Meeting Facilitation

2022 ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Steve Berta ◽  
Howard Blonsky ◽  
James Wogan
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 667-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana S. Vivacqua ◽  
Leandro Carreira Marques ◽  
Marcos S. Ferreira ◽  
Jano M. de Souza
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephenson J. Beck ◽  
Robert S. Littlefield ◽  
Andrea J. Weber

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Niederman ◽  
Roger J. Volkema
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Adriana S. Vivacqua ◽  
Leandro Carreira Marques ◽  
Marcos S. Ferreira ◽  
Jano M. de Souza

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalla M. Miranda ◽  
Robert P. Bostrom

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-421
Author(s):  
Yo Azama

In this modern society, a successful team is defined by how well it embraces inclusivity and diversity practices. In order to build a community in which such practice is the norm, first we must establish the environment where each team member can bring his thoughts without fear of judgement, suspension of her own perceptions, seek opportunities to stretch perspectives, and equity of voice is ensured. Such a professional learning community requires clear purpose, shared values, and mindful meeting facilitation. The success of a PLC results in the team's collective efficacy as Albert Bandura defines "a group's shared belief in its conjoint capability to organize and excute the courses of action required to produce given levels of attainment" (1997). We must pay close attention to how to establish a PLC that is inclusive and seeks diverse viewpoints, and cultivates our inner selves while developing communication skills to understand and be understood.


Author(s):  
Pak Yoong ◽  
Brent Gallupe

Although electronic face-to-face meetings are increasingly being used by organizations to improve the productivity of their strategic planning teams, design task forces, quality circles, sales management, and other organizational groups (Alavi, 1993; Dishman & Aytes, 1996), the rate of adoption of the technologies to support these meetings appears to be slowing (Grise & Gallupe, forthcoming). A possible reason for this reduced rate of adoption may be the difficulty in training competent electronic meeting facilitators. These facilitators play a key role in electronic meetings that use computer-based group technologies or group support systems (GSS) to assist the group in tasks such as generating ideas, evaluating alternatives and developing action plans. The purpose of this chapter is to describe how an action learning approach was used to train traditional meeting facilitators in the tools, techniques and processes of electronic meeting facilitation. This chapter begins with a description of action learning, in particular the three schools of action learning. The second section explains the nature of the “experiential” school of action learning and the GSS facilitation training program used in a research project in which 15 facilitators, already experienced in conventional meetings, were trained to become facilitators of electronic meetings. The final sections describe some lessons learned and implications for organizations training their electronic meeting facilitators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document