Primary repair of multiligament knee injury with InternalBrace ligament augmentation

Multiligament injury of the knee usually occurs as a result of high-energy trauma causing tibiofemoral dislocation. These are rare but potentially limb-threatening injuries, frequently involving nerve or arterial damage and often leading to severe complex instability. Management generally favours surgical reconstruction of the affected ligaments, with controversy regarding optimal treatment. We present a severe multiligament knee injury (Schenk classification KD-IV involving both cruciate and both collateral ligaments) in a competitive showjumper. A combined arthroscopic/open technique of single-stage surgical repair and suture augmentation was used, repairing all affected ligaments. The patient made an excellent recovery, returning to work after 12 weeks and riding after 22 weeks. After 5-year follow-up, she has regained her previous level of competition without subsequent injury. Multiligament repair with suture augmentation is a viable approach to the management of knee dislocation injuries. We propose that this could provide superior outcomes to traditional reconstruction techniques using autograft or synthetic reconstruction.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstrings Augmented With the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Versus Hamstrings Alone: A Comparative Cohort Study

Background: Few studies have reported the return-to-sports (RTS) rate in patients after augmentation of autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent ACLR with single-bundle 4-strand hamstring autograft either without augmentation (HA-ACLR group) or with LARS augmentation (AUG-ACLR group). It was hypothesized that clinical outcomes and RTS rates would be better in the AUG-ACLR group at the 1-year follow-up, with similar outcomes in both cohorts by 2 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent ACLR between April 2014 and December 2017 were included in the current comparative study if they were skeletally mature and had 1- and 2-year follow-up outcomes; patients with concomitant meniscal surgery were also included. Included were 66 patients with AUG-ACLR (mean age, 26.8 years; 67% male) and 130 patients with HA-ACLR (mean age, 27.5 years; 61% male). Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm scale, Tegner activity scale, and the Noyes sports activity rating scale. Objective measures included knee laxity, maximal isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength, and the results of 4 functional hop tests. Results: There were no significant differences between the study groups in age, sex distribution, body mass index, time to surgery, or number of concurrent meniscal surgeries. At the 1-year follow-up, the AUG-ACLR group had a significantly higher Tegner score ( P = .001) and rates of RTS ( P = .029) and return to preinjury level of sport ( P = .003) compared with the HA-ACLR group. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no differences in these measures between groups. There were no between-group differences in other subjective outcomes, knee laxity, or strength and hop test results at either postoperative time point. There were also no differences in rerupture rates or other complications between the groups. Conclusion: Patients with AUG-ACLR had higher 1-year postoperative Tegner scores and rates of RTS and preoperative sport level compared with the HA-ACLR group. The 2-year rerupture rate for the AUG-ACLR group was low, and no intra-articular inflammatory complications were noted.

Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

Context: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is among the most common orthopaedic injuries, and reconstruction of a ruptured ACL is a common orthopaedic procedure. In general, surgical intervention is necessary to restore stability to the injured knee, and to prevent meniscal damage. Along with surgery, intense postoperative physical therapy is needed to restore function to the injured extremity. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been the standard of care in recent decades, and advances in surgical technology have reintroduced the prospect of augmented primary repair of the native ACL via a variety of methods. Evidence Acquisition: A search of PubMed database of articles and reviews available in English was performed through 2020. The search terms ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament repair, bridge enhanced acl repair, suture anchor repair, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal bracing, suture ligament augmentation, and internal brace ligament augmentation were used. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: No exact consensus exists on effective rehabilitation protocols after ACL repair techniques, as the variation in published protocols seem even greater than the variation in those for ACLR. For some techniques such as internal bracing and dynamic interligamentary stabilization, it is likely permissible for the patients to progress to full weightbearing and discontinue bracing sooner. However, caution should be applied with regard to earlier return to sport than after ACLR as to minimize risk for retear. Conclusion: More research is needed to address how physical therapies must adapt to these innovative repair techniques. Until that is accomplished, we recommend that physical therapists understand the differences among the various ACL surgery techniques discussed here and work with the surgeons to develop a rehabilitation protocol for their mutual patients. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): C.

Reduced proximal junctional failure with ligament augmentation in adult spinal deformity: a series of 242 cases with a minimum 1-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are well-recognized complications of long-segment spinal fusion. Previous studies have suggested that ligament augmentation can decrease rates of PJF by reducing junctional stress and strengthening upper instrumented vertebrae (UIVs) and adjacent segments. However, there is a paucity of long-term data on the efficacy of ligament augmentation in preventing PJF. In this study, the authors sought to determine the effect of ligament augmentation on rates of PJF in a cohort of adult spinal deformity patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS They conducted a retrospective analysis of ligament augmentation in a consecutive series of surgical patients with adult spinal deformity. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgery for PJF were collected. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reoperation for PJF. RESULTS The authors identified a total of 242 patients (166 women [68.6%]) with ligament augmentation whose mean age was 66 years. The mean number of fused levels was 10, with a UIV distribution as follows: 90 upper thoracic UIVs (37.2%) and 152 lower thoracic UIVs (62.8%). Compared to a historical cohort of 77 patients treated before implementation of ligament augmentation, reoperation for PJF was significantly lower with ligament augmentation (15.6% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate model, only ligament augmentation (OR 0.184, 95% CI 0.071–0.478, p = 0.001) and number of fused levels (OR 0.762, 95% CI 0.620–0.937, p = 0.010) were associated with reductions in reoperation for PJF. CONCLUSIONS Ligament augmentation was associated with significant reductions in the rate of reoperation for PJF at 12 months in a cohort of adult spinal deformity patients. The most dramatic reduction was seen among patients with lower thoracic UIV. These data suggest that in appropriately selected patients, ligament augmentation may be a valuable adjunct for PJF reduction; however, long-term follow-up is needed.

Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation at Clavicle Distal-Third Fracture Treatment

Background. Type 2B clavicle fractures with conoid ligament rupture are considered unstable. Although surgical treatment is recommended as the standard treatment modality for type 2B fractures, there is no consensus about the type of operative treatment. Material and methods. 15 patients that diagnosed with distal clavicle fractures, who underwent surgery for unstable type 2 fractures. Surgical treatment was done with a distal clavicle anatomic locked plate augmentation (ZipTight™) at all cases. The mean follow-up period was 24 months (range 12–40 months). Results. Bony union was achieved at a mean follow-up of 8 weeks (range 6–10 weeks). The mean Constant score was 97 (range 92–100). There were no complications or no need to second operation. Conclusions. The augmented technique reported here, provides early motion, increased stability and anatomic healing compared to other conventional options.