This chapter concludes Volume III of Studies in the Contract Laws of Asia. It summarizes the main findings on the 13 Asian jurisdictions covered (China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam). With regard to both the interpretation of contracts and the control of unfair terms, the various legal sources and their ‘Western’ sources of inspiration are described, questions of classification and terminology discussed, and the major substantive issues that arise across legal systems examined. The latter include the dichotomy of ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ approaches to contractual interpretation; the admissible aids to interpretation, such as customs, usages, the commercial background, good faith, and the negotiations of the parties; the conflict between ‘literalist’ and ‘contextualist’ approaches, particularly with regard to gap-filling by way of implication of terms or ‘supplementary interpretation’; the ‘covert’ judicial control of unfair terms under general contract law doctrines, such as incorporation, interpretation, and the rules on procedural unfairness; the open control based on specific legislation on either particular types of term, unfair standard terms, or consumer contracts, and the supporting enforcement mechanisms. In conclusion, the chapter highlights the differences and similarities that can be observed across Asia, relates these to the wide variety of legal transfers that occurred in the relevant legal systems, and maps out issues for further research.