ISW for the Treatment of Adult Skeletal Class II Case with Temporary Anchorage Device

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Huang Chun-Yi ◽  
◽  
Yu Jian-Hong ◽  
Lin Chih-Chieh ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Anterior Crowding ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Mandibular Plane ◽  
Temporary Anchorage Device

Patients with a Class II malocclusion, proclination, severe crowding of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth, and high mandibular plane angles are a treatment-planning challenge. This case report describes an orthodontic treatment and maxillary premolar extraction without orthognathic surgery for a 18-year old man. Maximum anchorage is needed for upper anterior retraction by using Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD’s). The use of IME and ISW unilateral MEAW was important to relieve upper and lower anterior crowding. After treatment, the patient had a better profile, adequate overjet and overbite. This case report demonstrates that a minimally invasive treatment can successfully correct a severe skeletal Class II malocclusion with large overjet.

scholarly journals TADs assisted Camouflage Orthodontic Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion in a Non Growing Patient: A case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Trilok Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Maxillary Incisor ◽  
Mandibular Incisor ◽  
Anterior Crowding ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Curve Of Spee ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Class II, Division I malocclusion has been described as the most frequent treatment problem in orthodontic practice. Aim & objectives of the present case report was to evaluate the management of skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion in non growing patient with extraction of upper first premolars. Clinical and cephalometric evaluation revealed skeletal Class II with Angles Class II division 1 malocclusion with mild mandibular anterior crowding and increased overjet, severe maxillary incisor proclination, mild mandibular crowding, exaggerated curve of spee, convex profile, incompetent lips, increased overjet and overbite. Maxillary first premolars were extracted followed by en-masse retraction of anteriors with the help of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to avoid anchorage loss. Mandibular incisor was extracted to correct curve of spee. Following treatment marked improvement in patient’s smile, facial profile and lip competence were achieved and there was a remarkable increase in the patient’s confidence and quality of life.

scholarly journals Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment of Class II Malocclusion in Non-growing Patient - A Case Report

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lubna Khan ◽  
Hemant Kumar Halwai ◽  
Rajiv Yadav ◽  
Ourvind Jeet Singh Birring
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

The prevalence of skeletal Class II malocclusion is high amongst Asian population. Various treatment modalities have been presented for the treatment of Class II malocclusions in adult patients. We come across many adult patients who desire a costeffective and non-surgical correction and they accept dental camouflage as a treatment option to mask skeletal discrepancy. This case report presents a 26-year-old non-growing female who had a skeletal Class II malocclusion with prognathic maxilla and retrognathic mandible with an overjet of 7 mm, severe crowding, but did not want surgical treatment. We considered the camouflage treatment by extracting upper first premolars. Following the treatment, a satisfactory result was achieved with an acceptable static and functional occlusion, facial profile, smile and lip competence with patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Gummy smile and facial profile correction using miniscrew anchorage

2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Kaku ◽  
Shunichi Kojima ◽  
Hiromi Sumi ◽  
Hiroyuki Koseki ◽  
Sara Abedini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surgical Therapy ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Retention Period ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Profile Correction ◽  
Gummy Smile

Abstract This case report describes the treatment of a case involving a skeletal Class II facial profile with a gummy smile. While treating a facial profile and a gummy smile, the outcome may not always be successful with orthodontic therapy alone. For this reason, surgical therapy is often chosen to gain an esthetic facial profile and a good smile. However, sometimes the patients reject surgical treatment and an alternative method must be considered. Skeletal anchorage systems such as miniscrews are now frequently used for correcting severe malocclusion that should be treated by surgical therapy. In this case report, we treated a skeletal Class II malocclusion with a convex profile and a gummy smile using miniscrews, which were placed in the upper posterior and anterior areas. The active treatment period was 3.5 years, and the patient's teeth continued to be stable after a retention period of 36 months.

scholarly journals Successful orthodontic treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a non growing patient : A case report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
MW Ali ◽  
MZ Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Maxillary Incisor ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Canine Retraction ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Aim & objectives of the present case report was to evaluate the management of skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion in non growing patient with extraction of upper first premolars. Clinical and cephalometric evaluation revealed skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion with severe maxillary incisor proclination, convex profile, average mandibular plane angle, incompetent lips, increased overjet and overbite. After extraction of upper 1st premolars, canine retraction was done which was followed by retraction of severely proclined upper anterior teeth by judicious control of third order bend in rectangular stainless steel arch wire with “V” loop . For anchorage management, intra oral anchorage with tip back & toe in bends in stainless steel arch wire was satisfactory. Following treatment marked improvement in patient’s smile, facial profile and lip competence were achieved and there was a remarkable increase in the patient’s confidence and quality of life. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v2i2.16165 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2012; Vol-2, No.2, 41-45

scholarly journals Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Treatment with Combined Twin Block and Lip Bumper Appliances: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (Supp. 1) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Hilda Fitria Lubis ◽  
Nurhayati Harahap ◽  
Ananda Permata Sari
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Condylar Cartilage ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Mandibular Growth ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Lip Bumper

Functional appliances have been used over a century in clinical orthodontic treatments for skeletal Class II malocclusion patients. Its popularity is attributed to its high patient adaptability and ability to produce rapid treatment changes. The twin block and lip bumper can be combined depending on the patient’s cases. The purpose of therapy with twin block is effective in mandibular growth deficiencies to induce supplementary lengthening of mandibular by stimulating increased growth at the condylar cartilage. The patient was a ten-year-old male patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. He had a convex facial profile, SNA (sella, nasion, A point) angle of 77.5°, SNB (sella, nasion, B point) angle of 73.0°, ANB (A point, nasion, B point) angle of 4.5°, overjet of 6.5 mm, overbite of 11/41 = 5.0 mm, 21/31 = 4.5 mm, abnormal upper labial frenulum, crossbite in the second left premolar of maxilla, crowded anterior teeth of mandibular, deficiency of mandibular growth, lower lip sucking habit, anterior teeth of maxilla with diastema and proclination. Orthodontic treatment for patient is a combination of twin block and lip bumper appliances. After seven months, frenectomy is used to eliminate and correct the spacing in the frenulum. After 10 months, the patient’s skeletal and profile had improved to skeletal Class I malocclusion, SNA angle of 78.0°, SNB angle of 75.0°, ANB angle of 3.0°, overbite and overjet of 4.0 mm, and the lower lip sucking habit had stopped. Twin block and lip bumper appliances are particularly good alternative treatment in managing selected cases of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

scholarly journals Management of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Non-Complaint Patient using Powerscope - A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Akram Ansari ◽  
Abhay Kumar Jain ◽  
Ankit Singh ◽  
Priya Sharma ◽  
Muneeb Adil
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Adolescent Male ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

Class II malocclusion in pubertal phase presents a major and a common challenge to orthodontists. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning in early stage help in preventing and intercepting the severity of malocclusion. In pubertal phase skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion are best treated with functional appliance. In recent time PowerScope fixed functional appliance is gaining immense popularity as noncompliant Class II corrector. In the present case report an adolescent male patient having Class II division 1 malocclusion with functional jaw retrusion was treated using MBT 0.022” prescription and PowerScope appliance. 7-8 months of PowerScope wear obtained stable and successful results with improvement in facial profile, skeletal jaw relationship and mild increase in IMPA. It can thus be concluded that PowerScope gives good results in Class II correction with a combination of patient comfort and ease of use that was unmatched among other appliances

scholarly journals Maxillomandibular Transverse Osteodistraction: A Multidisciplinary Case Report with 30-Month Follow-Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
G. Turatti ◽  
A. Bruni ◽  
M. Savoini ◽  
M. Giordano ◽  
G. Gerbino
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Crowding ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Smile Aesthetics ◽  
Dental Crowding ◽  
Jaw Surgery

Aim. To describe a multidisciplinary treatment to correct a severe II class malocclusion with reduced both maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and dental crowding. Case Report. A 17-year-old young woman presented with an increased overjet complaining chiefly of forwardly placed upper front teeth and unpleasant smile aesthetics. The patient facially exhibited a gently convex profile, severe mentalis strain on lip closure, and dark buccal corridors. The intraoral assessment indicates Class II molar relationship bilaterally, mandibular and maxillary anterior crowding, and narrow shape of upper and lower arches. The cephalometric evaluation of the lateral radiograph of the skull evidences a skeletal Class II with a reduction of lower face height. Based upon the diagnostic records and consultation with the patient, surgically assisted expansion of both arches using bone-borne distractors, comprehensive orthodontic treatment, and combined jaw surgery was planned. Results. This approach permitted achieving most of the desired objectives in approximately 30 months. The follow-up records 30 months after treatment conclusion showed a stable occlusion. No complications were clinically and radiographically noticeable during the follow-up.

scholarly journals Mini-implant Supported Lip Bumper

2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422110221
Author(s):  
Aravinthrajkumar Govindaraj ◽  
Ashwin Mathew George
Keyword(s):  
Normal Growth ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Mini Implants ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Lip Bumper

Patients with a skeletal class II malocclusion are usually associated with a prognathic maxilla with orthognathic mandible or a retrognathic mandible with orthognathic maxilla or a combination of both. Patients with severe prognathic maxilla are usually associated with increased overjet which results in a lower lip trap. The lip trap should be managed the earliest as it will lead to further proclination of the upper anterior teeth and also hinder the normal growth of the mandible. To overcome the limitations of a conventional lip bumper, we arrived at an idea of fixed lip bumper supported using mini-implants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document