Financial crises and economic theory

2021 ◽  
pp. 124-135
Author(s):  
Victor A. Beker
2021 ◽  
pp. 309-345
Author(s):  
Michael Peneder ◽  
Andreas Resch

While the previous chapter highlighted the resurgence of Schumpeter’s concept of money in economic theory, this chapter focuses on three examples from recent economic history in which the interdependence of finance and innovation invokes a deliberate Schumpeterian interpretation. The first example is about the striking rise of modern venture capital in Schumpeter’s immediate geographical and intellectual environment during his years at Harvard, to which he contributed a consistent intellectual frame (also through his personal ties with people like David Rockefeller, Frank Taussig, or George Doriot). The second example addresses the recurrent instances of financial crises, in particular the Great Recession of 2008-09, and invokes a Schumpeterian interpretation mainly via the instability theorem of his student Hyman Minsky. Finally, we turn to the stream of innovations that relate to the increasing digitalisation of money ranging from cryptocoins to central bank digital currencies (CBDC).


European View ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
Giacomo E. Vaciago

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 242-243

Malcolm Sawyer of Leeds University Business School reviews “Why Minsky Matters: An Introduction to the Work of a Maverick Economist”, by L. Randall Wray. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Provides an introduction to Hyman P. Minsky's alternative approach to economic theory and policy, including his writings on the causes of financial crises and his vision of an economy that is not necessarily equilibrium-seeking. Discusses an overview of Minsky's main contributions; macroeconomics, where it went wrong, and the road not taken; Minsky's early contributions—the financial instability hypothesis; Minsky's views on money and banking; Minsky's approach to poverty and unemployment; Minsky and the Global Financial Crisis; Minsky and financial reform; and reforms to promote stability, democracy, security, and equality.”


2021 ◽  
pp. 82-104
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Schenk

The 2008 crisis was a boon to the discipline of economic history and created an appetite for ‘lessons from the past’ by academics as well as policy-makers as they sought to respond to the failure of economic theory to anticipate the crisis. But beyond this intense example, can we make conclusions about the pathway to impact for historical treatments? Is there something especially inspiring or impactful about the 1930s? Does the widespread awareness that there was an interwar Great Depression and that it was terrible and that it may have contributed to the Second World War mean that it has particular resonance when it is invoked by policy-makers? How has the past been used in anticipation of (rather than reaction to) financial crises? Examining two episodes, this chapter demonstrates the use of the past as a parable for current and future policy and as a rehearsal for a future crisis.


Author(s):  
Ioannis Kokkoris ◽  
Rodrigo Olivares-Caminal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document