broadcast regulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 09007
Author(s):  
Riris Tiani ◽  
M. Suryadi

This study aims to determine the effect of television shows on people's verbal behavior. Natnography used as a research method, to find out the types of television programs that are seen by many people of all ages. Cultural studies methods also used to determine the negative impact of television broadcast content. How the influence of television shows on the style of public communication in forming the character of millennial society. In-depth interview techniques with KPID and representatives of national television stations. Based on research in the field, television shows are present for 24 hours in the family room. Culture that accepted in society that television has not become a spectacle but has become a demand. Broadcasting institutions control the formation of mental, social, and cultural. The results of this study include many Impoliteness television shows. The reality in broadcasting shows that FTV content, talk shows, and advertisements have the most verbal abuse (VA) frequencies. Form (VA) is dominated by abuse, swear, invective, and (nonVA). 60% of the broadcasting composition in the media must be educative with local wisdom, 20% national or international public broadcasting, 20% broadcast advertising content. Forms of impertinence are influenced by frequency, television cognition, and broadcast regulation.


2018 ◽  
pp. 243-271
Author(s):  
Dom Caristi ◽  
William R. Davie
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Justin Clemens ◽  
Christopher Dodds ◽  
Adam Nash

This chapter demonstrates how the introduction of large screens to contemporary public spaces function to assimilate diverse arts, commercial, and public forms into a conservative regime. On the one hand, the new opportunities that accompany the large public screens are subverted by the logic of capitalist accumulation, which informs a public address designed to achieve high volumes of individual engagement, rather than high quality public engagement. On the other hand, new opportunities to enhance public engagement are subjected to bureaucratic modes of governance, which pre-emptively censor content such that it extends and satisfies conservative regimes of early broadcast regulation. The authors argue that the confluence of capitalist and bureaucratic regimes governing big screens effectively balkanise audiences, valorise nondemocratic forms of participation, and privatise public spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document