Broadcast Regulation

2018 ◽  
pp. 243-271
Author(s):  
Dom Caristi ◽  
William R. Davie
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Justin Clemens ◽  
Christopher Dodds ◽  
Adam Nash

This chapter demonstrates how the introduction of large screens to contemporary public spaces function to assimilate diverse arts, commercial, and public forms into a conservative regime. On the one hand, the new opportunities that accompany the large public screens are subverted by the logic of capitalist accumulation, which informs a public address designed to achieve high volumes of individual engagement, rather than high quality public engagement. On the other hand, new opportunities to enhance public engagement are subjected to bureaucratic modes of governance, which pre-emptively censor content such that it extends and satisfies conservative regimes of early broadcast regulation. The authors argue that the confluence of capitalist and bureaucratic regimes governing big screens effectively balkanise audiences, valorise nondemocratic forms of participation, and privatise public spaces.


1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin G. Krasnow ◽  
Jill Abeshouse Stern
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Moss ◽  
Michael R. Fein

It is now more than forty years since Ronald Coase's seminal article on the Federal Communications Commission first appeared in the pages of the Journal of Law and Economics. The article remains important for a number of reasons, not least of which is that it offered his first articulation of the Coase Theorem. Of even greater importance for our purposes, the article literally redefined the terms of debate over American broadcast regulation, in both historical and contemporary treatments of the subject.


1961 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1023
Author(s):  
Richard S. Salant ◽  
Harvey J. Levin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document