Distinguishing parental alienation from child abuse and adverse parenting

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-137
Author(s):  
Madelyn Simring Milchman
2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 1749-1767
Author(s):  
Lenore E. A. Walker

Family courts have rarely considered how their decisions are perpetuating domestic violence and child abuse in the many cases where custody disputes are before them. Rather than judges playing King Solomon themselves, they frequently leave the decision making to mental health professionals and lawyers whose credentials rarely include an understanding of what is needed to recognize, stop current abuse and prevent future violence. This article employs a literature review to examine the consequences of this decision making. Research shows that both male and female judges are skeptical of mothers’ claims of abuse and that their opinions contain negative stereotypes of women on which theories of parental alienation are based. More frighteningly, when guardians-ad-Litem or Custody Evaluators were entrusted with these decisions, research shows an intensification of the courts’ skepticism toward mothers’—but not fathers’—claims of abuse. Traditional family court procedures continue the serious risk of harm to women and children by minimizing domestic violence and child abuse, often using unproven and unscientific alienation theories as an excuse not to protect them. The article concludes with a discussion of the role specialty courts that employ therapeutic jurisprudence can play in improving this process for children.


2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-203
Author(s):  
Penny Lewis†

Abstract. From my training with Marian Chace came much of the roots of my employment of dance therapy in my work. The use of empathic movement reflection assisted me in the development of the technique of somatic countertransference ( Lewis, 1984 , 1988 , 1992 ) and in the choreography of the symbiotic phase in object relations ( Lewis, 1983 , 1987a , 1988 , 1990 , 1992 ). Marian provided the foundation for assistance in separation and individuation through the use of techniques which stimulated skin (body) and external (kinespheric) boundary formation. Reciprocal embodied response and the use of thematic imaginal improvisations provided the foundation for the embodied personification of intrapsychic phenomena such as the internalized patterns, inner survival mechanisms, addictions, and the inner child. Chace’s model assisted in the development of structures for the remembering, re-experiencing, and healing of child abuse as well as the rechoreography of object relations. Finally, Marian Chace’s use of synchronistic group postural rhythmic body action provided access to the transformative power of ritual in higher stages of individuation and spiritual consciousness.


Psychotherapy ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Arcaya ◽  
Gwendolyn L. Gerber
Keyword(s):  

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-791
Author(s):  
Gary B. Melton
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-303
Author(s):  
Byron Egeland
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document