Evaluating probabilities for a football in-play betting market

2017 ◽  
pp. 52-70
Author(s):  
Stephen Dobson ◽  
John Goddard
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6594
Author(s):  
Yu-Chia Hsu

The interdisciplinary nature of sports and the presence of various systemic and non-systemic factors introduce challenges in predicting sports match outcomes using a single disciplinary approach. In contrast to previous studies that use sports performance metrics and statistical models, this study is the first to apply a deep learning approach in financial time series modeling to predict sports match outcomes. The proposed approach has two main components: a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier for implicit pattern recognition and a logistic regression model for match outcome judgment. First, the raw data used in the prediction are derived from the betting market odds and actual scores of each game, which are transformed into sports candlesticks. Second, CNN is used to classify the candlesticks time series on a graphical basis. To this end, the original 1D time series are encoded into 2D matrix images using Gramian angular field and are then fed into the CNN classifier. In this way, the winning probability of each matchup team can be derived based on historically implied behavioral patterns. Third, to further consider the differences between strong and weak teams, the CNN classifier adjusts the probability of winning the match by using the logistic regression model and then makes a final judgment regarding the match outcome. We empirically test this approach using 18,944 National Football League game data spanning 32 years and find that using the individual historical data of each team in the CNN classifier for pattern recognition is better than using the data of all teams. The CNN in conjunction with the logistic regression judgment model outperforms the CNN in conjunction with SVM, Naïve Bayes, Adaboost, J48, and random forest, and its accuracy surpasses that of betting market prediction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alistair Bruce ◽  
Anastasios Oikonomidis ◽  
Ming-Chien Sung ◽  
Johnnie E. V. Johnson

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Les Coleman

This paper quantifies the extent and changes in insider trading in the Melbourne racetrack betting market using a unique, long term dataset. Wagering markets share many of the characteristics of other financial markets, and are simple, with good data and a designated endpoint. Thus they are an excellent natural laboratory to study what is probably happening in qualitatively similar conventional markets. Results of this paper provide statistically significant support for hypotheses supporting the existence and increase in level of insider trading, and suggest that around two percent of betting is by insiders.Research for this paper was supported by a grant from the Economics and Commerce faculty at the University of Melbourne, and was conducted very efficiently by Andrew Saunderson. Dr Ian O’Connor provided excellent assistance with analysis of data. I am grateful for valuable comments from the Journal’s editor and an anonymous reviewer, and from delegates to the 2004 Australasian Finance and Banking Conference where an early version of this paper was presented. All remaining errors and omissions are mine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 101291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Elaad ◽  
J. James Reade ◽  
Carl Singleton

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 16-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Berkowitz ◽  
Craig A. Depken ◽  
John M. Gandar
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Hans Manner

AbstractThis paper treats the problem of modeling and forecasting the outcomes of NBA basketball games. First, it is shown how the benchmark model in the literature can be extended to allow for heteroscedasticity and estimation and testing in this framework is treated. Second, time-variation is introduced into the model by introducing a dynamic state space model for team strengths. The in-sample results based on eight seasons of NBA data provide weak evidence for heteroscedasticity, which can lead to notable differences in estimated win probabilities. However, persistent time variation is only found when combining the data of several seasons, but not when looking at individual seasons. The models are used for forecasting a large number of regular season and playoff games and the common finding in the literature that it is difficult to outperform the betting market is confirmed. Nevertheless, a forecast combination of model based forecasts with betting odds can lead to some slight improvements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document