Effect of Laparoscopic Combined Repair on Uterine Incision Diverticulum after Cesarean Section

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Biyik ◽  
Fatih Keskin ◽  
Elif Keskin

AbstractPlacenta accreta syndromes are associated with increased maternal mortality and morbidity. Cesarean hysterectomy is usually performed in cases of placenta accreta syndrome. Fertility sparing methods can be applied. In the present study, we report a successful segmental uterine resection method for placenta accreta in the anterior uterine wall in a cesarean section case. A 39-year-old woman underwent an elective cesarean section at 38 + 2 weeks. A placental tissue with an area of 10 cm was observed extending from the anterior uterine wall to the serosa, 2 cm above the uterine incision line. The placental tissue was removed with the help of monopolar electrocautery. The uterine incision was continuously sutured. The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. The placental pathology was reported as placenta accreta. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) generally recommends cesarean section hysterectomy in cases of placenta accreta because removal of placenta associated with significant hemorrhage. Conservative and fertility sparing methods include placenta left in situ, cervical inversion technique and triple-P procedure. There are several studies reporting that segmental uterine resection is performed with and without balloon placement or artery ligation. Segmental uterine resection may be an alternative to cesarean hysterectomy to preserve fertility or to protect the uterus in cases of placenta accreta when there is no placenta previa.


F1000Research ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner M Neuhausser ◽  
Laxmi V Baxi

We present here a case of vasa previa in a multipara, diagnosed at the time of her late second trimester ultrasonogram. The patient subsequently underwent an elective cesarean section after 37 weeks gestation, giving birth to a healthy child with an uneventful post-partum, neonatal and infant course. At the time of cesarean section, the incision was gradually deepened in layers through the myometrium by utmost care allowing the amniotic sac to protrude through the uterine incision hereby avoiding laceration of the vasa previa and its branches. Fetal exsanguination and a need for blood transfusion as well as a possible adverse neonatal course were therefore avoided.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Turan ◽  
Esra Esim Büyükbayrak ◽  
Aylin Onan Yilmaz ◽  
Yasemin Karageyim Karsidag ◽  
Meltem Pirimoglu

1994 ◽  
Vol 171 (4) ◽  
pp. 1022-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo I. Rodriguez ◽  
Kathy B. Porter ◽  
William F. O'Brien

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252491
Author(s):  
Maria Regina Torloni ◽  
Monica Siaulys ◽  
Rachel Riera ◽  
Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco ◽  
Rafael Leite Pacheco ◽  
...  

Background There is no consensus on the best timing for prophylactic oxytocin administration during cesarean section (CS) to prevent post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). Objectives Assess the effects of administrating prophylactic oxytocin at different times during CS. Methods We searched nine databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT). We pooled results and calculated average risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the overall evidence certainty. Results We screened 13,389 references and included four trials. We found no statistically significant differences between oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH (RR 0.60, 95%CI 0.15–2.47; 1 RCT, N = 300) or nausea/vomiting (RR 1.21, 95%CI 0.69–2.13; 1 RCT, N = 300). There was a significant reduction in the need for additional uterotonics when oxytocin was given immediately before uterine incision versus after fetal delivery (RR 0.37, 95%CI 0.18–0.73; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs; N = 301). Oxytocin given before fetal delivery significantly reduced intra-operative blood loss (MD -146.77mL, 95%CI -168.10 to -125.43; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, N = 601) but did not change the incidence of blood transfusion (RR 0.50, 95%CI 0.13–1.95; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301) or hysterectomy (RR 3.00; 95%CI 0.12–72.77; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301). One trial (N = 100) compared prophylactic oxytocin before versus after placental separation and found no significant differences on PPH, additional uterotonics, or nausea/vomiting. Conclusions In women having pre-labor CS, there is limited evidence indicating no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH, nausea/vomiting, blood transfusion, or hysterectomy. Earlier oxytocin administration may reduce the volume of blood loss and need for additional uterotonics. There is very limited evidence suggesting no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after placental separation on PPH, need for additional uterotonic, or nausea/vomiting. The overall certainty of the evidence was mostly low or very low due to imprecision. Protocol: CRD42020186797.


2007 ◽  
Vol 197 (6) ◽  
pp. S77
Author(s):  
Yair Blumenfeld ◽  
Aaron Caughey ◽  
Yasser El-Sayed ◽  
Kay Daniels ◽  
Deirdre Lyell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document