Differentiated Curriculum and Instruction for Advanced and Gifted Learners

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra N. Kaplan
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mantak Yuen ◽  
Serene Chan ◽  
Cheri Chan ◽  
Dennis CL Fung ◽  
Wai Ming Cheung ◽  
...  

Gifted students usually require much less time spent in practising and revising basic skills; instead, they benefit greatly from opportunities to work through the curriculum at a faster pace (acceleration). Teachers currently working with mixed-ability classes do not always find it easy to differentiate their teaching approach in this way, so there is a need to facilitate in-service professional development to provide teachers with practical strategies for implementing effective differentiation for gifted learners. In response, a project for primary school teachers was organized by a university in Hong Kong. The purposes of the project were (a) to enhance the confidence of teachers in planning and delivering differentiated lessons in specific key learning areas (KLAs) with particular reference to gifted students; (b) to empower teachers with knowledge and strategies necessary for designing and implementing a differentiated curriculum in KLA domains and (c) to establish a professional development practice that connects local academics with schools and teachers. The project was implemented by inviting curriculum leaders, panel chairpersons and subject teachers from primary schools to attend a 3-hour lecture and a 6-hour workshop in which differentiation practices were explored. The project was later evaluated based on feedback from participants and university consultants. Overall, the feedback was positive, but suggestions are provided here for enhancing future projects of a similar nature.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Ann Tomlinson

Educators of the gifted rationalize offering special curricula for gifted learners based on (a) the nature of the learning environment established for these learners; (b) constructivist principles of content, process, and product; and/or (c) use of a range of instructional strategies associated with programs for gifted learners. General educators find such defenses for gifted education little more than an argument for “good education.” This essay proposes an alternate model of curriculum and instruction suited to advanced learners. Use of such a model should strengthen both educational practice and research focused on talent development in gifted students.


2021 ◽  
pp. 509-539
Author(s):  
Joyce VanTassel-Baska ◽  
Jason S. McIntosh ◽  
Kelly L. Kearney

1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
CH Boozer ◽  
RH Rasmussen

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 772-773
Author(s):  
Nancy Ewald Jackson
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nadine Ballam ◽  
Anne Sturgess

In February 2018, a full-time provider of gifted education opened in New Zealand with its initial cohort of children. This provider catered for learners from ages 1-15 years who did not ‘fit’ in mainstream education settings. This paper reports on a research project that focused on the effectiveness of the learning approach at this school in its inaugural year. Two sources of data informed this research, including semi-structured interviews with parents and learning and support staff, and an analysis of documents related to the philosophy, curriculum, and learning approach. This paper reports on benefits and limitations of the learning approach identified by the parent participants in the study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina R. Kaul ◽  
Brenda K. Davis

In 2015, the U.S. Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) that included provisions to support gifted and talented learners. The U.S. Department of Education’s Consolidated State Plan template only required states to directly address the inclusion of gifted education under Title II, Part A: Supporting Effective Instruction (Section 2101(d)(2)(J)). We examined the inclusion of gifted education in the Title II section of all 52 submitted ESSA plans. Of the approved plans, 16 states explicitly addressed how educators would be supported in identifying and providing gifted learners with effective instruction, and 15 states generally described educator support to meet the needs of multiple groups of students (including gifted). Three of the approved state plans did not mention support for gifted education in their Title II responses. Gifted education stakeholders must be familiar with their state’s plan and understand how Title II can fund professional development for gifted education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document