Flower constancy in Diptera visiting two close species of goldenrod (Solidago gigantea and S. canadensis): can flies distinguish between morphologically similar plants?

Author(s):  
E.N. Ustinova ◽  
S.N. Lysenkov
2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Bochenek ◽  
Agnieszka Synowiec ◽  
Bożena Kondrat ◽  
Milena Szymczak ◽  
Lesław B. Lahuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 971-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Vallino ◽  
Nadia Massa ◽  
Erica Lumini ◽  
Valeria Bianciotto ◽  
Graziella Berta ◽  
...  

1950 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 379-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verne Grant
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Pat Willmer

This chapter examines pollination syndromes, floral constancy, and pollinator effectiveness. Flowers show enormous adaptive radiation, but the same kind of flower reappears by convergent evolution in many different families. Thus many families produce rather similar, simple bowl-shaped flowers like buttercups; many produce similar zygomorphic tubular lipped flowers; and many produce fluffy flower heads of massed (often white) florets. These broad flower types are the basis of the idea of pollination syndromes—the flowers have converged on certain morphologies and reward patterns because they are exploiting the abilities and preferences of particular kinds of visitor. After providing an overview of pollination syndromes, the chapter explains why pollination syndromes can be defended. It then considers flower constancy, along with the distinction between flower visitors and effective pollinators. It concludes with some observations on how flower visitors can contribute to speciation of plants through specialization and through their constancy.


Apidologie ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Konzmann ◽  
Margareta Kluth ◽  
Deniz Karadana ◽  
Klaus Lunau

AbstractHeriades truncorum (Megachilidae) is a specialist bee that forages on Asteraceae and collects pollen by tapping its abdomen on pollen-presenting florets which places the grains directly in the ventral scopa. We tracked pollen transfer by female H. truncorum between conspecific inflorescences of Inula ensifolia and Pulicaria dysenterica by labelling pollen with quantum dots. On average, bees transferred 31.14 (I. ensifolia) and 9.96 (P. dysenterica) pollen grains from the last visited inflorescence, 39% and 45% of which were placed on receptive styles. Pollen germination ratio is significantly lower for inflorescences of P. dysenterica visited by one H. truncorum (0.13%) compared with open control inflorescences (0.51%), which suggests that the bees mainly transfer self-pollen of these self-incompatible plants. Thus, a single visit by H. truncorum does not grant the plant high reproductive success, but the bees’ abundance and flower constancy might reduce this disadvantage.


2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Lendl
Keyword(s):  

Ethology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 793-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Gegear ◽  
James D. Thomson
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Midori Kobayashi-Kidokoro ◽  
Seigo Higashi

The food habits of the solitary beeCeratina flavipeswere studied by observation on foraging behavior and identifying the pollen grains that they collected. It appeared thatC. flavipestend to collect pollen from particular species; however, they visit multiple flowering species. We analyzed pollen sources from pollen loads of dried specimens from single foraging trips (SFT) and in pollen balls created from a single foraging day (SD). The pollen from all pollen balls in a nest represented the harvest from an entire breeding season (BP). This analysis showed that each bee on average collected pollen from 3.24 (SFTs), 2.02 (SD), and 3.12 (BP) flowering species. Bees collected pollen from a total of 14 flowering plant species. Furthermore, we calculated when pollen balls were created and found no significant interaction between seasonal pollen availability and bee preferences. Moreover, bees had consistent flower preferences, even if the preferred flower was not dominant at all times. These results indicate thatC. flavipesexhibits flower constancy, and therefore, the generalist pollinatorC. flavipescould function like a specialist pollinator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document