Comparação entre colpofixação ao ligamento sacroespinhal com uso de tela anterior transobturatória e colpopromontofixação para correção de prolapso genital apical = Comparasion of sacrospinous ligament supension with transobturator mesh and sacral colpopexy in genital prolapse

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maíra Furtado Greco Mazzer
Keyword(s):  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Transobturator Mesh

scholarly journals Sacrospinous ligament suspension with transobturator mesh versus sacral colpopexy for genital prolapse

Clinics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 487-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
CR Juliato ◽  
MF Mazzer ◽  
JM Diniz ◽  
CH Farias ◽  
EB Castro
Keyword(s):  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension ◽  
Transobturator Mesh

scholarly journals MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF UROGENITAL PROLAPSE USING AMI I-STITCH

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-146
Author(s):  
Adrian Hasegan ◽  
◽  
Nicolae Grigore ◽  
Valentin Pirvut ◽  
Ionela Mihai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Static Disorder ◽  
Urogenital Prolapse ◽  
Over 40 Years ◽  
Urology Clinic

Introduction. Genital prolapse is a pelvic static disorder, which represents the descending of the vaginal walls and the uterus in the vaginal axis with their exteriorization through vaginal introit. It is a public health problem, with a risk of occurrence of 30-40% in women over 40 years old, of 20-30% in multiparous, of about 20% after surgeries, having as the main cause injuries to pelvic supporting and suspension structures. The objective of this paper is to compare the classic transvaginal surgical technique of mounting the prosthesis to the bilateral sacrospinous ligament with the technique of fixing the mesh to the sacrospinous ligament using the I-Stitch device. Materials and methods. Between 2010 and 2017, in the Sibiu Urology Clinic, there were diagnosed 57 patients (p) with urogenital prolapse who benefited from colpopexy by fixing the polypropylene mesh to the sacrospinous ligament using the I-Stitch device and colpopexy by classically fixing the mesh. Results. In the group using the I-Stich device, mean operative time was 48.5 minutes (between 35 and 110 minutes), mean blood loss was 140 ml (90-300 ml), postoperative pain present in 5 p (8.77%), hospitalization length between 2 and 5 days with an average of 3.2 days. Conclusion. Reconstructive surgery of pelvic floor is a combination of surgical procedures designed to correct multiple defects, is definitive and curative in the treatment of prolapse.

Functional results and quality-of-life after bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for genital prolapse

2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel David-Montefiore ◽  
Emmanuel Barranger ◽  
Gil Dubernard ◽  
Victor Nizard ◽  
Jean-Marie Antoine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document