Reconstruction of Chronic Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture using Fascia Lata Autograft

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Nathan T Morrell ◽  
Deana M Mercer ◽  
Moheb S Moneim

ABSTRACT Introduction Distal biceps tendon ruptures are a rare injury and surgical reconstruction is typically recommended for chronic ruptures. There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate reconstruction technique. We present our experience with fascia lata autograft reconstructions of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using a modified single incision technique and distal fixation with suture anchors. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 12 male patients with chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures who had reconstruction using a fascia lata autograft through a single anterior approach. The age ranged from 29 to 62 years. The average delay to surgery was 26.5 weeks (range 6-68 weeks). A modified single anterior incision was utilized for all patients. Fascia lata autograft was attached distally to the bicipital tuberosity using suture anchors. Tension was set with the elbow in 50° of flexion. The average follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1.5-66 months). All patients were treated by the senior author (MSM). Results Eleven patients (92%) reported subjective improvement in elbow flexion and supination strength, as well as painless range of motion. The average elbow flexion/ extension arc was 126° (5° flexion to 131° flexion) and the average supination/pronation arc was 167 degrees (87° pronation to 80° supination). Five patients underwent isokinetic flexion strength testing which revealed a restoration of 86% of strength when compared to the uninvolved side. Four patients underwent supination isokinetic strength testing which revealed a restoration of 87% of strength when compared to uninvolved side. Four patients reported numbness in the superficial radial nerve distribution that recovered within 12 months. There were no cases of heterotopic ossification or graft rupture. There was one case of wound dehiscence at the elbow that required local flap coverage and went on to heal uneventfully. Aside from a small muscle bulge at the donor site, there were no donor site complications. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest case series of patients undergoing distal biceps tendon reconstruction using fascia lata autograft. Our study has demonstrated a low complication rate with functional results similar to those reported in the literature utilizing a similar technique. We conclude that this technique offers a surgical treatment alternative that yields satisfactory functional outcomes with a low risk of complication. Morrell NT, Mercer DM, Moneim MS. Reconstruction of Chronic Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture using Fascia Lata Autograft. The Duke Orthop J 2012;2(1):55-59.

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. NP1-NP5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick J. Fairhurst ◽  
Arnold M. Schwartz ◽  
Leo M. Rozmaryn

Background: Given the appreciable prevalence of gout, gout-induced tendon ruptures in the upper extremity are extremely rare. Although these events have been reported only 5 times in the literature, all in patients with a risk factor for or history of gout, they have conspicuously never been diagnosed in the shoulder or elbow. Methods: A 45-year-old, right-hand-dominant man with a history of gout presented with pain in his right anterior elbow and weakness in his forearm after a trivial injury. Results: Here, we report the first case of gouty tenosynovitis of the distal biceps tendon insertion complicated by partial rupture, a composite diagnosis supported by both intraoperative and histological observations. Conclusions: In patients who are clinically diagnosed with biceps tendon rupture and have a history of gout, it is important to consider the possibility of a gout-related pathological manifestation causing or simulating tendon rupture.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izaäk F. Kodde ◽  
Michel P.J. van den Bekerom ◽  
Paul G.H. Mulder ◽  
Denise Eygendaal

Introduction: Hypertrophic changes at the radial tuberosity have traditionally been related to distal biceps tendon degeneration and rupture. From supination to pronation of the forearm, the space available for the distal biceps tendon between de lateral ulna and radial bicipital tuberosity (RBT) decreases by almost 50%. A hypertrophic change at the radial tuberosity further reduces this space with impingement of the distal biceps tendon as a result. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the size of the RBT plays a role in the pathophysiology of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a surgically proven distal biceps tendon rupture were matched to controls, in a 1:1 ratio. The size of the RBT was expressed as a ratio of the maximum diameter of the radius at the RBT to the diameter of the diaphysis just distal to the RBT (RD ratio), measured on standard radiographs of the elbow. The RD ratio of patients and matched controls were compared. Results: The mean RD ratio in control group was 1.25 and not significantly different from the mean 1.30 in the group of patients with a distal biceps tendon rupture. Each 0.1 point increase in RD ratio results in an estimated 60% increase of the rupture odds, which was not significant either. Conclusion: Based on the RD ratio on conventional radiographs of the elbow, there was no significant difference in RBT size between patients with a distal biceps tendon rupture and matched controls without biceps tendon pathology.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 167-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana Savvidou ◽  
Rodrigo Moreno

The purpose of this study is to identify a possible correlation between statin administration and incidence of spontaneous distal biceps tendon ruptures. We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients with distal biceps tendon rupture that were treated surgically from 2004 to 2010, 102 males and two females with mean age 47 years (range, 22–78). Patients were divided based on the mechanism of injury and statin administration. After statistical analysis, it was found nearly two times more likely to have spontaneous distal biceps tendon rupture with use of statins. Patients in Group 1 (spontaneous tendon rupture) compared to Group 2 (provoked tendon rupture) were older, had weaker postoperative strength but similar postoperative ROM. Patients taking statins compared to those that were not taking statins were older, had same postoperative strength and similar postoperative ROM. Based on the results of our study we conclude that there is a trend of association of spontaneous distal biceps tendon ruptures with statin administration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199181
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kapicioglu ◽  
Emre Bilgin ◽  
Necip Guven ◽  
Anil Pulatkan ◽  
Kerem Bilsel

Background: The classic injury mechanism of a distal biceps brachii tendon rupture (DBBTR) is eccentric loading to the flexed elbow when the forearm is supinated. Purpose: To determine alternative mechanisms of a DBBTR in powerlifting sports, particularly in deadlift competitions, with the use of YouTube videos. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A search on YouTube was performed using the search terms “distal biceps tendon rupture” and “distal biceps tendon injury” combined with “competition,” “deadlift,” and “powerlifting.” The videos underwent an evaluation for accuracy by 3 surgeons according to predetermined criteria. Type of sports activity, participant sex, side of the injury, and arm positions at the time of the injury were recorded. Results: Among the videos reviewed, 35 injuries were found appropriate for an evaluation. All participants were male. The majority of the injuries (n = 25) were observed during the deadlift. Only in 1 deadlift injury were both forearms in supination. In the remaining deadlift injuries (n = 24), all elbows were in extension, with 1 forearm in supination and the other in pronation. Among the deadlift injuries in the mixed-grip position, all ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity: 25% (n = 6) of ruptures occurred on the right side, and 75% (n = 18) of ruptures occurred on the left side; this was a significant difference ( P = .014). Conclusion: We described an alternative mechanism for a DBBTR, namely, eccentric loading to an extended elbow when the forearm is supinated during the deadlift. As all the ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity, holding the bar with both forearms in pronation may prevent or decrease the risk of ruptures during the deadlift.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document