Science Lab WATER BOTTLE ROCKET

2021 ◽  
pp. 110-111
Author(s):  
Stephanie Bearce
Keyword(s):  
BMJ ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 1 (4920) ◽  
pp. 1030-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. London
Keyword(s):  

Burns ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Lapid ◽  
Shlomo Walfisch
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 313 (6) ◽  
pp. F1274-F1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Chen ◽  
Lanlan Zhang ◽  
Warren G. Hill ◽  
Weiqun Yu

The voiding spot assay (VSA) on filter paper is an increasingly popular method for studying lower urinary tract physiology in mice. However, the ways VSAs are performed differ significantly between laboratories, and many variables are introduced compared with the mouse’s normal housing situation. Rodents are intelligent social animals, and it is increasingly understood that social and environmental stresses have significant effects on their physiology. Surprisingly, little is known about whether change of environment during VSA affects mouse voiding and what the best methodologies are for retaining “natural” micturition patterns. It is well known that stress-related neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor is significantly elevated and induces dramatic voiding changes when rodents encounter stresses. Therefore we hypothesized that changes in the environmental situation could potentially alter voiding during VSA. We have examined multiple factors to test whether they affect female mouse voiding patterns during VSA, including cage type, cage floor, water availability, water bottle location, single or group housing, and different handlers. Our results indicate that mice are surprisingly sensitive to changes in cage type and floor surface, water bottle location, and single/group housing, each of which induces significant changes in voiding patterns, indicative of a stress response. In contrast, neither changing handler nor 4 h of water deprivation affected voiding patterns. Our data indicate that VSA should be performed under conditions as close as possible to the mouse’s normal housing. Optimizing VSA methodology will be useful in uncovering voiding alterations in both genetic and disease models of lower urinary dysfunctions.


Antiquity ◽  
1937 ◽  
Vol 11 (44) ◽  
pp. 482-483
Author(s):  
J.R. Stewart
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 17090-17110
Author(s):  
Cristiane Araujo dos Santos Silva ◽  
Sabino Alves de Aguiar Neto ◽  
José Victor Brasil de Souza ◽  
Fábio Augusto Silva Machado ◽  
Mateus Antônio Nogueira Oliveira ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Kurokura ◽  
Tamayo Matsumoto ◽  
Kenji Namba ◽  
Shigeru Aoki

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
FABIANA NERBASS ◽  
Cintia Santo ◽  
Edilaine Fialek ◽  
Viviane Calice-Siva ◽  
Marcos Vieira

Abstract Background and Aims Hydration and toilet behavior at work are associated with urinary tract symptoms (UTs) and infection (UTI) in women. We aimed to evaluate the association between self-reported hydration habits, water access and toilet adequacy at work with UTs and UTI in female workers from five dialysis clinics in Southern Brazil. Method All women employed were invited (n=258), and 69.4% (n=179) agreed to participate. For this analysis, we included female workers employed for at least 12 months who were not pregnant or breastfeeding in the last year. Weekly work shift varied from 30 to 42 hours, divided into five or six weekdays. Participants answered an online questionnaire comprising questions regarding UTs (burning feeling; frequent or intense urge to urinate; bloody urine; lower abdomen pain) and UTI episodes in the last year; usual daily beverage intake, usual urine frequency and color according to urine color chart; water access and toilet adequacy perception at work. Workers were divided into two groups according to the employee permission in having a water bottle (WB) at the workplace. Administrative and multidisciplinary staff are allowed (WB group) and nurse staff can not have (non-WB group) due to infection control regulation in dialysis rooms. Results We included 133 women (age=36.9±9.5 years old). Self-reported usual daily beverage intake= 6.6±2.9 cups/day (∼1320 ml); daily urine frequency= 5.1±2.1; urine color chart score= 3.0±1.2. At least one UTs was reported by 53% (n=70) and UTI episode by 34% (n=45) in the last year. Participants with UTs had a lower urine frequency (4.7±2.3 versus 5.5±1.7 times/day; P=0.03) and a higher urine color score (3.3±1.2 versus 2.6±1.1;P=0.002). Non-WB workers (N=66/49.6%) reported a lower beverage intake (6.0±2.6 versus 7.3±3.0 cups/day;P=0.01), had a higher prevalence of UTs (65% versus 45%; P=0.02) and UTI (42% versus 25%; P=0.04). Among non-WB participants, 47% considered that the distance to water supply from the workplace spot impairs adequate hydration, and 39% answered that the number of toilets available also as a barrier. A higher prevalence of UTs was reported by these subgroups that perceived environment infrastructure barriers (77% versus 54%; P=0.04 and 92% versus 47%; P<0.001, respectively). Non-WB who responded that toilet hygiene impairs hydration (11%) had a higher prevalence of UTI (86% versus 37%; P=0.03). No significant association between work environment perception and urinary problems was found in the WB group. Conclusion Lower urine frequency and darker urine color were associated with UTs in this population. Workers who do not have a water bottle at the workplace reported a lower beverage intake, higher UTs and UTI prevalence. Non-WB participants that perceived work barriers to adequate hydration had a higher prevalence of urinary problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document