scholarly journals Primary Care Physician Designation and Response to Clinical Decision Support Reminders

2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 248-259
Author(s):  
Paul Gorman ◽  
Jeffrey Weinfeld
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Preventive Care ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Health Record

SummaryClinical decision support (CDS) has been shown to improve process outcomes, but overalerting may not produce incremental benefits. We analyzed providers’ response to preventive care reminders to determine if reminder response rates varied when a primary care provider (PCP) saw their own patients as compared with a partner’s patients. Secondary objectives were to describe variation in PCP identification in the electronic health record (EHR) across sites, and to determine its accuracy.We retrospectively analyzed response to preventive care reminders during visits to outpatient primary care sites over a three-month period where an EHR was used. Data on clinician requests for reminders, viewing of preventive care reminders, and response rates were stratified by whether the patient visited their own PCP, the PCP’s partner, or where no PCP was listed in the EHR. We calculated the proportion of PCP identification across sites and agreement of identified PCP with an external standard.Of 84,937 visits, 58,482 (68.9%) were with the PCP, 10,259 (12.1%) were with the PCP’s partner, and 16,196 (19.1%) had no listed PCP. Compared with PCP partner visits, visits with the patient’s PCP were associated with more requested reminders (30.9% vs 22.9%), viewed reminders (29.7% vs 20.7%), and responses to reminders (28.7% vs 12.6%), all comparisons p<0.001. Visits with no listed PCP had the lowest rates of requests, views, and responses. There was good agreement between the EHR-listed PCP and the provider seen for a plurality of visits over the last year (D = 0.917).A PCP relationship during a visit was associated with higher use of preventive care reminders and a lack of PCP was associated with lower use of CDS. Targeting reminders to the PCP may be desirable, but further studies are needed to determine which strategy achieves better patient care outcomes.primary care physician (PCP), clinical decision support (CDS), electronic health record (EHR), National Provider Identifier (NPI)

scholarly journals Dissemination of child abuse clinical decision support: Moving beyond a single electronic health record

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 104349
Author(s):  
Thomas McGinn ◽  
David A. Feldstein ◽  
Isabel Barata ◽  
Emily Heineman ◽  
Joshua Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Abuse ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Reduced Length of Stay Using Clinical Decision Support Tool (ASAP) for Empiric Antibiotic Selection

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s368-s368
Author(s):  
Mary Acree ◽  
Kamaljit Singh ◽  
Urmila Ravichandran ◽  
Jennifer Grant ◽  
Gary Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Antibiotic Selection ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic

Background: Empiric antibiotic selection is challenging and requires knowledge of the local antibiogram, national guidelines and patient-specific factors, such as drug allergy and recent antibiotic exposure. Clinical decision support for empiric antibiotic selection has the potential to improve adherence to guidelines and improve patient outcomes. Methods: At NorthShore University HealthSystem, a 4-hospital, 789 bed system, an automated point-of-care decision support tool referred to as Antimicrobial Stewardship Assistance Program (ASAP) was created for empiric antibiotic selection for 4 infectious syndromes: pneumonia, skin and soft-tissue infections, urinary tract infection, and intra-abdominal infection. The tool input data from the electronic health record, which can be modified by any user. Using an algorithm created with electronic health record data, antibiogram data, and national guidelines, the tool produces an antibiotic recommendation that can be ordered via a link to order entry. If the tool identifies a patient with a high likelihood for a multidrug-resistant infection, a consultation by an infectious diseases specialist is recommended. Utilization of the tool and associated outcomes were evaluated from July 2018 to May 2019. Results: The ASAP tool was executed by 140 unique, noninfectious diseases providers 790 times. The tool was utilized most often for pneumonia (194 tool uses), followed by urinary tract infection (166 tool uses). The most common provider type to use the tool was an internal medicine hospitalist. The tool increased adherence to the recommended antibiotic regimen for each condition. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed by an infectious diseases physician. Antibiotics were considered appropriate when they were similar to the antibiotic regimen recommended by the ASAP. Inappropriate antibiotics were classified as broad or narrow. When antibiotic coverage was appropriate, hospital length of stay was statistically significantly shorter (4.8 days vs 6.8 days for broad antibiotics vs 7.4 days for narrow antibiotics; P < .01). No significant differences were identified in mortality or readmission. Conclusions: A clinical decision support tool in the electronic health record can improve adherence to recommended empiric antibiotic therapy. Use of appropriate antibiotics recommended by such a tool can reduce hospital length of stay.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Developing Clinical Decision Support within a Commercial Electronic Health Record System to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Neonatal ICU

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 368-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Cato ◽  
B. Sheehan ◽  
S. Patel ◽  
J. Duchon ◽  
P. DeLaMora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Electronic Health Record System ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Record System ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Neonatal Icu ◽  
Electronic Health

SummaryObjective: To develop and implement a clinical decision support (CDS) tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to evaluate user acceptance of the CDS tool.Methods: Following sociotechnical analysis of NICU prescribing processes, a CDS tool for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) was developed and incorporated into a commercial electronic health record (EHR) in two NICUs. User logs were reviewed and NICU prescribers were surveyed for their perceptions of the CDS tool.Results: The CDS tool aggregated selected laboratory results, including culture results, to make treatment recommendations for common clinical scenarios. From July 2010 to May 2012, 1,303 CDS activations for 452 patients occurred representing 22% of patients prescribed antibiotics during this period. While NICU clinicians viewed two culture results per tool activation, prescribing recommendations were viewed during only 15% of activations. Most (63%) survey respondents were aware of the CDS tool, but fewer (37%) used it during their most recent NICU rotation. Respondents considered the most useful features to be summarized culture results (43%) and antibiotic recommendations (48%).Discussion: During the study period, the CDS tool functionality was hindered by EHR upgrades, implementation of a new laboratory information system, and changes to antimicrobial testing methodologies. Loss of functionality may have reduced viewing antibiotic recommendations. In contrast, viewing culture results was frequently performed, likely because this feature was perceived as useful and functionality was preserved.Conclusion: To improve CDS tool visibility and usefulness, we recommend early user and information technology team involvement which would facilitate use and mitigate implementation challenges.Citation: Hum RS, Cato K, Sheehan B, Patel S, Duchon J, DeLaMora P, Ferng YH, Graham P, Vawdrey DK, Perlman J, Larson E, Saiman L. Developing clinical decision support within a commercial electronic health record system to improve antimicrobial prescribing in the neonatal ICU. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 368–387 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0069

scholarly journals Integrating pharmacogenetic information and clinical decision support into the electronic health record

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry R Goldspiel ◽  
Willy A Flegel ◽  
Gary DiPatrizio ◽  
Tristan Sissung ◽  
Sharon D Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Wright ◽  
Angela Ai ◽  
Joan Ash ◽  
Jane F Wiesen ◽  
Thu-Trang T Hickman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Medical Informatics ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative Methods ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Objective To develop an empirically derived taxonomy of clinical decision support (CDS) alert malfunctions. Materials and Methods We identified CDS alert malfunctions using a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods: (1) site visits with interviews of chief medical informatics officers, CDS developers, clinical leaders, and CDS end users; (2) surveys of chief medical informatics officers; (3) analysis of CDS firing rates; and (4) analysis of CDS overrides. We used a multi-round, manual, iterative card sort to develop a multi-axial, empirically derived taxonomy of CDS malfunctions. Results We analyzed 68 CDS alert malfunction cases from 14 sites across the United States with diverse electronic health record systems. Four primary axes emerged: the cause of the malfunction, its mode of discovery, when it began, and how it affected rule firing. Build errors, conceptualization errors, and the introduction of new concepts or terms were the most frequent causes. User reports were the predominant mode of discovery. Many malfunctions within our database caused rules to fire for patients for whom they should not have (false positives), but the reverse (false negatives) was also common. Discussion Across organizations and electronic health record systems, similar malfunction patterns recurred. Challenges included updates to code sets and values, software issues at the time of system upgrades, difficulties with migration of CDS content between computing environments, and the challenge of correctly conceptualizing and building CDS. Conclusion CDS alert malfunctions are frequent. The empirically derived taxonomy formalizes the common recurring issues that cause these malfunctions, helping CDS developers anticipate and prevent CDS malfunctions before they occur or detect and resolve them expediently.

Building an information system to facilitate pharmacogenomics clinical translation with clinical decision support

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weifeng Qin ◽  
Xudong Lu ◽  
Qiang Shu ◽  
Huilong Duan ◽  
Haomin Li
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Clinical Translation ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Novel Approach

Pharmacogenomics clinical decision support (PGx-CDS) is an important tool to incorporate PGx information into existing clinical workflows and facilitate PGx clinical translation. However, due to the lack of a computable formalization to represent the primary PGx knowledge, the complexity of genomics information and the lag of current commercial electronic health record (EHR) system for precision medicine, it is difficult to develop computerized PGx-CDS. Therefore, we explored a novel approach to build an information system, named the Pharmacogenomics Clinical Translation Platform (PCTP), for PGx clinical implementation. The PCTP can represent, store, and manage the primary PGx knowledge in a structured and computable format. Moreover, it has the potential to provide various PGx-CDS services and simplify the integration of PGx-CDS into EHRs.

scholarly journals Electronic health record-based clinical decision support alert for severe sepsis: a randomised evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 762-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Lance Downing ◽  
Joshua Rolnick ◽  
Sarah F Poole ◽  
Evan Hall ◽  
Alexander J Wessels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Electronic Health

BackgroundSepsis remains the top cause of morbidity and mortality of hospitalised patients despite concerted efforts. Clinical decision support for sepsis has shown mixed results reflecting heterogeneous populations, methodologies and interventions.ObjectivesTo determine whether the addition of a real-time electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support alert improves adherence to treatment guidelines and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with suspected severe sepsis.DesignPatient-level randomisation, single blinded.SettingMedical and surgical inpatient units of an academic, tertiary care medical centre.Patients1123 adults over the age of 18 admitted to inpatient wards (intensive care units (ICU) excluded) at an academic teaching hospital between November 2014 and March 2015.InterventionsPatients were randomised to either usual care or the addition of an EHR-generated alert in response to a set of modified severe sepsis criteria that included vital signs, laboratory values and physician orders.Measurements and main resultsThere was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in primary outcome of the percentage of patients with new antibiotic orders at 3 hours after the alert (35% vs 37%, p=0.53). There was no difference in secondary outcomes of in-hospital mortality at 30 days, length of stay greater than 72 hours, rate of transfer to ICU within 48 hours of alert, or proportion of patients receiving at least 30 mL/kg of intravenous fluids.ConclusionsAn EHR-based severe sepsis alert did not result in a statistically significant improvement in several sepsis treatment performance measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document