scholarly journals CAD/CAM Milling versus Rapid Prototyping Surgical Guide Techniques in Dental Implant Placement

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Adham Omar Elghamry ◽  
Marwa Ezzat Sabet ◽  
Fardos Nabil Rizk ◽  
Hebatallah Tarek Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Prototyping ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Cad Cam

Evaluation of the accuracy of a novel surgical guide for flapless dental implant placement for immediate loading in edentulous jaws

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni de Almeida Prado Di Giacomo ◽  
Patrícia Cury ◽  
Airton Moreira da Silva ◽  
Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pompeo Souto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Selective Laser Sintering ◽  
Apical Region ◽  
Virtual Planning ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Surgical Guides ◽  
Edentulous Jaws ◽  
Edentulous Jaw

This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel computer-designed and selectively laser sintered surgical guide for flapless dental implant placement in the edentulous jaw. Fifty dental implants were placed in 11 patients with at least one totally edentulous jaw. Initially, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed in each patient to define the virtual position of the dental implants based on the assessment of bone availability and the proposed dental prosthesis. After virtual planning, 3D surgical guides were printed using selective laser sintering. CBCT was repeated after the surgery, and the pre-and postoperative images were overlapped in the CAD software to compare the planned and actual positions of the dental implants using a one-sample t-test. The mean ± angular standard deviation between the long axes of the planned and final dental implant positions was 4.58 ±2.85 degrees; The linear deviation in the coronal position was  0.87 ± 0.49 mm and  in the apical region of the dental implants was 1.37 ± 0.69 mm. These differences were statistically significant (p <0.001). The proposed modifications reduced the deviations, resulting in an improvement in the technique. We were able to place implants and temporary prostheses using the present protocol, taking into account the differences between the planned and final positions of the dental implants.

A surgical guide for dental implant placement in an edentulous jaw

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Y.P. Wat ◽  
Edmond H.N. Pow ◽  
Francis S.W. Chau ◽  
Katherine C.M. Leung
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Edentulous Jaw

scholarly journals Evaluating the Accuracy of Tooth-supported VS Mucosa-supported 3D-printed Surgical Guide in dental implant placement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad TOUTANGY ◽  
Bassel BRAD ◽  
Mohammad Alaa ALZEİN ◽  
Mohammed Yamen AL-SHURBAJİ AL-MOZİEK
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
3D Printed

scholarly journals Surgical guide techniques and treatment planning for dental implant placement

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Yunus Ahmed ◽  
Jeevan Shetty ◽  
K Mahima Shetty ◽  
Mudakanna Paiddoddi ◽  
Shahid Afrid Ahamed
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement

Simplistic Partially Limiting Surgical Guide for Flapless Implant Placement: A Case Report

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Nanda ◽  
Veen Jain
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Diagnostic Information ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Implant Abutment ◽  
Provisional Restoration ◽  
Dental Implant Abutment

The accurate positioning of implant in bone is important in order to meet the biological, esthetic, and biomechanical requirements of the prosthesis. This becomes crucial in flapless implant placement. The combination of bone sounding and use of a surgical guide will allow precise placement of a dental implant, abutment, and provisional restoration in a minimally invasive manner. A technique to transfer the diagnostic information to the surgical guide is described in this report. The chief advantage of the procedure is the ability to apply flapless implant placement surgery and immediate loading.

scholarly journals Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wu ◽  
Lin Zhou ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Bao Zhang ◽  
Yanjun Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Influence Factors ◽  
Angular Deviation ◽  
Experience Level ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Dynamic Navigation

Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation (DN) with a static surgical guide (SSG) for dental implant placement and the influence factors such as the experience of the surgeon and the implant sites. Methods and materials A total of 38 implants, which underwent the dynamic navigation, and 57 implants which underwent a static surgical guide were enrolled in the retrospective study. Coronal deviation, apical deviation, and angular deviation were compared between the DN and SSG groups, along with the different experience level of surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and SSG groups, and the experience level of the surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. However, the apical deviation of the DN was slightly higher than the SSG group in the anterior teeth (P = 0.028), and the angular deviation of DN was smaller than the SSG group in the molar. Conclusion Dynamic navigation can achieve accurate implant placement as well as the static surgical guide. Additionally, the experience level of the surgeon and implant site do not influence the accuracy of dynamic navigation, while the accuracy of DN seems higher than the SSG in molar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document