scholarly journals DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATIONS IN VIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS RECOMMENDATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Takako Kojima
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Biomedical Research ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Scholarly Publishing ◽  
Global Awareness ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Biomedical Publications

As potential conflicts of interest (COI) are common in biomedical research, handling related issues and managing disclosures is increasingly important. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) revised its guidance on COI in 2019 and introduced the latest version of the COI Disclosure Form in 2021. These documents provide guidance regarding COI policy for ICMJE member and non-member journals. The 2019 revision overviews the main changes in the ICMJE policy. The ICMJE prioritizes appropriate COI disclosures by authors and all others involved in scholarly publishing. Increasing the global awareness of the COI updated policies among all stakeholders is essential for strengthening ethical standing of journals.

scholarly journals Data sharing: a new editorial initiative of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Implications for the Editors’ Network

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fernando Alfonso ◽  
Karlen Adamyan ◽  
Jean-Yves Artigou ◽  
Michael Aschermann ◽  
Michael Boehm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Technical Requirements ◽  
Biomedical Journals ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

Summary The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) provides recommendations to improve the editorial standards and scientific quality of biomedical journals. These recommendations range from uniform technical requirements to more complex and elusive editorial issues including ethical aspects of the scientific process. Recently, registration of clinical trials, conflicts of interest disclosure, and new criteria for authorship, emphasizing the importance of responsibility and accountability, have been proposed. Last year, a new editorial initiative to foster sharing of clinical trial data was launched. This review discusses this novel initiative with the aim of increasing awareness among readers, investigators, authors and editors belonging to the Editors’ Network of the European Society of Cardiology.

Withholding conflicts of interest: the many flaws of the new ICMJE disclosure form

2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106136
Author(s):  
David Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
New Form ◽  
The Many

In this article, I describe and analyse the proposed new International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosing conflicts of interest and conclude that it has many flaws. The form does not mention ‘conflicts of interest’ even once in either its body or its title, it introduces a conceptually confused categorisation of different potential conflicts and it ignores future conflicts and intellectual biases. Finally, many of the authors of the new form have themselves failed to declare relevant potential conflicts of interest.

Issues and Best Practices Related to Ethical Writing and Publishing

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia R. King
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Financial Misconduct ◽  
Redundant Publication

Abstract For decades there have been several common ethical issues in writing and publishing that have plagued nurse authors and editors. These have included authorship, duplicate or redundant publication, conflicts of interest (including financial), misconduct, and peer review. These topics have been discussed independently and together, but it has not been until recently that appropriate guidelines or best practices have emerged. Nursing and other scientific journals have struggled with these issues continuously and now organizations (e.g., International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and Office of Integrity) have developed guidelines and best practices to help authors and editors.

scholarly journals Editorial-Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W De Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Declaraciones del Comité Internacional de Directores de Revistas Médicas anexas a las normas de Vancouver

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
International Committee Of Medical Journal Editors
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Popular Media ◽  
Conflicts Of Interests ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Biomedical Journals ◽  
Dissemination Of Research ◽  
Definition Of

These statements, which are published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in conjunction with the Vancouver standards, cover sorne of the legal, ethical, and practical aspects of the publication of research papers, and of the comments generated by them, in biomedical journals. Pollowing a definition of what constitutes a peer-reviewed journal, the roles of journal owners and editors are described, along with those of members of an editorial board, and procedural norms are set forth in connection with conflicts of interests, retractions or corrections, fraud, and breaches of confidentiality. Arnong the last topics explored are the problems involved in the dissemination of research results by the popular media, the handling of advertising within the journal, and the simultaneous acceptance of manuscripts whose authors have arrived at opposite conclusions regarding the results of a particular study.

scholarly journals ¿Qué hacer cuando un lector sospecha de una falta ética?

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Alfredo Oyola-García
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Journal Editors

La mayoría, o casi todas, las publicaciones científicas siguen las recomendaciones del International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Este comité señala claramente que la publicación duplicada es una mala conducta científica(1,2), pero también lo puede ser la difamación pública, como lo hemos señalado en otros artículos.

Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 387 (10016) ◽  
pp. e9-e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document