce automobile emissions and reformulate the emissions into new fuels is presented and discussed. The benefits and weaknesses of using biofuels in SIE are summarized. The study established that ethanol has several benefits as a biofuel for SIE; it enhanced engine performance and decreased pollutant emissions significantly; however, ethanol showed some drawbacks, which cause problems in cold starting conditions and, additionally, the engine may suffer from a vapor lock situation. Methanol also showed improvements in engine emissions/performance similarly to ethanol, but it is poisonous biofuel and it has some sort of incompatibility with engine materials/systems; its being miscible with water is another disadvantage. The lowest engine performance was displayed by n-butanol and i-butanol biofuels, and they also showed the greatest amount of unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) and CO emissions, but the lowest greenhouse effect. Ethanol and methanol introduced the highest engine performance, but they also showed the greatest CO2 emissions. Acetone introduced a moderate engine performance and the best/lowest CO and UHC emissions. Single biofuel blends are also compared with dual ones, and the results showed the benefits of the dual ones. The study concluded that the next generation of biofuels is expected to be dual blended biofuels. Different dual biofuel blends are also compared with each other, and the results showed that the ethanol–methanol (EM) biofuel is superior in comparison with n-butanol–i-butanol (niB) and i-butanol–ethanol (iBE).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document