Political and Administrative Complexity in Governing Central City Schools

Author(s):  
Marilyn Tallerico
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Peterson ◽  
Jay P. Greene

1925 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-320
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  
The City ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-16
Author(s):  
Brian Kovalesky

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, during the height of protests and actions by civil rights activists around de facto school segregation in the Los Angeles area, the residents of a group of small cities just southeast of the City of Los Angeles fought to break away from the Los Angeles City Schools and create a new, independent school district—one that would help preserve racially segregated schools in the area. The “Four Cities” coalition was comprised of residents of the majority white, working-class cities of Vernon, Maywood, Huntington Park, and Bell—all of which had joined the Los Angeles City Schools in the 1920s and 1930s rather than continue to operate local districts. The coalition later expanded to include residents of the cities of South Gate, Cudahy, and some unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, although Vernon was eventually excluded. The Four Cities coalition petitioned for the new district in response to a planned merger of the Los Angeles City Schools—until this time comprised of separate elementary and high school districts—into the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). The coalition's strategy was to utilize a provision of the district unification process that allowed citizens to petition for reconfiguration or redrawing of boundaries. Unification was encouraged by the California State Board of Education and legislature in order to combine the administrative functions of separate primary and secondary school districts—the dominant model up to this time—to better serve the state's rapidly growing population of children and their educational needs, and was being deliberated in communities across the state and throughout Los Angeles County. The debates at the time over school district unification in the Greater Los Angeles area, like the one over the Four Cities proposal, were inextricably tied to larger issues, such as taxation, control of community institutions, the size and role of state and county government, and racial segregation. At the same time that civil rights activists in the area and the state government alike were articulating a vision of public schools that was more inclusive and demanded larger-scale, consolidated administration, the unification process reveals an often-overlooked grassroots activism among residents of the majority white, working-class cities surrounding Los Angeles that put forward a vision of exclusionary, smaller-scale school districts based on notions of local control and what they termed “community identity.”


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Septi Kurniawati Nurhadi

Abstract : Pajeksan and Jogonegaran kampongs are located in central city of Yogyakarta, while the lurung Pajeksan – Jogonegaran kampongs is the border as well as the main axis for the people living that are currently evolving as the houses for workers in the Malioboro area. The beneficial usage of the lurung has grown as the fulfillment of the people’s need for food. The usage is increasing and posing an intervention on the lurung space. This research is aimed to discover the use and the influence of culinary transaction space, culinary activity and form of element transaction space in the community of lurung Pajeksan - Jogonegaran kampongs. This is done by using the Behavior mapping. The result of identifying and analyzing is use to obtain the special characteristic that happen in the society so that they are able to keep their existence. The usage patterns of public space as the culinary transaction space in lurung Pajeksan - Jogonegaran kampongs is linier and it follows the shape of an elongated lurung with the greatest usage occurs at the junction of the driveway towards the kampongs. The usage of the lurung is directly related to the aspect of environment, neighborhood, and economic aspectKeyword : Lurung Pajeksan – Jogonegaran,The Usage of Lurung, and Culinary Transaction Space Abstrak: Kampung Pajeksan dan Jogonegaran merupakan dua kampung yang terletak di pusat kota Yogyakarta, sedangkan lurung kampung Pajeksan – Jogonegaran merupakan batas sekaligus menjadi poros utama kehidupan warga yang saat ini kampung tersebut berkembang sebagai hunian bagi pekerja di kawasan Malioboro. Pemanfaatan lurung berkembang sebagai pemenuhan kebutuhan pangan warga kampung. Pemanfaatan tersebut kian meningkat dan menimbulkan intervensi ruang pada badan lurung. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemanfaatan dan pengaruh wadah transaksi kuliner, aktivitas kuliner serta elemen pembentuk wadah transaksi yang dilakukan masyarakat pada lurung kampung Pajeksan–Jogonegaran. Hal tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode Behavior mapping. Hasil identifikasi dan analisis tersebut digunakan untuk memperoleh kekhasan yang terjadi dalam masyarakat sehingga dapat mempertahankan keberlangsungannya. Pola pemanfaatan ruang publik sebagai wadah transaksi kuliner yang terdapat pada lurung kampung Pajeksan – Jogonegaran berbentuk linier memanjang yang mengikuti bentuk lurung dengan pemanfaatan terbesar terjadi pada persimpangan menuju jalan masuk kampung. Pemanfaatan tersebut tidak terlepas dari aspek lingkungan,ketetanggaan,dan ekonomi.Kata Kunci: Lurung kampung Pajeksan - Jogonegaran, Pemanfaatan lurung, dan Wadah Transaksi Kuliner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document