Subsistence Agriculture & Economic Development

Author(s):  
Clifton R. Wharton
Economica ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 39 (153) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
P. Ingham Ayre ◽  
Clifton R. Wharton

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Fernando

The indigenous population in Java, it is generally believed, remained by and large subsistence peasants under the colonial rule in the nineteenth century. It is argued that the Javanese could not participate in the estate plantation industry or ‘transform their general pattern of already intensive farming in an extensive direction, for they lacked capital, had no way to shuck off excess labor’. Their access to waste land to became restricted and consequently they sought refuge in the wet-rice cultivation which ‘soaked up almost the whole of the’ population in a process of ‘agricultural involution’, which ‘went on steadily’ during the nineteenthcentury.’ Thus Javanese were confined to the subsistence agriculture for their living because they had neither. capital nor opportunity to embark upon a path of economic development characterized by economic diversity.


1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarjit Kaur

The present day economy of Sarawak is characterized by a small but rapidly growing, largely rural population engaged in low productivity, semi-subsistence agriculture; a dependence on the export of a few primary commodities; the relative absence of modern transportation linkages, and a small industrial sector. In many respects, therefore, Sarawak represents a microcosm of the underdeveloped world. Yet for about a hundred years Sarawak was ruled by the white Brooke dynasty and was touted as a true frontier for western expansion and an ideal setting for the exploitation of its natural resources. There was very little development during this period because Brooke rule was inimical to economic progress—the Brookes gave little or no financial assistance to the natives, undertook few developmental initiatives, and expected foreign entrepreneurs and missionaries to provide the rudiments of physical and social infrastructures. The Brookes believed that change, particularly far-reaching or rapid change, would be harmful to the natives. Consequently, when Brooke rule ended, the problems of economic development seemed more intractable while the supposed benefits of ‘white’ rule appeared less tangible.


1972 ◽  
Vol 82 (325) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
David Feldman ◽  
C. J. Wharton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document