Team Teaching in PBL

Project-based learning (PBL) is a challenging learning methodology, also for teachers, questioning common assumptions of teachers, like control over the classroom and reliance on expert knowledge. Most challenging is teamwork. Team teaching has been explored in many disciplinary areas, both in traditional as well as in PBL curricula. Teachers may feel uncomfortable with sharing knowledge and being assessed by students and peers. This chapter explores characteristics of team teaching in a PBL context through two consecutive literature reviews. The first seeks to characterise team teaching and its meaning to teachers, zooming in from team teaching in general to team teaching in a PBL context in engineering education. The second connects this characterization to the experiences of a specific PBL teaching team in an engineering context, resulting in insights in experiences at practitioners' level. The authors argue that successful team teaching is crucial for the success of PBL in engineering education and is important as an example for students to engage in collaboration.

Something Old or Something New?

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced organizations to adjust co-located teams to virtual teams instantly. The applicability of known success factors for virtual teamwork to this situation is uncertain. Therefore, this study addresses the following research question: what factors relate to successful team adjustment to the new virtual work context? We hypothesize that perceived team success is influenced by individual and team factors and that these effects of team-related factors on perceived team success are moderated by team processes and team-/task-technology fit. A time-lagged online study was conducted at two timepoints during the initial lockdown in Germany with N = 110 employees working in teams. We found trust, task-technology fit, and communication to be significantly associated with perceived team performance. The results suggest that the instant adjustment might have led to a new phase related to team cycle episodes. We propose guidelines to prepare teams for future instant adjustments.

KONSOLIDASI GERAKAN MILENIAL INDONESIA DALAM UPAYA MEMENANGKAN PASANGAN PRABOWO – SANDIAGA UNO DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN 2019 DI KABUPATEN SIDOARJO

This study aimed to determine the tendencies carried out by GMI Sidoarjo in the 2019 presidential election. GMI Sidoarjo is one of the community organizations that acts as a successful team winning the pair of candidates in the 2019 presidential election. This research is descriptive qualitative by using the theory of political participation from Samuel Huntington and Nelson. From the results of the study obtained several results, namely political participation carried out are collective, organized, legal and ineffective. Consolidation is done internally and externally. Then, the form of political participation in conducting elections is carried out with political discussion, outreach, campaigning and vote escort. The winning effort was unsuccessful, so the pair supported by the Indonesian Millennial Movement in Sidoarjo was defeated due to the lack of targeted support in fighting for votes in the 2019 presidential election.

The Inference of Transparency in Effective Team Management In the IT Industry

<div>A transparent working environment has been observed to have a momentous impact in making teams more effective, happy, and creative (Scholl, 2019). It helps develop consistent communication, apparent and authentic workplaces which help the team to feel secure and proposes ideas enhancing inventiveness (Lencion, 2016). This study examines if there was a significant relationship between a transparent work environment and a sort of creative, effective, and productive functional team in the IT industry that delivers the job in time and within budget without compromising quality. To this end, a questionnaire has been remitted to such a successful team of IT professionals working under various capacities for a software developing company within the IT Industry. GPower and Jamovi have been used to determine the sample size population and analyze the data gathered thru a questionnaire to fetch the purpose of the study. The finding exhibits that there is a significant relationship between the transparent work environment and the creativity, accountability, and productivity.<br></div>

The Inference of Transparency in Effective Team Management In the IT Industry

<div>A transparent working environment has been observed to have a momentous impact in making teams more effective, happy, and creative (Scholl, 2019). It helps develop consistent communication, apparent and authentic workplaces which help the team to feel secure and proposes ideas enhancing inventiveness (Lencion, 2016). This study examines if there was a significant relationship between a transparent work environment and a sort of creative, effective, and productive functional team in the IT industry that delivers the job in time and within budget without compromising quality. To this end, a questionnaire has been remitted to such a successful team of IT professionals working under various capacities for a software developing company within the IT Industry. GPower and Jamovi have been used to determine the sample size population and analyze the data gathered thru a questionnaire to fetch the purpose of the study. The finding exhibits that there is a significant relationship between the transparent work environment and the creativity, accountability, and productivity.<br></div>

Trust repair in human-agent teams: the effectiveness of explanations and expressing regret

The role of intelligent agents becomes more social as they are expected to act in direct interaction, involvement and/or interdependency with humans and other artificial entities, as in Human-Agent Teams (HAT). The highly interdependent and dynamic nature of teamwork demands correctly calibrated trust among team members. Trust violations are an inevitable aspect of the cycle of trust and since repairing damaged trust proves to be more difficult than building trust initially, effective trust repair strategies are needed to ensure durable and successful team performance. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of different trust repair strategies from an intelligent agent by measuring the development of human trust and advice taking in a Human-Agent Teaming task. Data for this study were obtained using a task environment resembling a first-person shooter game. Participants carried out a mission in collaboration with their artificial team member. A trust violation was provoked when the agent failed to detect an approaching enemy. After this, the agent offered one of four trust repair strategies, composed of the apology components explanation and expression of regret (either one alone, both or neither). Our results indicated that expressing regret was crucial for effective trust repair. After trust declined due to the violation by the agent, trust only significantly recovered when an expression of regret was included in the apology. This effect was stronger when an explanation was added. In this context, the intelligent agent was the most effective in its attempt of rebuilding trust when it provided an apology that was both affective, and informational. Finally, the implications of our findings for the design and study of Human-Agent trust repair are discussed.

Team Science: A Practical Approach to Starting Collaborative Projects

A collaborative approach to treating patients is well taught in medical training. However, collaboration and team building in clinical and laboratory research may have been given less emphasis. More scientific discoveries are now being made with multidisciplinary teams, requiring a thoughtful approach in order to achieve research goals while mitigating potential conflicts. Specific steps for a successful team science project include building the team, assigning roles and responsibilities, allocating rules, and discussing authorship guidelines. Building a team involves bringing individuals together and developing a common research goal while establishing psychological safety for all members of the team. Clear assignment of roles and responsibilities avoids confusion and allows each member’s contributions to be acknowledged. Allocating rules involves discussing how decisions in the team will be made, how data and knowledge sharing will occur, and how potential conflicts will be resolved. Discussing authorship at the start of the project ensures that the entire team knows what work must be completed for authorship to be obtained.

Hargomulyo Citizens 'Obstacles in Choosing a Leader

Citizen Hargomulyo has determined a leader which can be expected to protect its people is more when commutation moment hence people surely hope the leader which will be better in holding governance wheel. At this opportunity is writer starts from a survey later; then communicates with the society either through direct and also through passing media social later; then does conduct this research with the descriptive method qualitative. Hence at this opportunity is a writer will pare and explain what citizen resistance in choosing a leader. Candidate resistance is: Less be recognized although often have socialization to 5%. Socialization less 7%, A lot of promise 13%. Experience in society 4%. Less go into society 9%. Successful Team does not solicit 10%. graceless Successful Team 9%. in government 7%. Education 4% campaign Negative 17% and kinds of resistance in the content of according to elector experience 6%.

Leveraging historiometry to better understand teams in context

The prevalence of teams in organizational settings has dramatically increased over the last 50 years, and as such, researchers have made much progress in understanding the conditions and intra-team dynamics that facilitate successful team performance. However, much remains to be learned due to the complexity of teams. This complexity often makes it difficult to study teams operating in context, especially when trying to examine longitudinal aspects of teams. Adding to this difficulty, studying teams in context is resource intensive and access is often a key barrier, especially if the focus is on teams that are elite or that operate in extreme environments. This drives a need to look outside the traditional methodological tools typically utilized to study teams. Thereby, the purpose of this manuscript is to highlight a method that while not typically utilized in the team literature can offer benefits when exploring team dynamics in context—historiometry.

Management of generation Z staff in the digital economy

This article is a continuation, which examines the difference between generations and their common qualities for forming a successful team, but with a focus on generation Z. Materials on the comparison of generations X and Y are published in the journal Vestnik PNIPUV in the article Team building in the digital economy [1]. This article presents an analysis of the current state of generations X and Y with the relevant research points and recommendations for team building of personnel of generations X and Y. In 2019, at the time of the publication of the first part of the article, our team started a project to conduct their research in the part of Generation Z. Participants in this study were young people born between 2003 and 2005. The study ended in January 2021. A total of 1,14 people were interviewed during the period: high school students, university students, and first-and second-year students of universities in the cities of Moscow, Samara, Nizhny Novgorod, Novokuibyshevsk, Syzran.