Neighbourhood accessibility and active travel

Author(s):  
Hugh Barton ◽  
Michael Horswell ◽  
Paul Millar
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon Lee White ◽  
Philip D. Parker ◽  
David R. Lubans ◽  
Freya MacMillan ◽  
Rebecca Olson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 102764
Author(s):  
Christian Brand ◽  
Evi Dons ◽  
Esther Anaya-Boig ◽  
Ione Avila-Palencia ◽  
Anna Clark ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Oguzhan Yilmaz ◽  
Matthew Frost ◽  
Andrew Timmis ◽  
Stephen Ison

Until recently, addressing the environmental externalities associated with the use of the private car and single occupancy vehicles has been the focus of the airport ground access policies worldwide. However, with the emerging unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, which have already changed the way we live, work, and travel, encouraging a change in commuter behavior has become even more important. This has necessitated that existing strategies be reconsidered in favor of adapting to a highly uncertain “COVID-19 world.” Historically, there has been a dearth of literature relating to airport employees’ ground access even though as a group employees represent an important segment of airport users with complex access requirements. This paper therefore focuses on airport employee related airport ground access strategies considering an emerging understanding of the future impacts of COVID-19 on global air travel. Pre-COVID strategies are investigated by conducting a documentary analysis of the most recent ground access strategies of 27 UK airports. The findings reveal that airport ground access strategies were mainly focused on setting targets and producing policy measures in favor of reducing car use and increasing the use of more sustainable transport modes including public transport, car sharing, and active travel (walking, cycling). However, measures encouraging public transport and car sharing will be more difficult to implement because of social distancing and fear of proximity to others. Instead, initiatives encouraging remote working, active travel, and improved staff awareness will be at the forefront of the future ground access strategy development.


Author(s):  
E Haynes ◽  
J Green ◽  
R Garside ◽  
MP Kelly ◽  
C Guell

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 741-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna E. Price ◽  
Delores M. Pluto ◽  
Olga Ogoussan ◽  
Jorge A. Banda

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Scott

This article explores how longer distance cycling can advance interspecies mobility justice, a theory of (im)mobilities and justice that includes other-than-human persons and habitats as worthy of our positive moral obligations. I argue that longer distance cycling can advance interspecies mobility justice by promoting socially inclusive and ecologically good cycling practices that redress the active travel poverty of marginalized and colonized populations, while replacing rather than augmenting auto roads with active travel routes that help humans respect other species. The article theorizes longer distance cycling not as some specific number of kilometres, but rather as the social production of cycling space across gentrified central cities, struggling inner suburbs, outer exurbs and rural countrysides. To explore this argument my analysis focuses on Canada, an extreme context for longer distance cycling. I offer a comparison of two case studies, situated on the country’s west and east coasts, Vancouver, British Columbia and Halifax, Nova Scotia, drawing on an ongoing ethnographic study of cycling practices and politics in Canada.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document