The Differential Ability Scales (Das) Word Reading Test

Author(s):  
Martin Turner
1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Oliver Platt ◽  
Randy W. Kamphaus ◽  
Joan Keltgen ◽  
Fran Gilliland

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 563-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V. Daleo ◽  
Brian R. Lopez ◽  
Jason C. Cole ◽  
Alan S. Kaufman ◽  
Nadeen L. Kaufman ◽  
...  

Horn's distinction between fluid intelligence (Gf) and visualization (Gv) was investigated with two Nonverbal Reasoning subtests from the Differential Ability Scales and three Simultaneous Processing subtests from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. The sample comprised a predominantly Euro-American group of 57 normal boys and girls between the ages of 6 and 12 years. Principal factor analysis yielded clear-cut Gf and Gv dimensions. The Gf factor was composed both of Differential Ability Scales and Kaufman–ABC subtests, suggesting that the construct of simultaneous processing is not merely a measure of Gv, as some researchers have hypothesized, but also measures Horn's Gf fluid intelligence to a considerable extent.


Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Cain ◽  
Kelly Coulehan ◽  
Ida Sue Baron

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac T. Petersen ◽  
John E. Bates ◽  
Angela D. Staples

AbstractPrevious research has found associations but not established mechanisms of developmental linkage between language ability and inattentive–hyperactive (I-H) behavior problems. The present study examined whether self-regulation mediates the effect of language ability on later I-H behavior problems among young children (N = 120) assessed at 30, 36, and 42 months of age. Cross-lagged panel models tested the direction of effect between language ability and self-regulation and longitudinal effects of language ability on later I-H problems mediated by self-regulation. Language ability was measured by children's scores on the receptive and expressive language subtests of the Differential Ability Scales. Self-regulation was measured by three behavioral tasks requiring inhibitory control. I-H problems were reported by parents and secondary caregivers. Language ability predicted later self-regulation as measured by all three tasks. There was no association, however, between self-regulation and later language ability, suggesting that the direction of effect was stronger from language ability to later self-regulation. Moreover, the effect of language ability on later I-H behavior problems was mediated by children's self-regulation in one of the tasks (for secondary caregivers' but not parents' ratings). Findings suggest that language deficits may explain later I-H behavior problems via their prediction of poorer self-regulatory skills.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Osmon ◽  
Elizabeth Plambeck ◽  
Liesa Klein ◽  
Quintino Mano

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-144
Author(s):  
Włodzimierz Płotek ◽  
Marcin Cybulski ◽  
Marta Łockiewicz ◽  
Marta Bogdanowicz ◽  
Anna Kluzik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document